Well, that is the theme... Norway was the first one to sign up to a firm, volume purchase, so one would suppose they got a "sweetheart" deal to induce them to take that step (OK, their f-16s are getting v old).Lord Jim wrote: sink billions into a next gen
However, their 52 are already touching the $200m a piece mark (and this is for A's... not for the more expensive B's):
Defence Analysis; posted May 16, 2017
By Francis Tusa
"A fascinating snippet from the Norwegian Defence Procurement 2017–25 document:
“F-35 Upgrade. The purpose of the project is to increase the operational capability of the Armed Forces to perform offensive and defensive air operations. In order to achieve this goal upgrade of the F-35 Combat Fighter is needed. Update/upgrade the F-35 Combat Fighter according to the vendors upgrade programme adjusted to national/NATO ambition level.
Cost: NOK7–9-billion”
To be clear: this is spending on top and above that for the planned NOK-81-billion spend on buying 52 F-35As (UPC: $182-million), and it is needed to get them to the standard that will allow them to meet their operational requirements.
Wow! At face value, that means that Norway is having to spend up to 11% more – $1.05-billion – on making sure that the F-35A works as expected."
If the same happens with our planes (both budgets have items for airbase improvement included), the 1.11 X current budget = a round £10 bn
Rather than in any way being critical of Norway, hats off for them: with their early conversion, they will be operating as many 5th gen fighters as UK, France, Germany and Russia combined
- talking about Sweden... in less than three days we will know if we need to tip the hat for them, too??