RAF Space Operations

Contains threads on Royal Air Force equipment of the past, present and future.
Post Reply
indeid
Member
Posts: 271
Joined: 21 May 2015, 20:46

RAF Space Operations

Post by indeid »

Looks like the UK military might be making a move into space based ISR.

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/lift ... af-mission

SSTL are a real success story, seemingly not changed by the Airbus buyout, and do offer a comparative reduced cost capability. Looks like this is being used as a demonstrator to see what would be needed to run a fully military space based capability, lost since the Skynet PFI. This platform is being run by SSTL and I believe Earth-I also part funded it as a Tech Demo for their planned constellation. The NovaSAR platform of SSTL could be a useful way to go too.

User avatar
shark bait
Senior Member
Posts: 6427
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:18
Pitcairn Island

Re: RAF Space Operations

Post by shark bait »

Good to see a big gap in the UK's intelligence being closed, until now the UK was fully dependent on allied agreement for this stuff.
@LandSharkUK

User avatar
SKB
Senior Member
Posts: 7927
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:35
England

Re: RAF Space Operations

Post by SKB »

We've had space operatives for years.
Image Technically, he was Royal Navy, but.... :mrgreen:

indeid
Member
Posts: 271
Joined: 21 May 2015, 20:46

Re: RAF Space Operations

Post by indeid »

shark bait wrote:Good to see a big gap in the UK's intelligence being closed, until now the UK was fully dependent on allied agreement for this stuff.
This might be a first step on the way to a UK Space ISR capability, but still a way to go, this is still owned and run by SSTL so the gap is still there. Should be helpful though in working out how what needs to be done to move things forward. Timelines are interesting, I wonder if this was the Rapid Capabilities Office stretching its legs and showing another procurement model compared to DE&S?

If the UK military is going to get back into the flying satellites game now is the time, with the Airbus PFI coming to an end and a new solution needed for the running of those.

abc123
Senior Member
Posts: 2899
Joined: 10 May 2015, 18:15
United Kingdom

Re: RAF Space Operations

Post by abc123 »

indeid wrote:
shark bait wrote:Good to see a big gap in the UK's intelligence being closed, until now the UK was fully dependent on allied agreement for this stuff.
This might be a first step on the way to a UK Space ISR capability, but still a way to go, this is still owned and run by SSTL so the gap is still there. Should be helpful though in working out how what needs to be done to move things forward. Timelines are interesting, I wonder if this was the Rapid Capabilities Office stretching its legs and showing another procurement model compared to DE&S?

If the UK military is going to get back into the flying satellites game now is the time, with the Airbus PFI coming to an end and a new solution needed for the running of those.
:thumbup:
Fortune favors brave sir, said Carrot cheerfully.
What's her position about heavily armed, well prepared and overmanned armies?
Oh, noone's ever heard of Fortune favoring them, sir.
According to General Tacticus, it's because they favor themselves…

KyleG
Member
Posts: 56
Joined: 25 Oct 2016, 16:25
United Kingdom

Re: RAF Space Operations

Post by KyleG »

Hopefully before long we'll have at least a limited homegrown capability to launch future systems too.

User avatar
ArmChairCivvy
Senior Member
Posts: 16312
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
United Kingdom

Re: RAF Space Operations

Post by ArmChairCivvy »

The RAF is bringing Group 11 back, to cover the integration of air and space ops
" Group 11 was commanded by Air Vice-Marshal Sir Keith Park and had its headquarters at Uxbridge.
- Group 11 covered southeast England, which included the protection of London"

Someone hop over the paywalls?
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)

Post Reply