UK Defence Forum

News, History, Discussions and Debates on UK Defence.

Future UK Combat Aircraft (Project Tempest)

Contains threads on Royal Air Force equipment of the past, present and future.
User avatar
ArmChairCivvy
Senior Member
Posts: 8000
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
Location: United Kingdom

Re: Future UK Combat Aircraft (Project Tempest)

Postby ArmChairCivvy » 08 Nov 2018, 15:44

Germany might be tempted to use the Tempest effort/ join it, to up the game from Tr3+ to Tr4?

"Thus any partners might be involved in some, all or just certain aspects of project."

matt00773
Member
Posts: 241
Joined: 01 Jun 2016, 14:31
Location: United Kingdom

Re: Future UK Combat Aircraft (Project Tempest)

Postby matt00773 » 08 Nov 2018, 16:38

Short article on the future combat aircraft programme listing the technologies being investigated:

https://eandt.theiet.org/content/articl ... the-skies/

Timmymagic
Member
Posts: 952
Joined: 07 May 2015, 23:57
Location: United Kingdom

Re: Future UK Combat Aircraft (Project Tempest)

Postby Timmymagic » 08 Nov 2018, 17:06

ArmChairCivvy wrote:Germany might be tempted to use the Tempest effort/ join it, to up the game from Tr3+ to Tr4?

"Thus any partners might be involved in some, all or just certain aspects of project."


Possibly. But I suspect they're not really looking much beyond the P1E, AESA and Centurion style upgrades at present for the potential order to replace T1.
As to a 'T4' I can't see them initially going beyond the full UK T3 standard with AESA, B61 integration and conformal tanks. I wouldn't even expect them to develop the EJ-200 further.

User avatar
ArmChairCivvy
Senior Member
Posts: 8000
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
Location: United Kingdom

Re: Future UK Combat Aircraft (Project Tempest)

Postby ArmChairCivvy » 08 Nov 2018, 17:12

Timmymagic wrote: I suspect they're not really looking much beyond the P1E, AESA and Centurion style upgrades at present for the potential order to replace T1.


Agreed, was thinking about the next step.

Ron5
Senior Member
Posts: 3251
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:42
Location: United States of America

Re: Future UK Combat Aircraft (Project Tempest)

Postby Ron5 » 08 Nov 2018, 17:23

matt00773 wrote:Short article on the future combat aircraft programme listing the technologies being investigated:

https://eandt.theiet.org/content/articl ... the-skies/


What, no stealth?

User avatar
ArmChairCivvy
Senior Member
Posts: 8000
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
Location: United Kingdom

Re: Future UK Combat Aircraft (Project Tempest)

Postby ArmChairCivvy » 08 Nov 2018, 17:25

matt00773 wrote:Short article on the future combat aircraft programme listing the technologies being investigated:

https://eandt.theiet.org/content/articl ... the-skies/


A lot of coded messages there, like automated weapon release
"Trusted reasoning: Future combat aircraft will require increases in processing power and novel algorithms to enable rapid decision-making against a range of threats."
Ron5 wrote:What, no stealth?

-old hat :D

matt00773
Member
Posts: 241
Joined: 01 Jun 2016, 14:31
Location: United Kingdom

Re: Future UK Combat Aircraft (Project Tempest)

Postby matt00773 » 08 Nov 2018, 17:58

Ron5 wrote:
matt00773 wrote:Short article on the future combat aircraft programme listing the technologies being investigated:

https://eandt.theiet.org/content/articl ... the-skies/


What, no stealth?


Good point, though as this is about developing new technologies I guess stealth is assumed?

Interesting about the adaptable airframe and multi-role configuration.

matt00773
Member
Posts: 241
Joined: 01 Jun 2016, 14:31
Location: United Kingdom

Re: Future UK Combat Aircraft (Project Tempest)

Postby matt00773 » 08 Nov 2018, 18:03

ArmChairCivvy wrote:
matt00773 wrote:Short article on the future combat aircraft programme listing the technologies being investigated:

https://eandt.theiet.org/content/articl ... the-skies/


A lot of coded messages there, like automated weapon release
"Trusted reasoning: Future combat aircraft will require increases in processing power and novel algorithms to enable rapid decision-making against a range of threats."
I have to admit the article is disappointing. The site did 3 articles this week with interviews with BAE covering new technologies for land, sea and air and really only scratched the surface using lots of fluff and buzz words.

Lord Jim
Senior Member
Posts: 1791
Joined: 10 Dec 2015, 02:15
Location: United Kingdom

Re: Future UK Combat Aircraft (Project Tempest)

Postby Lord Jim » 08 Nov 2018, 22:34

Cannot really expect much more from a conceptual study.

Ares
Member
Posts: 22
Joined: 04 Dec 2017, 19:19
Location: Japan

Re: Future UK Combat Aircraft (Project Tempest)

Postby Ares » 13 Nov 2018, 15:45

I want to drop this JNAAM info here since the Tempest would use this missile too.

JNAAM will use Ka-band GaN AESA radar made by Mitsubishi Electric as its seeker.
(胴径が小型化されたシーカにおいても、現有装備品と同等以上のシーカ探知性能を確保するため、GaNモジュール(※4)を適用することにより小型・高出力化を実現する技術を確立する。
http://www.mod.go.jp/j/approach/hyouka/seisaku/results/29/pdf/jizen_03_honbun.pdf)

AAM-4B has Ka-band AESA seeker too but it made of GaAS.
Image

FYI, watch this video from MBDA about the advantage of Ka-band frequency using it for missile seeker.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JG2B-Ot9SL4

According to the Japanese MoD, its first launch test will be carried on a U.K. fighter to reduce the development cost. (Meteor構成品を活用するとともに発射試験の母機に英国のMeteor搭載可能機種を使用することで研究経費及び期間の効率化を図る計画としている。)

The prototyping period is from 2018 to 2022 and the trial period is from 2021 to 2023.(事業実施の時期平成30年度から平成34年度まで研究試作を実施し、平成33年度から平成35年度まで試験を実施する予定である。)

Source : http://www.mod.go.jp/j/approach/agenda/ ... iryou2.pdf page.17

Overall, thanks to the high power GaN-based AESA seeker that has very long-range detection capability and very fast throttleable ducted rocket engine, JNAAM can track & kill the low RCS and highly maneuverable targets with the unique air-to-air location prediction guidance system.

Image

If this missile goes well for U.K. and Japan, US may buy it too since they are struggling to develop the successor AAM to ARMRAAM.

User avatar
ArmChairCivvy
Senior Member
Posts: 8000
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
Location: United Kingdom

Re: Future UK Combat Aircraft (Project Tempest)

Postby ArmChairCivvy » 13 Nov 2018, 18:25

Ares wrote:thanks to the high power GaN-based AESA seeker that has very long-range detection capability and very fast throttleable ducted rocket engine, JNAAM can track & kill the low RCS and highly maneuverable targets


As the man says! once in a blue moon the good old USA might want to buy something from us
... even for Brimstone 2 they had to go and do "their thing" when it was there: off the shelf

User avatar
Gabriele
Senior Member
Posts: 1880
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:53
Location: Italy
Contact:

Re: Future UK Combat Aircraft (Project Tempest)

Postby Gabriele » 13 Nov 2018, 21:40

US may buy it too since they are struggling to develop the successor AAM to ARMRAAM.


I'm not sure they are struggling. They are saying very little about the ongoing programmes for new AAMs, but the programmes exist and are ongoing.

Anyway, having JNAAM ready soon would obviously be a good thing for chasing after an export chance.
You might also know me as Liger30, from that great forum than MP.net was.

Arma Pacis Fulcra.
Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum

matt00773
Member
Posts: 241
Joined: 01 Jun 2016, 14:31
Location: United Kingdom

Re: Future UK Combat Aircraft (Project Tempest)

Postby matt00773 » 16 Nov 2018, 06:36

There's an article on the French/German FCAS project where the French "must have" capabilities are stated as firing nuclear weapons and to conduct carrier operations. There's also a comment about the possibility of on-boarding the Tempest project at a later date. However, if you add into the mix that Dassault will be the lead contractor for the central combat aircraft then I don't think there's much chance of the UK being involved at all. There's certainly no need for UK to have another aircraft carrier capable jet and it seems to me the French just want other people to help pay for their new toys - maybe a criticism of UK as well?

Furthermore, there's a lot stated about FCAS managing swarms of drones - which just seem like someone has been watching too much science fiction. If you're going to have drone's conduct missions, there's no need to have it manged through a single point of failure that itself is part of the mission. Surely the drone itself can be programmed as well as using satellites and other assets that can relay signals?

Anyway it's early days, but it seems that there's quite a gap between the Tempest and FCAS visions.

https://www.defensenews.com/global/euro ... plane-bid/

User avatar
ArmChairCivvy
Senior Member
Posts: 8000
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
Location: United Kingdom

Re: Future UK Combat Aircraft (Project Tempest)

Postby ArmChairCivvy » 16 Nov 2018, 07:23

A good find. It has gone quiet for a while (agreeing the joint requirements was known to be on the go)
- Spain joining is a new development
- also "Airbus and Dassault are the main contractors for the FCAS program. They are slated to receive initial study contracts early next year." these study contracts will need to be based on something (agreed "must have" requirements).

When the French AF Chief was wooing the Belgian parlamentarians (F-35 decision happened well thereafter), he was hinting that the new plane would be "a" Rafale XL
- hence a bigger carrier will be needed. Note the fielding date for the NGF given in the article: 2040
- the said PA NG was covered by Florence Parly on the "Le grand rendez-vous" show by Europe 1/CNews/Les Échos [and] She stressed that the current aircraft carrier, the Charles de Gaulle, is set to remain in service until around 2040 (as planned). [The thanks :thumbup: for picking that one up goes to xav & Co]

Tempest being a technology research project it would seem to align more with the Airbus NGF responsibilities than Dassault's. Then again, the unmanned thread of the whole prgrm is still to take its shape. When the Anglo-French project (that has now become the sole proprietor of its name, again) was still running, Airbus was loudly complaining about being left out, in the cold.

RetroSicotte
Site Admin
Posts: 2041
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:10
Location: United Kingdom

Re: Future UK Combat Aircraft (Project Tempest)

Postby RetroSicotte » 16 Nov 2018, 08:48

Them saying "Tempest can join later" is basically a low key attempt to belittle and perceptualise the British aerospace industry as a second tier player compared to them, given it would (In such case) just be "hey come here and give us some of your money and we'll let you put a couple of your things into our plane that you can then buy!"

Something to be stringently avoided. The UK is not in the same situation as France and Germany where it is lacking for modern aircraft into the 2040's and onwards, what with F-35. The UK has the time to sit and develop this one. No need to rush into only bolstering Dassault/Airbus.

User avatar
ArmChairCivvy
Senior Member
Posts: 8000
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
Location: United Kingdom

Re: Future UK Combat Aircraft (Project Tempest)

Postby ArmChairCivvy » 16 Nov 2018, 10:41

RetroSicotte wrote: The UK is not in the same situation as France and Germany where it is lacking for modern aircraft into the 2040's and onwards, what with F-35. The UK has the time to sit and develop this one.


Agreed. A rare luxury.

And needed, too. The RAF is in good shape (save for integration prgrms that proceed at a glacial pace; and for the "soon-to-appear" gaping hole in helicopter fleets, as for the mid-weight category).

As the Dreadnoughts are bulldozing through defence budgets, the above gives some respite to use the crumbs falling off the table for
- patching up the AFV fleets
- and keeping up the frigate "workhorse" numbers.


Return to “Royal Air Force”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 1 guest