indeid wrote:Is there no process for ‘misunderstandings’ like this to be rectified before these reviews are published?
They used to defend the whole year's delay with exactly that.
- may be the delay has been cut? At least the contents have, as the focus is now fully on cost estimation and apportioning/ checking funding (not on what we are going to get, and e.g. what are the operational consequences of not getting delivery, or of major delays).