Eurofighter Typhoon (RAF)
-
- Donator
- Posts: 3235
- Joined: 07 May 2015, 23:57
Re: Eurofighter Typhoon (RAF)
As others on the thread pointed out it only referred to Tranche 3 Typhoon. No mention of Tranche 2, which could be a good thing or a bad thing (more than likely bad..)
-
- Donator
- Posts: 3235
- Joined: 07 May 2015, 23:57
Re: Eurofighter Typhoon (RAF)
Here's the written answer in full...no mention of 'initially'....
Q8. Further information on the timetable for the E-Scan radar project. (Q143)
The E-Scan radar project is in the assessment phase and NETMA continues to progress technical and commercial negotiations with Eurofighter.
Whilst these discussions are still ongoing, and the timescales are therefore subject to change, we anticipate MOD Main Gate investment approval in the latter half of 2019. We expect that the new radar will be embodied on 40 Tranche 3 Typhoons.
Q8. Further information on the timetable for the E-Scan radar project. (Q143)
The E-Scan radar project is in the assessment phase and NETMA continues to progress technical and commercial negotiations with Eurofighter.
Whilst these discussions are still ongoing, and the timescales are therefore subject to change, we anticipate MOD Main Gate investment approval in the latter half of 2019. We expect that the new radar will be embodied on 40 Tranche 3 Typhoons.
-
- Retired Site Admin
- Posts: 2657
- Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:10
- ArmChairCivvy
- Senior Member
- Posts: 16312
- Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
Re: Eurofighter Typhoon (RAF)
Let's hold the horses?
There are three versions of the new radar; are we going in with a phased, errr phase-in?
Could be good news: the rest will get "a better one"?
Also, the previous Captor is every bit as good as it should be... exc. for low probability of intercept, while using it
-- if you are flying in an air-defence role, so what: more Meteors! to outmatch the other side
But, if you are flying in a penetrating mode/ that sort of mission... with the JSFs (if they don't happen to be on the carriers... oceans apart ) or without them/ their help; then that can be everything
-- the new motto: "See, without being seen "
There are three versions of the new radar; are we going in with a phased, errr phase-in?
Could be good news: the rest will get "a better one"?
Also, the previous Captor is every bit as good as it should be... exc. for low probability of intercept, while using it
-- if you are flying in an air-defence role, so what: more Meteors! to outmatch the other side
But, if you are flying in a penetrating mode/ that sort of mission... with the JSFs (if they don't happen to be on the carriers... oceans apart ) or without them/ their help; then that can be everything
-- the new motto: "See, without being seen "
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)
-
- Retired Site Admin
- Posts: 2657
- Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:10
Re: Eurofighter Typhoon (RAF)
It was as good as could be...on its induction.ArmChairCivvy wrote:Also, the previous Captor is every bit as good as it should be...
Right now it's about whats needed, provided you're not going up against someone with top end spectrum stuff.
But the idea that it's on par with modern AESA radars still to be introduced out to 2040 just holds no water. If the remainder of the fleet are not upgraded, then that is an enormous issue. There were already notes that the Captor-M was struggling with even the Gripen-C and Rafale F2 electronic protections, not to mention its well known issues trying to find the F-22 at anything outside WVR to short-medium range. And those versions are already a decade old themselves and since replaced or on the way to replacement.
You can't rest on laurels. Because it said "best" when it came out means nothing 10+ years later, let alone out past 2030. Captor-E should be a mandatory upgrade for anything that isn't a Tranche 1 (which cannot actually fit it). Anything less should be considered as the severe cut that it is, rather than trying to mitigate and "argue for".
- ArmChairCivvy
- Senior Member
- Posts: 16312
- Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
Re: Eurofighter Typhoon (RAF)
RetroSicotte wrote: be introduced out to 2040 just holds no water
ArmChairCivvy wrote:There are three versions of the new radar; are we going in with a phased, errr phase-in?
Could be good news: the rest will get "a better one"?
... I agree with that punchlineRetroSicotte wrote:You can't rest on laurel
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)
-
- Retired Site Admin
- Posts: 2657
- Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:10
Re: Eurofighter Typhoon (RAF)
When they announce it, sure.
But the way it sounds, they just want to do their usual thing. Checkbox military.
Have an AESA on Typhoon so we can soundbite that we've given it one regardless of only a small portion of the fleet getting it - Check!
But the way it sounds, they just want to do their usual thing. Checkbox military.
Have an AESA on Typhoon so we can soundbite that we've given it one regardless of only a small portion of the fleet getting it - Check!
- ArmChairCivvy
- Senior Member
- Posts: 16312
- Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
Re: Eurofighter Typhoon (RAF)
We share the frustration.RetroSicotte wrote:When they announce it, sure.
But the way it sounds, they just want to do their usual thing.
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)
-
- Retired Site Admin
- Posts: 2657
- Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:10
Re: Eurofighter Typhoon (RAF)
It was always going to be only a certain number in the fleet. It's been standard for many upgrades across multiple fleets. Anything else isn't unaffordable under current budgets.
Re: Eurofighter Typhoon (RAF)
It’s all a question of funding and what happens when. E-Scan Radar in typhoon delivers end of this year to gulf countries, product sets already underway.
Like with all our fleets if you rob support and sustainment to pay for shinny new this is what happens. We’ve sen this playoutnwith awacs and apaches. Will all our f35s keep pace with the block upgrades or with it be only some it’s a recurring theme with us.
Like with all our fleets if you rob support and sustainment to pay for shinny new this is what happens. We’ve sen this playoutnwith awacs and apaches. Will all our f35s keep pace with the block upgrades or with it be only some it’s a recurring theme with us.
- ArmChairCivvy
- Senior Member
- Posts: 16312
- Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
Re: Eurofighter Typhoon (RAF)
From Italy, to Kuwait... the radar sets might be "Scottish" ?SW1 wrote:E-Scan Radar in typhoon delivers end of this year to gulf countries, product sets already underway.
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)
Re: Eurofighter Typhoon (RAF)
ArmChairCivvy wrote:From Italy, to Kuwait... the radar sets might be "Scottish" ?SW1 wrote:E-Scan Radar in typhoon delivers end of this year to gulf countries, product sets already underway.
They are indeed from hensoldt to Edinburgh witha touch of Spanish flair!ArmChairCivvy wrote:From Italy, to Kuwait... the radar sets might be "Scottish" ?SW1 wrote:E-Scan Radar in typhoon delivers end of this year to gulf countries, product sets already underway.
The RAF maybe looking for something similar but different and may well have German interest for future buys.
Bae are looking at addition cost of upgrading earlier variants to e-scan but it will ultimately be a budget driven decision.
- ArmChairCivvy
- Senior Member
- Posts: 16312
- Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
Re: Eurofighter Typhoon (RAF)
From the personal perspective (Spanish wife; son with a degree from the Edinburgh Uni) that sounds like a perfect product/ solutionSW1 wrote:Edinburgh witha touch of Spanish flair!
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)
-
- Member
- Posts: 780
- Joined: 03 May 2015, 16:19
Re: Eurofighter Typhoon (RAF)
BriteCloud to be integrated onto Typhoon in RAF service: https://www.janes.com/article/85668/bri ... ntegration
-
- Retired Site Admin
- Posts: 2657
- Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:10
- ArmChairCivvy
- Senior Member
- Posts: 16312
- Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
Re: Eurofighter Typhoon (RAF)
I think you posted about it a year ago? A rumour/ leak at that stageRetroSicotte wrote:Excellent to see confirmation.
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)
Re: Eurofighter Typhoon (RAF)
About Spear 3, are they integrated on F-35B? Because they are on that picture, in front of the F-35B. Same thing with Meteor, not integrated, because they will use AIM-120D.
Fortune favors brave sir, said Carrot cheerfully.
What's her position about heavily armed, well prepared and overmanned armies?
Oh, noone's ever heard of Fortune favoring them, sir.
According to General Tacticus, it's because they favor themselves…
What's her position about heavily armed, well prepared and overmanned armies?
Oh, noone's ever heard of Fortune favoring them, sir.
According to General Tacticus, it's because they favor themselves…
-
- Donator
- Posts: 3235
- Joined: 07 May 2015, 23:57
Re: Eurofighter Typhoon (RAF)
Not yet. They will be in block 4. But...until then UK F-35B will only be external cannon (EDIT - As per Gabi none have been procured yet, looks like they will be left until Block 4 if at all..), legacy Asraam (NOT Asraam CSP), Amraam C-5 and D and Paveway IV.abc123 wrote:About Spear 3, are they integrated on F-35B? Because they are on that picture, in front of the F-35B. Same thing with Meteor, not integrated, because they will use AIM-120D.
I can't find out if the Amraam D purchase is in place of the Amraam C-5 re-life which needs to happen if they are to stay in service past 2020ish. If it is....then we have issues as it means we have a grand total of 120 medium/long range missiles across our entire fast jet fleet (plus whatever Meteor are built in the next few years, but they're only for T3 Typhoon, 260 have been mentioned as the total)....Personally, I'd re-life the C-5's and buy the D's and minimise the Meteor buy for the next few years. Why? Leave the C-5's with Tranche 1 & 2 Typhoons, Meteor to Tranche 3 Typhoon and all of the Amraam D to F-35B. Ramp the buy of Meteor up when the GaN AESA seeker from the JNAAM collaboration is ready (which could tie in with F-35B integration) then go all in on Meteor, moving the Amraam D over to the Tranche 2 Typhoons, whilst the C-5's retire with Tranche 1 Typhoon.
In reality UK F-35B won't be 'fully' operational until c2025/26 (which is also the timescale for full CEPP) when it has Meteor, Asraam CSP and SPEAR integrated and deployed and possibly the gun pod (in addition to PWIV and Amraam D). The air to air weapons for Typhoon at present are the best in the world (Typhoon T3 right now) or will be for F-35B when integration and deployment takes place. But our air to ground munitions are lacking, particularly in variety. At present the RAF will field Brimstone 2, SPEAR, Storm Shadow, EPWIII and Paveway IV (admittedly in a couple of models inc. penetrator and hopefully moving target with Brimstone seeker, although that one has gone quiet...) and thats it, and not all available from all platforms. Which when you have only 2 fast jet types is ludicrous. We're clearly missing some capabilities, off the top of my head...with suggestions..
- A glide kit for Paveway IV to extend range - MBDA does the Diamondback wing kit which could be adapted, we also need to adapt this to allow Stingray carriage and operation from P-8.
- A cheap small GPS guided glide bomb a la JDAM/SDB1 - MBDA is developing the SmartGlider family. These are essentially SBD1 competitors, with the same shape as SPEAR. SmartGlider Light fits the bill. Integration should be easy as a result with F-35B and Typhoon. Smaller warheads than PWIV, a lot cheaper than SPEAR. Same launcher and footprint though.
- Cheap, Heavier than 500lb munition - With the retirement of PWII and EPWIII being rather more expensive, a cheap 1,000 or 2,000lb munition is needed. The MBDA Smartglider family also has a 1,300kg Heavy variant. Sometimes more bang is necessary. Not sure of the form factor on this though. Could be UK made and will have longer range than EPWIII.
- Anti Radiation Missile - I'm conflicted on this as SPEAR could fulfil the role for DEAD with F-35B (and with Typhoon if its EW fitout gets improved). The only option at present is the AARGM which is hugely expensive. But...MBDA showed a concept of a CAMM with Brimstone seeker, which would be a brilliant solution, high speed, easily integrated with Typhoon and F-35B. Would also make an easy Brimstone like capability for F-35B (with admittedly only 2 carried on the outer pylon) let alone the implications for the Army and Navy, there is also an E/O variant...
- Anti-Ship/Medium/Heavy Cruise missile - Until (or if) FCASW arrives the only practical solution for this is JSM. There is a smart move the UK could make on this that would address the obsolescence of Harpoon 1C on surface ships, plus arm Typhoon, P-8 and F-35, whilst also providing a sub-surface ASM for SSN's and ASM for T31 after 2030 but I doubt we'll make it.
- Novel stores - The F-35 and Typhoon need a standard weapon shape for novel stores (think the E-bomb or graphite filament bombs). The SmartGlider Heavy form if adopted as the 'heavy' bomb should be adapted as a 'container' for other stores. The UK has historically, and to date, done a lot of research on these but has no method of delivery. A standard, decent sized, GPS guided gliding container would allow lots of different payloads to be incorporated/developed.
- ArmChairCivvy
- Senior Member
- Posts: 16312
- Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
Re: Eurofighter Typhoon (RAF)
Good post, fits here as Typhoon will be the mainstay for many years to come
- just that for half a decade any OpFor, by just knowing what platforms are in the air, would be able to tell their capabilities and thereby plan their 'counter'
- their survivability should get a hard look, and then a proportionate investment in 'unmanned wingmen' would be called for - while we slowly get "there" with our fast jets; in abt 7 yr's time
- we could economise and leave the Tiffie integration out... and it would still be a good plan!
I agree as the timescales are pretty much set in stone, so economically that would be the best way forwardTimmymagic wrote: Leave the C-5's with Tranche 1 & 2 Typhoons, Meteor to Tranche 3 Typhoon and all of the Amraam D to F-35B. Ramp the buy of Meteor up when the GaN AESA seeker from the JNAAM collaboration is ready [...] then go all in on Meteor, moving the Amraam D over to the Tranche 2 Typhoons, whilst the C-5's retire with Tranche 1 Typhoon.
In reality UK F-35B won't be 'fully' operational until c2025/26 (which is also the timescale for full CEPP)
- just that for half a decade any OpFor, by just knowing what platforms are in the air, would be able to tell their capabilities and thereby plan their 'counter'
Quite. We are more dependent on Apaches than we thinkTimmymagic wrote: our air to ground munitions are lacking
- their survivability should get a hard look, and then a proportionate investment in 'unmanned wingmen' would be called for - while we slowly get "there" with our fast jets; in abt 7 yr's time
- yes, been banging on that scenario for many more years than these pages have operatedTimmymagic wrote:There is a smart move the UK could make on this that would address the obsolescence of Harpoon 1C on surface ships, plus arm Typhoon, P-8 and F-35, whilst also providing a sub-surface ASM for SSN's and ASM for T31 after 2030 but I doubt we'll make it.
- we could economise and leave the Tiffie integration out... and it would still be a good plan!
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)
Re: Eurofighter Typhoon (RAF)
From the comments above, I am assuming the F-35 has all the black boxes built in to locate, and identify ground based threats, then pass the information on the a weapon system. A variant of ASRAAM or other missile in this role would require a seeker that can home in on a hostile emitter and remember where it was if the target goes dark. Ideally it would have a second seeker to aid in hitting a mobile target if needed.
My preferred approach would be to have small UAV able to be carrier and launched from a fast jet or other platform, that would go ahead of its parent, sniff out any hostile emitters and kamikaze into it.
My preferred approach would be to have small UAV able to be carrier and launched from a fast jet or other platform, that would go ahead of its parent, sniff out any hostile emitters and kamikaze into it.
-
- Donator
- Posts: 3235
- Joined: 07 May 2015, 23:57
Re: Eurofighter Typhoon (RAF)
One more....Timmymagic wrote:We're clearly missing some capabilities, off the top of my head...with suggestions..
- A MALD-J type jammer. Actually pretty easy for the UK to generate. MBDA SmartGlider or SPEAR (for powered version) body, stick a BriteCloud inside and fit a much larger battery/fuel cell power source (RAM air would likely restrict range dramatically) to prolong duration as BriteCloud only has a 10 second lifespan due to battery life. Easy peasy.
Re: Eurofighter Typhoon (RAF)
Fortune favors brave sir, said Carrot cheerfully.
What's her position about heavily armed, well prepared and overmanned armies?
Oh, noone's ever heard of Fortune favoring them, sir.
According to General Tacticus, it's because they favor themselves…
What's her position about heavily armed, well prepared and overmanned armies?
Oh, noone's ever heard of Fortune favoring them, sir.
According to General Tacticus, it's because they favor themselves…
-
- Donator
- Posts: 3235
- Joined: 07 May 2015, 23:57
Re: Eurofighter Typhoon (RAF)
Realistically, Amraam C-5 on a T1 Typhoon is still superior to any Russian platform they are likely to come up against for the next 10 years as the Russian's are decades behind on deployment of active radar missiles, let alone modern IR missiles, particularly in a UK QRA role. Realistically, if they come up against F-35 with Amraam D or Typhoon T3 with Meteor they may as well just give up as they have nothing close.ArmChairCivvy wrote:- just that for half a decade any OpFor, by just knowing what platforms are in the air, would be able to tell their capabilities and thereby plan their 'counter'
Thats one of the key features of F-35. SPEAR will operate like this. The use of a MMW seeker on a SEAD or DEAD weapon is a game changer, no more switching off emitters to spoof a missile. If the F-35 can locate the emitter to within a reasonable fix the MMW seeker will do the rest when the weapon arrives in its 'box'. You could even set the missile to target the command and control vehicle rather than the aerial of the emitter. Or send 2, one to kill the emitter, the other the associated control vehicle. And it doesn't matter if they manage to get moving (which given set up times is unlikely anyway).Lord Jim wrote:From the comments above, I am assuming the F-35 has all the black boxes built in to locate, and identify ground based threats, then pass the information on the a weapon system. A variant of ASRAAM or other missile in this role would require a seeker that can home in on a hostile emitter and remember where it was if the target goes dark. Ideally it would have a second seeker to aid in hitting a mobile target if needed.
-
- Donator
- Posts: 3235
- Joined: 07 May 2015, 23:57
Re: Eurofighter Typhoon (RAF)
Sorry thought it was 120, that may be the figure for the number of C-5 that we have (all of the ex-RN Amraam B's have long gone). Just to add the only notices I've seen to date have been 'approval' to buy 'up to' 200 missiles as per the usual US process, along with a load of support eqpt. No guarantee we'll get all 200, but the level set is likely to be in the ballpark.abc123 wrote:UK bought 200 AIM-120D IIRC...
And to think back in the Cold War we used to wonder if 27 missiles per fighter in the RAF was going to be enough....