Eurofighter Typhoon (RAF)

Contains threads on Royal Air Force equipment of the past, present and future.
User avatar
ArmChairCivvy
Senior Member
Posts: 16312
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
United Kingdom

Re: Typhoon

Post by ArmChairCivvy »

marktigger wrote:how practical it would be for the RAF to take the Early tranches and get them stripped completley and rebuilt with current of next en radars and systems and the airframes refurbished?
The answer is no. The details are on TD; the "search" there is crap, though, so good luck. The best contributions on this topic were by "mark" - might help.
abc123 wrote:Maybe sommething along the French costs to upgrade Rafale F1 to F3? IIRC around 25 mil. euros per aircraft?
- either Frenchie or myself recently posted the right figure here recently (has slipped too deep on my hard drive, already, for retrieval)
- the F1s only came out of storage, for the upgrades, when foreign orders started flowing - until then the line was kept going by taking brand-new instead of upgrades
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)

abc123
Senior Member
Posts: 2903
Joined: 10 May 2015, 18:15
United Kingdom

Re: Typhoon

Post by abc123 »

Yes, Frenchie posted the numbers.
It's 24 mil. euros per plane.

I heard somewhere that Tranche 1 Typhoons can't be equipped with AESA radar because it can't be put inside? Don't know why? Is that truth?

Or just the cost of modernising them to Tranche 3 would be prohibitly expencive?
Fortune favors brave sir, said Carrot cheerfully.
What's her position about heavily armed, well prepared and overmanned armies?
Oh, noone's ever heard of Fortune favoring them, sir.
According to General Tacticus, it's because they favor themselves…


Timmymagic
Donator
Posts: 3235
Joined: 07 May 2015, 23:57
United Kingdom

Re: Typhoon

Post by Timmymagic »

It's hard to think of any other aircraft on earth that is as 'swing role' as that image. I know its missing the Sniper pod but it just looks like you could stick the same load on it again and it wouldn't be straining it.

We've really got to maximise our investment in Typhoon, and that image illustrates why. You've basically got the best air to air loadout of any aircraft on earth (4xMeteor, 2xAsraam and a BK-27) AND 2 fuel tanks, 6 Brimstone and 2 Paveway IV. Exchange the Brimstone for SPEAR III in due course and it gets even better. And it still looks like the only thing stopping it from carrying a whole lot more is that its run out of pylons.

bobp
Senior Member
Posts: 2698
Joined: 06 May 2015, 07:52
United Kingdom

Re: Typhoon

Post by bobp »

Couldn't agree more with your statement the Typhoon looks a mean beast with all that weaponry. Yes we need more but sadly we don't have the money.

User avatar
Zealot
Member
Posts: 98
Joined: 20 Feb 2017, 16:39
United Kingdom

Re: Typhoon

Post by Zealot »

Timmymagic wrote:We've really got to maximise our investment in Typhoon, and that image illustrates why. You've basically got the best air to air loadout of any aircraft on earth (4xMeteor, 2xAsraam and a BK-27) AND 2 fuel tanks, 6 Brimstone and 2 Paveway IV. Exchange the Brimstone for SPEAR III in due course and it gets even better. And it still looks like the only thing stopping it from carrying a whole lot more is that its run out of pylons.
Conformal fuel tanks will instantly free up two Pylons for additional Brimstone/Spear or Storm Shadow. They could also use more than one Paveway per pylon as well. Much like this set up;
Loadout.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

User avatar
ArmChairCivvy
Senior Member
Posts: 16312
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
United Kingdom

Re: Typhoon

Post by ArmChairCivvy »

Timmymagic wrote:. I know its missing the Sniper pod
If you have ever seen a photo of a wide-area surveillance pod attached, you will understand that having also those on Typhoon makes the plane look like twins joined up at birth
- what are we going to do, not to lose the capabiility when Tornados go? Which is soon-ish
- put them on the drones that in a contested airspace are good for target practise, only? See the Future Combat Air thread
Zealot wrote:Conformal fuel tanks will instantly free up two Pylons for additional Brimstone/Spear or Storm Shadow.
- yep, that is what is needed
- just the loadout increases drag so much that you will need those bigger tanks
- not to mention that you will need SS to take out radars and command centres *(even if the latter have been hardened) at a distance and then finish off with the feebler Spear3 and short-ranged Brimstone
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)

User avatar
shark bait
Senior Member
Posts: 6427
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:18
Pitcairn Island

Re: Typhoon

Post by shark bait »

But at it stands Spear is not funded for full integration on Typhoon, it's only being used for development tests.

RE Early tranches; I've always wondered if we could 'do a Growler' with them....
@LandSharkUK

User avatar
ArmChairCivvy
Senior Member
Posts: 16312
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
United Kingdom

Re: Typhoon

Post by ArmChairCivvy »

shark bait wrote:Spear is not funded for full integration on Typhoon, it's only being used for development tests.
Yes, it is only quite recent that it became the preferred alternative over the cheaper "glide bombs".
shark bait wrote: RE Early tranches; I've always wondered if we could 'do a Growler' with them....
Podded, may be. Internally we cannot even fit an AESA onto them.
- out of the near-200 Raptors the first 60 have similar upgrading issues; there was an initiative to fund their conversion into a SEAD/ DEAD role, so that the less stealthy F-35s could do the rest... a bit like our F-35s in the lead, and the Tiffies will do the rest
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)

User avatar
shark bait
Senior Member
Posts: 6427
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:18
Pitcairn Island

Re: Typhoon

Post by shark bait »

Growler took the gun out and replaced it with fancy electronics, that's what I was referring to by 'do a Growler'. That would give us a chink of internal space to play with on a Typhoon if we really wanted to.
@LandSharkUK

User avatar
Gabriele
Senior Member
Posts: 1998
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:53
Contact:
Italy

Re: Typhoon

Post by Gabriele »

If the UK wants an EW escort capability, the easiest and perhaps only solution is Elettronica's new EDGE jammer pod. Being completely self-contained, it doesn't require changes to the aircraft itself. Swap the centerline fuel tank for this 5+ meters pod, and you have the ability to put up a wall of electronic disturb and a number of false radar returns on the enemy screens.
You might also know me as Liger30, from that great forum than MP.net was.

Arma Pacis Fulcra.
Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum

Dahedd
Member
Posts: 660
Joined: 06 May 2015, 11:18

Re: Typhoon

Post by Dahedd »

Timmymagic wrote:It's hard to think of any other aircraft on earth that is as 'swing role' as that image. I know its missing the Sniper pod but it just looks like you could stick the same load on it again and it wouldn't be straining it.

I maybe wrong but I seem to remember a picture of a Typhoon with a similar load but the forward right Meteor was replaced by a targeting pod. So only 3 meteors as opposed to 4.

They also need to sort out conformal tanks asap so it can carry a wider load & replace the Tornado.

bobp
Senior Member
Posts: 2698
Joined: 06 May 2015, 07:52
United Kingdom

Re: Typhoon

Post by bobp »

Wouldn't converting a Typhoon into a "Growler" type entail the use of a second crew member to manage the electronics.

Dahedd
Member
Posts: 660
Joined: 06 May 2015, 11:18

Re: Typhoon

Post by Dahedd »

Ideally I'd imagine so. Use the two sweaters with conformal tanks, less weapons more pods.

(All very fantasy fleet I know)

Defiance
Donator
Posts: 870
Joined: 07 Oct 2015, 20:52
United Kingdom

Re: Typhoon

Post by Defiance »

Dahedd wrote:Ideally I'd imagine so. Use the two sweaters with conformal tanks, less weapons more pods.

(All very fantasy fleet I know)
Need to get someone to step up and say "i'll pay for conformal tanks!" first! :)

Would be keen to find out what the current state-of-play is with the common weapon launcher.

User avatar
ArmChairCivvy
Senior Member
Posts: 16312
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
United Kingdom

Re: Typhoon

Post by ArmChairCivvy »

Defiance wrote:someone to step up and say "i'll pay for conformal tanks!" first! :)
Germany has formally stated thay they wont need them. the other partner nations have been dragging their heels on all upgrades... so who might it be?
- a tip: BAE has recommenced the wind-tunnel testing
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)

Defiance
Donator
Posts: 870
Joined: 07 Oct 2015, 20:52
United Kingdom

Re: Typhoon

Post by Defiance »

ArmChairCivvy wrote:
Defiance wrote:someone to step up and say "i'll pay for conformal tanks!" first! :)
Germany has formally stated thay they wont need them. the other partner nations have been dragging their heels on all upgrades... so who might it be?
- a tip: BAE has recommenced the wind-tunnel testing
Don't need conformal tanks for DCA work which is what the Germans intend to do, likely be the UK that pushes for it as the penchent for expeditionary ops increases (moreso than Italy at least).

Little J
Member
Posts: 978
Joined: 02 May 2015, 14:35
United Kingdom

Re: Typhoon

Post by Little J »

What about a certain Middle Eastern country? Thought they like CFT's?

Defiance
Donator
Posts: 870
Joined: 07 Oct 2015, 20:52
United Kingdom

Re: Typhoon

Post by Defiance »

Little J wrote:What about a certain Middle Eastern country? Thought they like CFT's?
If it's KSA then they're a little money constrained at the minute, or they will be and it's all hands to the pumps to try and figure a way for that not to happen.

Maybe as part of batch 2

dmereifield
Senior Member
Posts: 2762
Joined: 03 Aug 2016, 20:29
United Kingdom

Re: Typhoon

Post by dmereifield »

Defiance wrote:
Little J wrote:What about a certain Middle Eastern country? Thought they like CFT's?
If it's KSA then they're a little money constrained at the minute, or they will be and it's all hands to the pumps to try and figure a way for that not to happen.

Maybe as part of batch 2
If there is a batch 2......

User avatar
shark bait
Senior Member
Posts: 6427
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:18
Pitcairn Island

Re: Typhoon

Post by shark bait »

Kongsberg & BAE are integrating JSM on the typhoon, no mention of government funding, so im left assuming its a privately financed.

If it does end up on typhoon it certainly makes JSM look attractive for the UK, on F35, typhoon and P8 presumably at some point since the missiles sponsors are both P8 users. One missile for all three jets, that would be something!

Perhaps its also a role for the tranche 1's, which would otherwise have little to do in a couple of years?

This news comes from Malaysia, where BAE are pushing for a typhoon sale....
@LandSharkUK

dmereifield
Senior Member
Posts: 2762
Joined: 03 Aug 2016, 20:29
United Kingdom

Re: Typhoon

Post by dmereifield »

Interesting stuff. Any info on Malaysian requirements and the timeframe for making a decision?

Jdam
Member
Posts: 933
Joined: 09 May 2015, 22:26
United Kingdom

Re: Typhoon

Post by Jdam »

The potential platforms and option for teaming up for integrating the weapons does make it look attractive, typhoon integrating makes it look ever better.

A bit more at the link.

http://www.airrecognition.com/index.php ... ckage.html

Did they ever going ahead with the JSM and the MK 41 launcher tests?

User avatar
shark bait
Senior Member
Posts: 6427
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:18
Pitcairn Island

Re: Typhoon

Post by shark bait »

dmereifield wrote:Interesting stuff. Any info on Malaysian requirements and the timeframe for making a decision?
Another Euro-Canard competition, 20 multi role aircraft with lots of industrial offsets wanted.
@LandSharkUK

dmereifield
Senior Member
Posts: 2762
Joined: 03 Aug 2016, 20:29
United Kingdom

Re: Typhoon

Post by dmereifield »

shark bait wrote:
dmereifield wrote:Interesting stuff. Any info on Malaysian requirements and the timeframe for making a decision?
Another Euro-Canard competition, 20 multi role aircraft with lots of industrial offsets wanted.
Thanks, so the American platforms are not in the running? I don't know about offsets, bit a bit of joined up thinking by HMG would help secure a lot of these deals, we invest a fortune into R&D to support economic development in Malaysia (and most of the developing world for that matter) through the Newton fund et al., it should count for something in these situations, we keep hearing about our soft power but it doesn't seem to be leveraged very well to me

Post Reply