Eurofighter Typhoon (RAF)

Contains threads on Royal Air Force equipment of the past, present and future.
dmereifield
Senior Member
Posts: 2762
Joined: 03 Aug 2016, 20:29
United Kingdom

Re: Typhoon

Post by dmereifield »

topman wrote:It all got divied up, so no one felt left out and they all got a bag of sweeties to take home.
Sound business approach....

User avatar
ArmChairCivvy
Senior Member
Posts: 16312
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
United Kingdom

Re: Typhoon

Post by ArmChairCivvy »

Timmymagic wrote:Spain leading in South America, apart from Argentina and Brazil where the UK would lead.
True, Spain has an unresolved dispute :) with Argentina (the nationalisation of Repsol's ops there) whereas our dispute has been de facto solved (put onto the back burner, and no one has lit that burner... for now).
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)

topman
Member
Posts: 776
Joined: 07 May 2015, 20:56
Tokelau

Re: Typhoon

Post by topman »

dmereifield wrote:
topman wrote:It all got divied up, so no one felt left out and they all got a bag of sweeties to take home.
Sound business approach....
Like most big defence projects it's little to do with business.

MRCA
Member
Posts: 186
Joined: 29 Apr 2017, 22:47
United Kingdom

Re: Typhoon

Post by MRCA »

Timmymagic wrote:All true. Never quite worked out the Italy and Kuwait connection. Always thought the UK had more clout, the Italians weren't that active in 91...
The Kuwait airforce pilots do there training in Italy.

Ron5
Donator
Posts: 7323
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:42
United States of America

Re: Typhoon

Post by Ron5 »

Doesn't the country that makes the sale get final assemby?

Defiance
Donator
Posts: 870
Joined: 07 Oct 2015, 20:52
United Kingdom

Re: Typhoon

Post by Defiance »

Ron5 wrote:Doesn't the country that makes the sale get final assemby?
Unless the country they're selling to stipulates local manufacture, yes.

User avatar
ArmChairCivvy
Senior Member
Posts: 16312
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
United Kingdom

Re: Typhoon

Post by ArmChairCivvy »

Defiance wrote:
Ron5 wrote:Doesn't the country that makes the sale get final assemby?
Unless the country they're selling to stipulates local manufacture, yes.
I think the offer to Indonesia had the Spanish line thrown in, as a sweetener
- well, the choice was for something else in the end
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)

Pongoglo
Member
Posts: 231
Joined: 14 Jun 2015, 10:39
United Kingdom

Re: Typhoon

Post by Pongoglo »

sunstersun wrote:
Timmymagic wrote:
Defiance wrote:AE broadly has responsibility for the middle East but I believed it was identified Italy having greater pull in Kuwait so things were shifted.
All true. Never quite worked out the Italy and Kuwait connection. Always thought the UK had more clout, the Italians weren't that active in 91...

But the Germans buggered up India, as they did with Switzerland. And as to Austria? Selling some surplus T1 wasn't that hard with the links between Germany and Austria, let alone the arguments over running costs and corruption. In retrospect you have to wonder if the UK and Italy would have been better off without Germany and Spain.
Could you explain how Germany buggered up India?
Because they aircraft they chose to demonstrate was like all Luftwaffe Tiffies only Air to Air capable and not Air to Ground. The Rafale the French brought along was truly multi role and came with all bells and whistles which is what the Indian's were looking for and specified in the RFI. Same applied to the Grippen I believe....

abc123
Senior Member
Posts: 2905
Joined: 10 May 2015, 18:15
United Kingdom

Re: Typhoon

Post by abc123 »

Pongoglo wrote:
sunstersun wrote:
Timmymagic wrote:
Defiance wrote:AE broadly has responsibility for the middle East but I believed it was identified Italy having greater pull in Kuwait so things were shifted.
All true. Never quite worked out the Italy and Kuwait connection. Always thought the UK had more clout, the Italians weren't that active in 91...

But the Germans buggered up India, as they did with Switzerland. And as to Austria? Selling some surplus T1 wasn't that hard with the links between Germany and Austria, let alone the arguments over running costs and corruption. In retrospect you have to wonder if the UK and Italy would have been better off without Germany and Spain.
Could you explain how Germany buggered up India?
Because they aircraft they chose to demonstrate was like all Luftwaffe Tiffies only Air to Air capable and not Air to Ground. The Rafale the French brought along was truly multi role and came with all bells and whistles which is what the Indian's were looking for and specified in the RFI. Same applied to the Grippen I believe....
Well, they can't demonstrate something they don't have ( and for that matter, nobody has- not even RAF )...
Fortune favors brave sir, said Carrot cheerfully.
What's her position about heavily armed, well prepared and overmanned armies?
Oh, noone's ever heard of Fortune favoring them, sir.
According to General Tacticus, it's because they favor themselves…

abc123
Senior Member
Posts: 2905
Joined: 10 May 2015, 18:15
United Kingdom

Re: Typhoon

Post by abc123 »

So, what's the story for AESA radar on RAF-s Typhoons? :?:
Fortune favors brave sir, said Carrot cheerfully.
What's her position about heavily armed, well prepared and overmanned armies?
Oh, noone's ever heard of Fortune favoring them, sir.
According to General Tacticus, it's because they favor themselves…

Frenchie
Member
Posts: 619
Joined: 07 Nov 2016, 15:01
France

Re: Typhoon

Post by Frenchie »

Just for information about India and the Rafale.

http://www.aircosmosinternational.com/i ... mes-100557

Opinion3
Member
Posts: 352
Joined: 06 May 2015, 23:01

Re: Typhoon

Post by Opinion3 »

There do appear to have been a number of opportunities that have been a harder sell due to a lack of progress on development on our side. The ASEA radar, A2G multi-role development, Brimstone integration, and ASRAAM integration all spring to mind. I am not convinced there was demand for the conformals but sadly had the money been put up for a timely development of the above, Rafale and Gripen might have had a tougher sell against a Tiffy

sunstersun
Member
Posts: 363
Joined: 09 Aug 2017, 04:00
United States of America

Re: Typhoon

Post by sunstersun »

https://theaviationist.com/2017/10/...d ... bYWwDuK.99

3rd crash in a short period of time.

Tinman
Member
Posts: 290
Joined: 03 May 2015, 17:59
United Kingdom

Re: Typhoon

Post by Tinman »

sunstersun wrote:https://theaviationist.com/2017/10/...d ... bYWwDuK.99

3rd crash in a short period of time.
They have a long way to go to catch up with the F16 and F18.

MRCA
Member
Posts: 186
Joined: 29 Apr 2017, 22:47
United Kingdom

Re: Typhoon

Post by MRCA »

sunstersun wrote:https://theaviationist.com/2017/10/...d ... bYWwDuK.99

3rd crash in a short period of time.
Sadly 2 crashes the result of doing loop to loop when to low and the 3rd flew into a mountain on operations.

Defiance
Donator
Posts: 870
Joined: 07 Oct 2015, 20:52
United Kingdom

Re: Typhoon

Post by Defiance »

https://theaviationist.com/2017/10/28/y ... ver-yemen/

Houthi rebels claim to have downed an RSAF Typhoon. No videos or pictures, so time will tell.

Timmymagic
Donator
Posts: 3249
Joined: 07 May 2015, 23:57
United Kingdom

Re: Typhoon

Post by Timmymagic »

Aviation Week and UK Defence Journal are reporting that Typhoon Brimstone firing trials have successfully concluded. It doesn't look like it will be long now for operational clearance to start.


downsizer
Member
Posts: 897
Joined: 02 May 2015, 08:03

Re: Typhoon

Post by downsizer »

Few more evolutions to be had before operational clearance.

Timmymagic
Donator
Posts: 3249
Joined: 07 May 2015, 23:57
United Kingdom

Re: Typhoon

Post by Timmymagic »

downsizer wrote:Few more evolutions to be had before operational clearance.
I seem to remember an interview with a Typhoon squadron leader who was confident of a date of autumn 2018 for Meteor and Brimstone, does that sound credible?

MRCA
Member
Posts: 186
Joined: 29 Apr 2017, 22:47
United Kingdom

Re: Typhoon

Post by MRCA »

Initial Meteor and storm shadow clearance are part of the p2e currently being evaluated by 41 Sqn. P3e introduces brimstone won’t be with 41 Sqn until middle of next year. Once 41 Sqn are happy they’ll be rolled out to the fleet. While everyone likes to focus on the stuff that goes bang there other significant upgrades upgrades being introduced with both packages that will enhance the a/c considerably.

User avatar
ArmChairCivvy
Senior Member
Posts: 16312
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
United Kingdom

Re: Typhoon

Post by ArmChairCivvy »

MRCA wrote: While everyone likes to focus on the stuff that goes bang there other significant upgrades upgrades being introduced with both packages that will enhance the a/c considerably.
There are lots (60-70) brand new Captor-Ms that were ordered as a stop gap, to keep the line running while waiting for the delays with "E" to be cleared. How's the roll-out that officially started in 2015 going?

Spotted some money for conformals in the EP. However, that horizon is ten-years, so where, along the way...?

Pretorian upgrades? The wholes system was developed specifically for the Eurofighter. Will BAE be in the position to borrow upgrades from the more recent Barracuda?

MADL GW has been successfully tested on a tiffie... will there be money for it? Will there be money for it? How many needed? Just for deployed active fleet, not for those in storage/ deep maintenance... nor for those in-between, whatever that part of the fleet is called today?

I am convinced that the MoD is running a covert Kremnilogist training prgrm... and those of us who "pass" will be invited to the formal one :lol:
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)

Lord Jim
Senior Member
Posts: 7314
Joined: 10 Dec 2015, 02:15
United Kingdom

Re: Typhoon

Post by Lord Jim »

In principal the RAF could get a more efficient and effective airplane out of the Typhoon that it could from the F-35 and I strongly believe that if the pro-USA lobby in the MoD could be gagged that is where we would end up. The usual problem exists though in that money is available for initial programme phases but rarely these days appears for the actual production. Great for career progression but bad for the countries capabilities.

Ron5
Donator
Posts: 7323
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:42
United States of America

Re: Typhoon

Post by Ron5 »

Typhoon won't be too effective on the carriers.

User avatar
SKB
Senior Member
Posts: 7949
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:35
England

Re: Typhoon

Post by SKB »

Ron5 wrote:Typhoon won't be too effective on the carriers.
There was a concept for a Sea Typhoon. Rejected, but I did a thread for it a while back anyway: http://ukdefenceforum.net/viewtopic.php?f=41&t=302

Lord Jim
Senior Member
Posts: 7314
Joined: 10 Dec 2015, 02:15
United Kingdom

Re: Typhoon

Post by Lord Jim »

F-35B = FAA
Typhoon = RAF

I didn't mean not buy the F-35, but that the RAF is fixated on it as the future, where instead it should be devoting the maximum resources to getting the most out of the Typhoon. We only need the 50 odd F-35s already planned to give us the Carrier capability we need, backed by 120 Typhoon FGR6 with AESA, Conformal fuel tanks, SPEAR in all it guises and so on. Together with force multipliers like AAR, ISTAR and it makes a pretty powerful air component for the UK's military and way ahead of any likely threat especially when the training and abilities of the pilots are also included.

Post Reply