Apache Attack Helicopter (British Army Air Corps)
Re: Apache Attack Helicopter (Army Air Corps)
Given that there is now confirmation (?) that the new UK Apache will have Brimstone 2 missiles, and given they have 40+km range (if you believe Wikipedia) , how will this change the tactics of the attack helicopters? They will be able to hit precision targets well behind the battlefront, a function they have never had before.
Re: Apache Attack Helicopter (Army Air Corps)
Don't think it is quite certain yet, but that should be the direction of travel. The aim is to replace Hellfire in 2021, so, being the remanufactured Apaches planned to be delivered beginning in 2020, there should be the chance to deliver them ready for Brimstone.
You might also know me as Liger30, from that great forum than MP.net was.
Arma Pacis Fulcra.
Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum
Arma Pacis Fulcra.
Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4640
- Joined: 01 May 2015, 10:22
Re: Apache Attack Helicopter (Army Air Corps)
I wonder with the modifications on the AH64E will it replace AH1 in the USMC to. I digress
interesting how we've improved Hellfire wonder if Brimstone will go onto Wildcat, Merlin as well as F35, typhoon and reaper. But I do wonder should we look at surface launched versions on ships or vehicles.
interesting how we've improved Hellfire wonder if Brimstone will go onto Wildcat, Merlin as well as F35, typhoon and reaper. But I do wonder should we look at surface launched versions on ships or vehicles.
Re: Apache Attack Helicopter (Army Air Corps)
Lets get it onto the Apache first. We test fired the missile from the Predator drone and that didn't come to anything.marktigger wrote: interesting how we've improved Hellfire wonder if Brimstone will go onto Wildcat, Merlin as well as F35, typhoon and reaper. But I do wonder should we look at surface launched versions on ships or vehicles.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4640
- Joined: 01 May 2015, 10:22
- ArmChairCivvy
- Senior Member
- Posts: 16312
- Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
Re: Apache Attack Helicopter (Army Air Corps)
Folks that want that (badly) have bought Wildcats, installed with NLOS.Old RN wrote:40+km range (if you believe Wikipedia) , how will this change the tactics of the attack helicopters? They will be able to hit precision targets well behind the battlefront, a function they have never had before.
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)
- ArmChairCivvy
- Senior Member
- Posts: 16312
- Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
Re: Apache Attack Helicopter (Army Air Corps)
Doubt it v much; they place more emphasis than anyone else on maintainability in the field and the AH/UH commonality at parts level will be important.marktigger wrote:will it replace AH1 in the USMC to. I digress
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)
- ArmChairCivvy
- Senior Member
- Posts: 16312
- Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
Re: Apache Attack Helicopter (Army Air Corps)
Yep, utube itmarktigger wrote:i think its also been tested against small boats
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)
Re: Apache Attack Helicopter (Army Air Corps)
Jdam wrote:MBDA and Boeing have jointly completed a series of firing trials of the Brimstone 2 missile on the AH-64E attack helicopter
This means the UK Apache helicopters will soon be able to rain Hellfire & Brimstone on the enemy. Cool
Re: Apache Attack Helicopter (Army Air Corps)
Old RN wrote:Given that there is now confirmation (?) that the new UK Apache will have Brimstone 2 missiles, and given they have 40+km range (if you believe Wikipedia) , how will this change the tactics of the attack helicopters? They will be able to hit precision targets well behind the battlefront, a function they have never had before.
That's a very good question (how will a UK Apache use over the horizon targeting). I don't know but in discussions about extended range Hellfires, one possibility was getting their targeting info via link 16 from an airborne ISTAR asset. In UK terms, I guess that would be a Sentinel. That would be a lethal combo.Old RN wrote:Given that there is now confirmation (?) that the new UK Apache will have Brimstone 2 missiles, and given they have 40+km range (if you believe Wikipedia) , how will this change the tactics of the attack helicopters? They will be able to hit precision targets well behind the battlefront, a function they have never had before.
However, even tho Link 16 is new for US AH-64E, I don't know if it is part of the UK order.
As for Brimstone on Apache, we need to remember that was proof of concept trials that were just successfully completed i.e. will it work. The longer and more expensive integration of Brimstone with Apache has not yet been performed i.e. make it part of the Apache weapon system capable of being aimed and fired with the Apache targeting systems. I don't know if that has been funded. I did read an expectation it would be done toward the end of this year.
Someone mentioned Brimstones firing at boats. The US AH-64E have an upgrade that will enable improved over water targeting. My understanding is that is a software only upgrade to the Longbow radar. New built UK Apaches will be fitted with refurbished Longbows taken from existing UK machines. I assume adding the software upgrade would not be a problem. But, once again, I don't know and with 'puters, assumptions are always dangerous.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4640
- Joined: 01 May 2015, 10:22
Re: Apache Attack Helicopter (Army Air Corps)
i suspect they will be standard but there may be bits the americans don't want us to have and bits of code we'll add that we don't want them to have.
-
- Donator
- Posts: 3243
- Joined: 07 May 2015, 23:57
Re: Apache Attack Helicopter (Army Air Corps)
[quote="Ron5"]That's a very good question (how will a UK Apache use over the horizon targeting). I don't know but in discussions about extended range Hellfires, one possibility was getting their targeting info via link 16 from an airborne ISTAR asset. In UK terms, I guess that would be a Sentinel. That would be a lethal combo.
IIRC the 40km+ range is from a fast mover. It will still be very long ranged, but might lose a few km from a helicopter.
In terms of targeting the control and pairing of UAV's and Apache E's open up a lot of possibility with the Apache operating as a stand off shooter after target acquisition. If that works successfully (and if we pair it with the right ISTAR assets, and a suitably cheap battlefield UAV) it could address a lot of concerns about the survivability of AH over a modern battlefield.
In terms of weapon integration I think the more interesting thing, now that Brimstone is a given, is if we adopt an APKWS guided CRV7 or go down the LMM/Martlet route. I'd love to see both as APKWS on CRV7 seems a no-brainer, but LMM integration throws open the interesting possibility of finally seeing Starsteak on Appache after successful trials years ago.
IIRC the 40km+ range is from a fast mover. It will still be very long ranged, but might lose a few km from a helicopter.
In terms of targeting the control and pairing of UAV's and Apache E's open up a lot of possibility with the Apache operating as a stand off shooter after target acquisition. If that works successfully (and if we pair it with the right ISTAR assets, and a suitably cheap battlefield UAV) it could address a lot of concerns about the survivability of AH over a modern battlefield.
In terms of weapon integration I think the more interesting thing, now that Brimstone is a given, is if we adopt an APKWS guided CRV7 or go down the LMM/Martlet route. I'd love to see both as APKWS on CRV7 seems a no-brainer, but LMM integration throws open the interesting possibility of finally seeing Starsteak on Appache after successful trials years ago.
Re: Apache Attack Helicopter (Army Air Corps)
In terms of Brimstone 2 range the Wikipedia quote is 40+km from helicopters and 60+km from fast jets!
Re: Apache Attack Helicopter (Army Air Corps)
Apaches have actually been used in deep strikes in several occasions. They were part of the opening moves in Iraq, for example. Having a networked, longer range weapon and the ability to receive targeting information from UAS will make it easier and more effective. Moreover, what it really does is helping to keep the Apache out of range of modern SHORAD and vSHORAD air defences.They will be able to hit precision targets well behind the battlefront, a function they have never had before.
You might also know me as Liger30, from that great forum than MP.net was.
Arma Pacis Fulcra.
Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum
Arma Pacis Fulcra.
Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum
Re: Apache Attack Helicopter (Army Air Corps)
O.P.S.E.C.
Admin Note: This user is banned after turning most of their old posts into spam. This is why you may see their posts containing nothing more than dots or symbols. We have decided to keep these posts in place as it shows where they once were and why other users may be replying to things no longer visible in the topic. We apologise for any inconvenience.
Re: Apache Attack Helicopter (Army Air Corps)
I wonder if if would be technically possible to integrate a RF homer sensor into this in a bigger airframe ( Meteor). This would be an awesome SEAD weapon. I know they talked about Armiger but that is a dead program.
-
- Donator
- Posts: 3243
- Joined: 07 May 2015, 23:57
Re: Apache Attack Helicopter (Army Air Corps)
It would be fairly straightforward. But the RAF is looking to move to DEAD with SPEAR 3. For SEAD it would make more sense to re-resurrect ALARM with it's loiter capability. For the UK the F-35 negates the need for the long range AND speed of a Meteor ARM. The SPEAR 3 has the range. If we were looking to have a missile to attack enemy radars fast in a reactive sense it would probably make more sense (in an operational and cost sense) to have one based on CAMM, sort of a modern day SideARM.
-
- Donator
- Posts: 3243
- Joined: 07 May 2015, 23:57
Re: Apache Attack Helicopter (Army Air Corps)
They don't say much on range. Think Defence in his excellent Complex Weapons series had this to say..arfah wrote:Brimstone characteristics straight from the horses mouth, MBDA.
"The range of Brimstone is generally accepted to be approximately 20km, with Brimstone 2, again, generally accepted as approximately 20km. These are in situations where the missiles launch speed is augmented by the fast jets own speed, for rotary or ground platforms, the range will be reduced."
If you've not read the entire series it is well worth the read...
http://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/uk-complex-weapons/
Re: Apache Attack Helicopter (Army Air Corps)
UAVs controlled from Apaches has not exactly been problem free. Crew workload has been deemed to be excessive.Timmymagic wrote:Ron5 wrote:That's a very good question (how will a UK Apache use over the horizon targeting). I don't know but in discussions about extended range Hellfires, one possibility was getting their targeting info via link 16 from an airborne ISTAR asset. In UK terms, I guess that would be a Sentinel. That would be a lethal combo.
IIRC the 40km+ range is from a fast mover. It will still be very long ranged, but might lose a few km from a helicopter.
In terms of targeting the control and pairing of UAV's and Apache E's open up a lot of possibility with the Apache operating as a stand off shooter after target acquisition. If that works successfully (and if we pair it with the right ISTAR assets, and a suitably cheap battlefield UAV) it could address a lot of concerns about the survivability of AH over a modern battlefield.
In terms of weapon integration I think the more interesting thing, now that Brimstone is a given, is if we adopt an APKWS guided CRV7 or go down the LMM/Martlet route. I'd love to see both as APKWS on CRV7 seems a no-brainer, but LMM integration throws open the interesting possibility of finally seeing Starsteak on Appache after successful trials years ago.
Re: Apache Attack Helicopter (Army Air Corps)
I was under the impression that the reason systems like Alarm had died is because they are so easily spoofed.Timmymagic wrote:It would be fairly straightforward. But the RAF is looking to move to DEAD with SPEAR 3. For SEAD it would make more sense to re-resurrect ALARM with it's loiter capability. For the UK the F-35 negates the need for the long range AND speed of a Meteor ARM. The SPEAR 3 has the range. If we were looking to have a missile to attack enemy radars fast in a reactive sense it would probably make more sense (in an operational and cost sense) to have one based on CAMM, sort of a modern day SideARM.
Re: Apache Attack Helicopter (Army Air Corps)
We wouldn't want it taking out our mobile phones now. In the first gulf war some of the US anti radiation missiles took out some communication towers in Saudi Arabia. These days they have to contend with a lot of frequencies and signals and as Ron5 mentioned can be easily fooled.Ron5 wrote:I was under the impression that the reason systems like Alarm had died is because they are so easily spoofed.
- ArmChairCivvy
- Senior Member
- Posts: 16312
- Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
Re: Apache Attack Helicopter (Army Air Corps)
The main reason for Alarm having been taken off service is its lacking range; the launch platform would likely be destroyed before Alarm could get started with its job
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)
Re: Apache Attack Helicopter (Army Air Corps)
ArmChairCivvy wrote:The main reason for Alarm having been taken off service is its lacking range; the launch platform would likely be destroyed before Alarm could get started with its job
93km according to the RAF website. Seems pretty good.
-
- Donator
- Posts: 3243
- Joined: 07 May 2015, 23:57
Re: Apache Attack Helicopter (Army Air Corps)
I don't recall much about said about it's withdraws. It seemed to have reached a point where it needed to be mlu'd after the 2010 SDSR so got canned as a result, I suspect money was the issue. All I've seen about it's effectiveness is that it was regarded as far more effective than HARM in a real world context. I do wonder if the threat libraries were kept as updated as HARM, no idea if it shared a common database/library for updates. I would have thought so as that used to be something that NATO did well.
-
- Donator
- Posts: 3243
- Joined: 07 May 2015, 23:57
Re: Apache Attack Helicopter (Army Air Corps)
No idea what the actual range is, but I'd take any published range on the RAF's website with a massive dose of salt. If it's on there, its wrong, and usually by a healthy margin. Storm Shadow is listed as around 200 miles range and ASRAAM's used to be laughably low.Ron5 wrote:93km according to the RAF website. Seems pretty good.