Ground Based Air Defence

Contains threads on British Army equipment of the past, present and future.
bobp
Senior Member
Posts: 2684
Joined: 06 May 2015, 07:52
United Kingdom

Re: Ground Based Air Defence

Post by bobp »

Some drones are so tiny that missiles cant lock onto them, whether by IR or Radar. A really good detection system is needed to get an accurate bearing and range, and altitude probably in the mm wavelength, and if your lucky take it out with a blast fragmentation shell in close proximity or one of the new Electronic Warfare jammers. First you must detect it.

arfah
Senior Member
Posts: 2173
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 19:02
Niue

Re: Ground Based Air Defence

Post by arfah »

............
Admin Note: This user is banned after turning most of their old posts into spam. This is why you may see their posts containing nothing more than dots or symbols. We have decided to keep these posts in place as it shows where they once were and why other users may be replying to things no longer visible in the topic. We apologise for any inconvenience.

User avatar
ArmChairCivvy
Senior Member
Posts: 16312
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
United Kingdom

Re: Ground Based Air Defence

Post by ArmChairCivvy »

bobp wrote: A really good detection system is needed to get an accurate bearing and range
Eye ball Mk1, lots of them and networked. Triangulation can't then be fooled by flight patterns (likely to come pre-programmed). Altitude must be done at the time of engagement as the human eye is not good with that (not even knowing the size of the object).

The problem is that the drones are likely to be circling around a concentration area (where dispersal will have been practised). So start to put rounds with proximity fuses up, or machine gun fire being corrected with the help of tracers... and a lot of it will be landing on the heads of your own troops.

Drones will be ubiquitous so no specialised solution (for them only) like lasers will be able to match that (in numbers/ presence).
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)

bobp
Senior Member
Posts: 2684
Joined: 06 May 2015, 07:52
United Kingdom

Re: Ground Based Air Defence

Post by bobp »

@ACC Thanks for putting me right I forgot about the nice guys on the ground.

Andy-M
Member
Posts: 50
Joined: 01 Jun 2015, 20:25
United Kingdom

Re: Ground Based Air Defence

Post by Andy-M »

ArmChairCivvy wrote:That .ru page buggered up my PC so well that a reboot was required...

I wonder what else came with it?
damn, I had two to choose from and picked that one, worryingly my security didn't pick anything up, looks like a system scan will be required. :oops:

marktigger
Senior Member
Posts: 4640
Joined: 01 May 2015, 10:22
United Kingdom

Re: Ground Based Air Defence

Post by marktigger »

ArmChairCivvy wrote:
bobp wrote: A really good detection system is needed to get an accurate bearing and range
Eye ball Mk1, lots of them and networked. Triangulation can't then be fooled by flight patterns (likely to come pre-programmed). Altitude must be done at the time of engagement as the human eye is not good with that (not even knowing the size of the object).

The problem is that the drones are likely to be circling around a concentration area (where dispersal will have been practised). So start to put rounds with proximity fuses up, or machine gun fire being corrected with the help of tracers... and a lot of it will be landing on the heads of your own troops.

Drones will be ubiquitous so no specialised solution (for them only) like lasers will be able to match that (in numbers/ presence).
ArmChairCivvy wrote:
bobp wrote: A really good detection system is needed to get an accurate bearing and range
Eye ball Mk1, lots of them and networked. Triangulation can't then be fooled by flight patterns (likely to come pre-programmed). Altitude must be done at the time of engagement as the human eye is not good with that (not even knowing the size of the object).

The problem is that the drones are likely to be circling around a concentration area (where dispersal will have been practised). So start to put rounds with proximity fuses up, or machine gun fire being corrected with the help of tracers... and a lot of it will be landing on the heads of your own troops.

Drones will be ubiquitous so no specialised solution (for them only) like lasers will be able to match that (in numbers/ presence).
Jamming their C2 with active Jammers is a good options to but an Integrating ESM into the AD detection network has got to be the first step. Providing an Electronic OP that can give a warning cry on ADCIS or like system giving range bearing will assist optical detection. Remember Starstreak is fired against UAV's in my day Blowpipe/Javelin it was against Shorts Skeets and AAAD was fired against MATSB

bobp
Senior Member
Posts: 2684
Joined: 06 May 2015, 07:52
United Kingdom

Re: Ground Based Air Defence

Post by bobp »

Is starstreak able to lock onto a small electrical toy drone and isn't that overkill. Which is the point I was trying to make earlier. And as ACC mentioned rightly so you have to be careful what you fire over the heads of your own troops.

mr.fred
Senior Member
Posts: 1468
Joined: 06 May 2015, 22:53
United Kingdom

Re: Ground Based Air Defence

Post by mr.fred »

Depending on the version of Starstreak, it doesn't necessarily "lock-on" to anything. The darts go where the guidance laser grid is pointed. More recent versions of the launcher may have auto tracking, so they'll track anything that the computer can identify as consistently different from the background. Since it's hit-to-kill, the collateral risk is down range from the target rather than laterally offset from the target.
If you're using LMM then a proximity fuse might be a hazard, but that ought to be mitigated by warhead design.

marktigger
Senior Member
Posts: 4640
Joined: 01 May 2015, 10:22
United Kingdom

Re: Ground Based Air Defence

Post by marktigger »

mr.fred wrote:Depending on the version of Starstreak, it doesn't necessarily "lock-on" to anything. The darts go where the guidance laser grid is pointed. More recent versions of the launcher may have auto tracking, so they'll track anything that the computer can identify as consistently different from the background. Since it's hit-to-kill, the collateral risk is down range from the target rather than laterally offset from the target.
If you're using LMM then a proximity fuse might be a hazard, but that ought to be mitigated by warhead design.
proximity fuze and blast frag were standard features of Blowpipe, Javelin and Starburst (Javelin/S15)

User avatar
shark bait
Senior Member
Posts: 6427
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:18
Pitcairn Island

Re: Ground Based Air Defence

Post by shark bait »

from janes;
Thales UK set to qualify LMM for British Army service

In British Army service, LMM will be integrated on platforms currently equipped with the Thales Starstreak High Velocity Missile (HVM) in a Very Short Range Air Defence (VSHORAD)/Counter-UAS role. These include the FV433 Stormer tracked reconnaissance vehicle, the tri-canister Thales Lightweight Multiple Launcher (LML)-equipped platforms, and the single-canister shoulder-launched variant currently operated by dismounted infantry.
Good news, common sense and commonality prevails.

Surface to surface capability also available.
@LandSharkUK

User avatar
ArmChairCivvy
Senior Member
Posts: 16312
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
United Kingdom

Re: Ground Based Air Defence

Post by ArmChairCivvy »

shark bait wrote: LMM will be integrated on platforms currently equipped with the Thales Starstreak High Velocity Missile (HVM) in a Very Short Range Air Defence (VSHORAD)/Counter-UAS role. These include the FV433 Stormer tracked reconnaissance vehicle, the tri-canister Thales Lightweight Multiple Launcher (LML)-equipped platforms, and the single-canister shoulder-launched variant
Great, the missiles share alot, are compatible with the same launchers... now, as for the differentiators?
- are the guidance systems the same?
- clearly, the slower LMM can only tackle helos & UAVs
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)

User avatar
shark bait
Senior Member
Posts: 6427
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:18
Pitcairn Island

Re: Ground Based Air Defence

Post by shark bait »

Starstreak was specifically designed to counter pop up helos and low aircraft.

Warhead is different, its blast frag, which someone above suggested would be more suitable for UAV's.

Guidance method is the same as Starstreak, they should be interchangeable missiles. I hope this is the start of a multipurpose weapon system perhaps Air Defence units a surface to surface capability, and maybe even IFV's an Air Defence capability. LLM has been proposed for Ajax and Warrior, so it would give them a low yield surface to surface and counter UAV capability.

Hopefully it will end up on wildcat too, it is already paid for after all.
@LandSharkUK

User avatar
ArmChairCivvy
Senior Member
Posts: 16312
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
United Kingdom

Re: Ground Based Air Defence

Post by ArmChairCivvy »

shark bait wrote:Starstreak was specifically designed to counter pop up [attack] helos and low [-flying CAS ] aircraft.
Speed (of reaction, as well as of the missile's time to target) was of essence for Starstreak.

Hence, LLM is different as for
- its speed (of flight)
- the nature of its warhead (heavier; goes with the above?)
- and...?
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)

arfah
Senior Member
Posts: 2173
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 19:02
Niue

Re: Ground Based Air Defence

Post by arfah »

Point to note: FV433 is not a "Stormer."
Admin Note: This user is banned after turning most of their old posts into spam. This is why you may see their posts containing nothing more than dots or symbols. We have decided to keep these posts in place as it shows where they once were and why other users may be replying to things no longer visible in the topic. We apologise for any inconvenience.

marktigger
Senior Member
Posts: 4640
Joined: 01 May 2015, 10:22
United Kingdom

Re: Ground Based Air Defence

Post by marktigger »

could also take on light armour, soft skin vehicles and ships. Might be a useful adjunct to the army Wildcat and Apache

User avatar
Gabriele
Senior Member
Posts: 1998
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:53
Contact:
Italy

Re: Ground Based Air Defence

Post by Gabriele »

arfah wrote:Point to note: FV433 is not a "Stormer."
Yep. Wonder where they got that front. Quite a long way off target...
You might also know me as Liger30, from that great forum than MP.net was.

Arma Pacis Fulcra.
Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum

mr.fred
Senior Member
Posts: 1468
Joined: 06 May 2015, 22:53
United Kingdom

Re: Ground Based Air Defence

Post by mr.fred »

Gabriele wrote:
arfah wrote:Point to note: FV433 is not a "Stormer."
Yep. Wonder where they got that front. Quite a long way off target...
FV4333 is a Stormer.
One keystroke off.

User avatar
Gabriele
Senior Member
Posts: 1998
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:53
Contact:
Italy

Re: Ground Based Air Defence

Post by Gabriele »

The FV433 was the Abbot self-propelled howitzer. It is not even a relative.
You might also know me as Liger30, from that great forum than MP.net was.

Arma Pacis Fulcra.
Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum

marktigger
Senior Member
Posts: 4640
Joined: 01 May 2015, 10:22
United Kingdom

Re: Ground Based Air Defence

Post by marktigger »

arfah wrote:Personally, I feel that other solutions will also be developed to defeat UAV's.

Lasers being an obvious choice although there are other methods.

going after them electronically is a better idea be that jamming or spoofing them

RetroSicotte
Retired Site Admin
Posts: 2657
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:10
United Kingdom

Re: Ground Based Air Defence

Post by RetroSicotte »

The LMM news is legitimately the best news in a long while to me. Love that multi-design into it. Stormers with 4 Starstreaks and 4 LMMs will be a lovely utility device, and give the HVMs more purpose as low cost support weapons to stop expensive Javelins being used on building demolition.

It's wonderfully simplistic. What western weapons get used the least? Anti-air weapons.

What does this give expanded roles for in other areas? Anti-air platforms.

Exactly the sort of multi-purpose a stretched force needs to allow utilisation from arms that previously weren't being utilised to their equipments potential.

User avatar
ArmChairCivvy
Senior Member
Posts: 16312
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
United Kingdom

Re: Ground Based Air Defence

Post by ArmChairCivvy »

Quite agree.

Some punch for the light forces. I wonder if also this THOR launcher will work for both
http://www.armyrecognition.com/images/s ... 40_001.jpg

A Pinzgauer is the heaviest vehicle we can airdrop (until the A400M gets a frame for doing that sort of thing; not a word heard of any such being developed/purchased).
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)

User avatar
shark bait
Senior Member
Posts: 6427
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:18
Pitcairn Island

Re: Ground Based Air Defence

Post by shark bait »

It will, although they call it something else now, they have even proposed fitting it to Ajax and Warrior.
@LandSharkUK

marktigger
Senior Member
Posts: 4640
Joined: 01 May 2015, 10:22
United Kingdom

Re: Ground Based Air Defence

Post by marktigger »

if the LMM/Starstreak systems are compatible and light multi launcher or multi launcher versions are suitable I would suggest that a maritime version could be an option for minor warfare vessels crewed by AR or RMR. And looking at the DS30 with LMM Piggyback you could possibly add starstreak giving a gun missile combination system that could be carried on vehicles.

Dahedd
Member
Posts: 660
Joined: 06 May 2015, 11:18

Re: Ground Based Air Defence

Post by Dahedd »

Is there anything special happening in the highlands at the moment? Waiting for train from Forres to Aberdeen this morning when a convoy of 2 Rapier batteries + escorts drove along the A96. First time I've seen them up here. Been more than the usual air activity over the weekend as well.

User avatar
GibMariner
Senior Member
Posts: 1351
Joined: 12 May 2015, 14:17

Re: Ground Based Air Defence

Post by GibMariner »

Dahedd wrote:Is there anything special happening in the highlands at the moment? Waiting for train from Forres to Aberdeen this morning when a convoy of 2 Rapier batteries + escorts drove along the A96. First time I've seen them up here. Been more than the usual air activity over the weekend as well.
Could it be in advance of Joint/Unmanned Warrior next month?

Post Reply