Gabriele wrote:See the end of this video from MBDA. It shows the Type 23 work as they expect(ed?) it to happen, and it shows the 12 quad-packs slotting in.
Gabriele wrote: All it would take would be replacing the booster section.
ArmChairCivvy wrote:Gabriele wrote: All it would take would be replacing the booster section.
Talking about booster sections, namely adding one to CAMM-ER (for which the developments are driven by Italian rqrmnts?), I wonder if it will still be soft launch?
jonas wrote:In fact if it wasn',t it would surely defeat the whole idea of the maritime version wouldn't it ?
Ron5 wrote:MBDA shows the CAMM-ER model & info.
Ron5 wrote:Not fatter, fits the same width launcher. About one meter longer. CAMM VLS doesn't exist yet so could be any length you like.
shark bait wrote:Ron5 wrote:Not fatter, fits the same width launcher. About one meter longer. CAMM VLS doesn't exist yet so could be any length you like.
MBDA seem to think it's fatter, 190mm Vs 166mm.
CAMM VLS does exist because it's fitted to one of our friates
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 44 guests