Type 23 Frigate (Duke Class) (RN) [News Only]

Contains threads on Royal Navy equipment of the past, present and future.
User avatar
SKB
Senior Member
Posts: 7944
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:35
England

Re: Type 23 Frigate (Duke Class) (RN) [News Only]

Post by SKB »


(Royal Navy)
It's not often a band gets to play under the sea but today The Band of the Royal Yeomanry paid a visit to their affiliate warship HMS St Albans in HMNB Portsmouth - 10 metres below sea level!


Aethulwulf
Senior Member
Posts: 1029
Joined: 23 Jul 2016, 22:46
United Kingdom

Re: Type 23 Frigate (Duke Class) (RN) [News Only]

Post by Aethulwulf »

Google Maps satellite images of HMNB Portsmouth and Devonport have both recently been updated. In both locations you can now see images of Type 23 ships (Argyll? & Westminster?) in the late stage of refits with the Sea Ceptor missile system fitted.

abc123
Senior Member
Posts: 2904
Joined: 10 May 2015, 18:15
United Kingdom

Re: Type 23 Frigate (Duke Class) (RN) [News Only]

Post by abc123 »

The Armchair Soldier wrote:

They might as well fire some Harpoon, she will be out of service next year anyway...
Fortune favors brave sir, said Carrot cheerfully.
What's her position about heavily armed, well prepared and overmanned armies?
Oh, noone's ever heard of Fortune favoring them, sir.
According to General Tacticus, it's because they favor themselves…


User avatar
xav
Senior Member
Posts: 1626
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 22:48

Re: Type 23 Frigate (Duke Class) (RN) [News Only]

Post by xav »

Video: Royal Navy' Successful First Firings of MBDA Sea Ceptor Missile
Image
The first firings of the new Sea Ceptor air defence system have been successfully conducted in a major milestone for the Royal Navy, Defence Minister Harriett Baldwin announced today. The Minister visited defence company MBDA’s site in Filton, near Bristol, meeting with local graduates, apprentices and other employees working on the Sea Ceptor system.

The new air missile defence system can intercept and destroy enemy missiles travelling at supersonic speeds and will form part of the protection for the nation’s new aircraft carriers. The first firings were conducted from Type 23 frigate HMS Argyll whilst off the coast of Scotland.
http://www.navyrecognition.com/index.ph ... ssile.html

Timmymagic
Donator
Posts: 3243
Joined: 07 May 2015, 23:57
United Kingdom

Re: Type 23 Frigate (Duke Class) (RN) [News Only]

Post by Timmymagic »

Finally a Sea Ceptor test firing. It said 'Test 3' in the video as well.

Hopefully all is going well.

Ron5
Donator
Posts: 7311
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:42
United States of America

Re: Type 23 Frigate (Duke Class) (RN) [News Only]

Post by Ron5 »

So protects a 13 mile (20 km) circle with the ship at the center. Interesting.

I wonder if that is a Type 23 statement or one that can be applied to the Type 26. The Type 23 Artisan has about a 30km radar horizon for an incoming sea skimmer. The Type 26 should be able to see 7 or 8 km further due to its increased height.

chinook88
Member
Posts: 47
Joined: 15 Jan 2017, 06:31
Chile

Re: Type 23 Frigate (Duke Class) (RN) [News Only]

Post by chinook88 »

Does it correspond to different tests?


User avatar
ArmChairCivvy
Senior Member
Posts: 16312
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
United Kingdom

Re: Type 23 Frigate (Duke Class) (RN) [News Only]

Post by ArmChairCivvy »

Ron5 wrote:protects a 13 mile (20 km) circle with the ship at the center
The rumour has it that ER doubles that (to 40 km). The nature of these things are that only when export effort goes into overdrive then more exact figures start to be thrown around.
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)

User avatar
SKB
Senior Member
Posts: 7944
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:35
England

Re: Type 23 Frigate (Duke Class) (RN) [News Only]

Post by SKB »


Ron5
Donator
Posts: 7311
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:42
United States of America

Re: Type 23 Frigate (Duke Class) (RN) [News Only]

Post by Ron5 »

ArmChairCivvy wrote:
Ron5 wrote:protects a 13 mile (20 km) circle with the ship at the center
The rumour has it that ER doubles that (to 40 km). The nature of these things are that only when export effort goes into overdrive then more exact figures start to be thrown around.
That's disappointing. I thought this might be a statement about its ability to handle crossing targets but if it's just a mere expression of range ...

RetroSicotte
Retired Site Admin
Posts: 2657
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:10
United Kingdom

Re: Type 23 Frigate (Duke Class) (RN) [News Only]

Post by RetroSicotte »

Bear in mind that CAMM has already been declared as 25+ by MBDA.

So the Royal Navy/MoD saying the equivilent of "20" is very much just an understatement, as usual.

User avatar
ArmChairCivvy
Senior Member
Posts: 16312
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
United Kingdom

Re: Type 23 Frigate (Duke Class) (RN) [News Only]

Post by ArmChairCivvy »

Ron5 wrote:ability to handle crossing targets
It is Mach 3 and most "incoming" do much less, so it's not too bad within that radius

Would be nice to "clock" that launch vid sequence, bearing in mind that the first mile is spent accelerating... so how much of the 20 something range would be left at various incoming angles and approach speeds
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)

indeid
Member
Posts: 271
Joined: 21 May 2015, 20:46

Re: Type 23 Frigate (Duke Class) (RN) [News Only]

Post by indeid »

ArmChairCivvy wrote:
Ron5 wrote:ability to handle crossing targets
It is Mach 3 and most "incoming" do much less, so it's not too bad within that radius

Would be nice to "clock" that launch vid sequence, bearing in mind that the first mile is spent accelerating... so how much of the 20 something range would be left at various incoming angles and approach speeds
I'm hoping that sort of Pk data is well hidden away!!

It's a good point though, with so many variables in missile performance it's nearly impossible to compare systems from open source.

Launch range against a fast, non manovering inbound target will be very different to a target turning defensive.

Nice to see it progressing, next launch from the back of a truck?

User avatar
SKB
Senior Member
Posts: 7944
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:35
England

Re: Type 23 Frigate (Duke Class) (RN) [News Only]

Post by SKB »


^ HMS Argyll arrives in London's docklands for the 2017 DSEI event
https://twitter.com/DSEI_event

Normal speed:

Ron5
Donator
Posts: 7311
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:42
United States of America

Re: Type 23 Frigate (Duke Class) (RN) [News Only]

Post by Ron5 »

Handsome class. I wonder if she still has the soot stains from the CAMM launches :-)

User avatar
ArmChairCivvy
Senior Member
Posts: 16312
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
United Kingdom

Re: Type 23 Frigate (Duke Class) (RN) [News Only]

Post by ArmChairCivvy »

Ron5 wrote:the soot stains from the CAMM launches :-)
CO2? Is it not... before the rocket ignition
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)

Ron5
Donator
Posts: 7311
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:42
United States of America

Re: Type 23 Frigate (Duke Class) (RN) [News Only]

Post by Ron5 »

ArmChairCivvy wrote:
Ron5 wrote:the soot stains from the CAMM launches :-)
CO2? Is it not... before the rocket ignition
Dunno what it is, all I've seen is box under piston labelled gas generator. But all explosives are gas generators aren't they?

PS I was making a joke. They'll be pumping CAMM for all it's worth. And they should. Sounds like a great system.

User avatar
ArmChairCivvy
Senior Member
Posts: 16312
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
United Kingdom

Re: Type 23 Frigate (Duke Class) (RN) [News Only]

Post by ArmChairCivvy »

Ron5 wrote: pumping CAMM for all it's worth. And they should. Sounds like a great system.
It is ... a pity that in the world of war (kit) there are no patents; now anyone can put effective SaMs on much smaller hulls... more importantly, on small-ish hulls without dominating the rest of the lay-out, because the "small" ones normally have some other primary function
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)

User avatar
shark bait
Senior Member
Posts: 6427
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:18
Pitcairn Island

Re: Type 23 Frigate (Duke Class) (RN) [News Only]

Post by shark bait »

That CAMM video is great, that cold launch and rotate looks fantastic. It's a very neat system they've developed and already doing well on the export market, I'm sure more will follow when it makes it into service.

A 20km interception range sounds fully reasonable. At most a sea skimmer is going to be detected at 40km, so once response time and flight time have been accounted for the incoming missile will very likely be within 20km, so I don't see a massive advantage with CAMM-ER.
@LandSharkUK

User avatar
shark bait
Senior Member
Posts: 6427
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:18
Pitcairn Island

Re: Type 23 Frigate (Duke Class) (RN) [News Only]

Post by shark bait »

ArmChairCivvy wrote:CO2? Is it not... before the rocket ignition
It's not CO2 as in a compressed CO2 bottle, the pressure for that would be enormous. It's a lot like the explosive charge found in air bags, to generate high pressure gas very quickly. A quick google tells me airbags generate Nitrogen gas, so I guess the CAMM launch generates a hot Nitrogen mix when launching.
@LandSharkUK

User avatar
ArmChairCivvy
Senior Member
Posts: 16312
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
United Kingdom

Re: Type 23 Frigate (Duke Class) (RN) [News Only]

Post by ArmChairCivvy »

ArmChairCivvy wrote: put effective SaMs on much smaller hulls... more importantly, on small-ish hulls without dominating the rest of the lay-out,
This is how it works
"
reach the required turnover altitude and velocity within the specified time constraint (approximately 1 second from missile first movement).

The missile will incorporate a lateral thruster system, containing 8 thrusters in linked pairs to provide pitch,yaw and roll control, which will
be initiated on exit from the launch tube. The thruster unit will be powered by an independent, annular, on-board gas supply and actuated
via linkages to the fin servo system."

So, there is an overhead as the gas is applied in a two stage process (out first, then turn). Unclear to me how the initial turn angle is communicated, probably by wire and the "black boxes" on the ship superstructure only kick in for mid-course help, so that the radar cone can capture the target and do the final homing. As we have discussed earlier, the method does not reserve radar capacity as in the older "fire-control channel" solutions. Unfortunately the spec does not divulge which gas/ gas mix is used. But it is quite remarkable as the missile goes from standstill to 55 g's and back to 2-3 (the moment the rocket motor ignites) within ONE second.
- a benefit overlooked is that soft launch in this way can be done (for an unchanged missile size) with 30% shorter VLS
- how many decks does the "biggie" version of MK41 - that everyone hankers after - penetrate?
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)

Ron5
Donator
Posts: 7311
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:42
United States of America

Re: Type 23 Frigate (Duke Class) (RN) [News Only]

Post by Ron5 »

You're mixing up two things. The propellant & system to eject the missile is quite independent from the mechanism to flip.

Your description is also backwards, you mean to say the missile starts at 55g then slows to 2-3g before the flip.

The missile is "instructed" which way (direction & angle) to fire before launch i.e. "head out that way at this angle and expect further directions via DL"

User avatar
ArmChairCivvy
Senior Member
Posts: 16312
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
United Kingdom

Re: Type 23 Frigate (Duke Class) (RN) [News Only]

Post by ArmChairCivvy »

ArmChairCivvy wrote: So, there is an overhead as the gas is applied in a two stage process (out first, then turn).
Admittedly bad wording, trying to keep it short:
"Out" with a gas source external to the missile
"Flip" with the linked pairs of thrusters and internal gas source; that's the overhead (in the missile). NOT having to manage the hot gas efflux , however, saves 30 % in the silo length, meaning that deck intrusion is less, meaning that either on a big vessel more choices to place the missiles are opened up or, on smaller vessels, they can take such weapons 9 instead of something less effective, like an auto-cannon)l
Ron5 wrote:Your description is also backwards, you mean to say the missile starts at 55g then slows to 2-3g before the flip.
I don't think it is backwards at all:
- standstill at zero milliseconds (ms)
- 55 g at 35 ms
- the handover point at 100 ms (1 second) and the g's have gone (momentarily) down to 2-3
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)

Post Reply