I understand your argument. But I just have a different opinion. That's it.shark bait wrote:The middle zone is dangerous, the Navy do not need a Snatch Land Rover at sea. Do our service personnel justice, give them the equipment to fight and win, or do not send them at all.
The T31 is corner cutting to the extreme, not even the Brazilian could fit their crap ship inside the Brits budget. Either do a proper job and make it a real frigate, or don't bother at all and make it a simple utility platform.
shark bait wrote: developments appear to be slowing while other press on.
shark bait wrote:Is that the sonar its pulling?
donald_of_tokyo wrote:How about 6 of these kind of ships (may be with 5-10m hull with larger accommodation) for "lower" half of MHC part?
Meanwhile, I'm proposing 3 Bay-like LSD (shall be 70% in size to make it cheaper) for higher half of MHC.
shark bait wrote:The RN needs a bunch of simple commercially delivered platforms for mine clearance and survey tasks.
shark bait wrote:What on earth is a "real capability"? And what is so special about Venari that generates "real capability"?
xav wrote:Steller Systems & Thales new TX ship concept.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Tinplate Turleigh and 33 guests