Should the royal navy have a real hospital ship?
Re: Should the royal navy have a real hospital ship?
I already have, and have shown exactly where it should be if it existed. But it doesn't exist. It seems that this is an urban myth based on a misreading of Article 9 of the 3rd Hague Convention, which as I have said we did not ratify in any case.
If cannot be arsed to actually back up your assertion with a link to the law which is publicly available for all to see, but instead gesture vaguely at hearsay, why should we be bothered to listen to the assertion in the first place? At the moment your argument goes "we shouldn't build a hospital ship because a bloke down the pub told me we shouldn't".
If cannot be arsed to actually back up your assertion with a link to the law which is publicly available for all to see, but instead gesture vaguely at hearsay, why should we be bothered to listen to the assertion in the first place? At the moment your argument goes "we shouldn't build a hospital ship because a bloke down the pub told me we shouldn't".
Re: Should the royal navy have a real hospital ship?
I am minded to agree with Arfah but I too can't be arsed to embark on an exercise in semantics. Cue putting kids to bed and Mulled wine I think!
Re: Should the royal navy have a real hospital ship?
There are a number of issues discussed that are addressed in the 1949 obligations on hospital ships by combatants , that is more up to date ,I found it curious that it seemed to read first aid and such on warships were somehow exempt from being targetted by another combatant
Re: Should the royal navy have a real hospital ship?
-<>-<>-<>-
Admin Note: This user is banned after turning most of their old posts into spam. This is why you may see their posts containing nothing more than dots or symbols. We have decided to keep these posts in place as it shows where they once were and why other users may be replying to things no longer visible in the topic. We apologise for any inconvenience.
- shark bait
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6427
- Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:18
Re: Should the royal navy have a real hospital ship?
I don't think something like that could legally be classed as a hospital ship. Something similar to the Canberra has a clear use for projecting military power and therefore couldn't be a hospital ship. I do believe the ships have a reasonably large medical facilities on board, but they are not afforded the same protection as a hospital ship.seaspear wrote:I was thinking along the lines of something of a similar size to a Canberra class with modifications allowing easy conversion when required to a large hospital facility/ship when needed , and had all of that classes capabilities after modifications changed again
@LandSharkUK
Re: Should the royal navy have a real hospital ship?
Article 22 16.1 requires ten days notice to the combatants of the use of a vessel as a hospital ship, 170.2 allows the ship and it does mention with the usage of misiles being deflected into the path of a hospital the allowance of purely deflective means of self defence ,Im not able to find a section that sets out what a hospital ship cant be and whether an obvious surplus military ship cant be converted for the duration of these hostilities , we need a lawyer on this
- shark bait
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6427
- Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:18
Re: Should the royal navy have a real hospital ship?
I wasn't necessarily speaking legally, just sailing a LHD around close to a battle is going to look suspicious.seaspear wrote:Article 22 16.1 requires ten days notice to the combatants of the use of a vessel as a hospital ship, 170.2 allows the ship and it does mention with the usage of misiles being deflected into the path of a hospital the allowance of purely deflective means of self defence ,Im not able to find a section that sets out what a hospital ship cant be and whether an obvious surplus military ship cant be converted for the duration of these hostilities , we need a lawyer on this
In a real battle a hosptal ship cannot take part in any other role, so using your valuable LHD in a hospital role is probably a bad idea.
I think we do need a lawyer!ARTICLE 33. - vessels which have been transformed into hospital ships cannot be put to any other use throughout the duration of hostilities.
@LandSharkUK
Re: Should the royal navy have a real hospital ship?
On the international register of hospital ships is the San Guisto l9894 also a lhd of the Italian navy that though not technically a hospital ship is registered for that use and can be converted to that use
Re: Should the royal navy have a real hospital ship?
Fact3 is not a fact, in fact it's not true. Here are the exact and only reasons for which a hospital ship can lose its protected status (Article 35 of 1949 GENEVA CONVENTION (II) FOR AMELIORATION OF CONDITION OF WOUNDED, SICK, SHIPWRECKED MEMBERS OF ARMED FORCES AT SEA):arfah wrote:Fact3: A hospital ship cannot send those deemed Hors de Combat back to combat without risking its protected status.
It is absolutely fine for a hospital ship to allow patients to return to their duties once they are well, and in doing so they lose their hors de combat status. If they have been captured and are POWs, they're not going to be released back to the enemy to fight - that is a different situation and has nothing to do with hospital ships per se.The following conditions shall not be considered as depriving hospital ships or sick-bays of vessels of the protection due to them:
1. The fact that the crews of ships or sick-bays are armed for the maintenance of order, for their own defence or that of the sick and wounded.
2. The presence on board of apparatus exclusively intended to facilitate navigation or communication.
3. The discovery on board hospital ships or in sick-bays of portable arms and ammunition taken from the wounded, sick and shipwrecked and not yet handed to the proper service.
4. The fact that the humanitarian activities of hospital ships and sickbays of vessels or of the crews extend to the care of wounded, sick or shipwrecked civilians.
5. The transport of equipment and of personnel intended exclusively for medical duties, over and above the normal requirements.
NB (2) above includes the whole thing about cryptography not being allowed aboard hospital ships, if you were wondering.
Re: Should the royal navy have a real hospital ship?
So it might be that a ship like a lhd may be disarmed painted white with red croses registered as a hospital ship, advanced notice of ten days given to all combatants and be acceptable in that role providing it conforms with the legal requirements of its conduct as a hospital ship
Re: Should the royal navy have a real hospital ship?
Absolutely. As to how difficult it would be to disarm (including complete removal of all cryptographic equipment) such a vessel at short notice, that's another question.seaspear wrote:So it might be that a ship like a lhd may be disarmed painted white with red croses registered as a hospital ship, advanced notice of ten days given to all combatants and be acceptable in that role providing it conforms with the legal requirements of its conduct as a hospital ship
- shark bait
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6427
- Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:18
Re: Should the royal navy have a real hospital ship?
From the SDSR fact sheet, commenting on joint force 2025
Going to become difficult with Argus being withdrawn in 2024, and no replacement plan as yet.Continuing to provide world-class Defence Medical Services at home and on operations.
@LandSharkUK
- Engaging Strategy
- Member
- Posts: 775
- Joined: 20 Dec 2015, 13:45
- Contact:
Re: Should the royal navy have a real hospital ship?
Might see some of the more long term items appear as part of the national shipbuilding strategy to be announced later this year. Might see Argus run for a few years beyond 2024, but she'll probably be replaced soon after the SSS programme completes and yard space is freed up.shark bait wrote:Going to become difficult with Argus being withdrawn in 2024, and no replacement plan as yet.
Blog: http://engagingstrategy.blogspot.co.uk
Twitter: @EngageStrategy1
Twitter: @EngageStrategy1
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4640
- Joined: 01 May 2015, 10:22
Re: Should the royal navy have a real hospital ship?
and they can have a "guard force" who are armed as medical are allowed to carry personal weapons for the protection of themselves and their casualties.
However whether this would include self defence systems like CIWS would be interesting to look at under internetional law.
However whether this would include self defence systems like CIWS would be interesting to look at under internetional law.
- Engaging Strategy
- Member
- Posts: 775
- Joined: 20 Dec 2015, 13:45
- Contact:
Re: Should the royal navy have a real hospital ship?
You could probably justify CIWS as a purely defensive system. Don't you have to regularly announce the location of a hospital ship to all warring parties (so it shouldn't be near your fleet, and therefore having missiles fired at it, anyway)?
Blog: http://engagingstrategy.blogspot.co.uk
Twitter: @EngageStrategy1
Twitter: @EngageStrategy1
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4640
- Joined: 01 May 2015, 10:22
Re: Should the royal navy have a real hospital ship?
it has to be in a defined geographic area from memory.
Re: Should the royal navy have a real hospital ship?
CIWS for Hospital Ships has been mooted in the US before but generally there's not been the desire to test the limits of Geneva's Hospital Ship rules. At least to the present day.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4102
- Joined: 15 Dec 2017, 10:25
Re: Should the royal navy have a real hospital ship?
That's more like it
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... zones.html
I will believe when I see it....
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... zones.html
I will believe when I see it....
Re: Should the royal navy have a real hospital ship?
Indeed. Now make them into a floating medical school and use some of the aid money to help train more doctors and nurses for the NHS (win win for both defence and the NHS)
The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty.
Winston Churchill
Winston Churchill
- shark bait
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6427
- Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:18
Re: Should the royal navy have a real hospital ship?
An interesting proposal, but it sounds like they'll have to do some serious rule bending to get it through, so much so I would guess this turns into vapourware
Whilst it's not an amphibious assault platform, it could work well as a sea base for lower intensity tasks like delivering aid.
Perhaps they should look at your point class concept.Poiuytrewq wrote:That's more like it
Whilst it's not an amphibious assault platform, it could work well as a sea base for lower intensity tasks like delivering aid.
@LandSharkUK
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4102
- Joined: 15 Dec 2017, 10:25
Re: Should the royal navy have a real hospital ship?
I'm not sure who it was that claimed it was an Amphibious Assault platform? I see them as being multipurpose support vessels that would excel in the transportation of troops/vehicles and helicopters AFTER the initial assault phase.shark bait wrote:Perhaps they should look at your point class concept.
Whilst it's not an amphibious assault platform, it could work well as a sea base for lower intensity tasks like delivering aid.
One thing I am sure of is that they are too versatile and cost effective to ignore. Getting the optimum Hi/Lo mix is difficult, I think modified points could have a lot to offer.
- ArmChairCivvy
- Senior Member
- Posts: 16312
- Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
Re: Should the royal navy have a real hospital ship?
Would having a roll-on Primary Casualty Receiving facility be a "first" or has it been done anywhere before?Poiuytrewq wrote:Getting the optimum Hi/Lo mix is difficult, I think modified points could have a lot to offer.
- the so-called "ship's services" needed might be quite extensive and would need to be pre-installed, as opposed to driving AFVs or containerised supplies through that same space
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4102
- Joined: 15 Dec 2017, 10:25
Re: Should the royal navy have a real hospital ship?
Good question. I'm not aware of any globally.ArmChairCivvy wrote:Would having a roll-on Primary Casualty Receiving facility be a "first" or has it been done anywhere before?
This is something many of us have been suggesting for a long time. I am hoping Ms Mordaunt is proposing two general purpose HADR platforms rather than 2 dedicated hospital ships.
With an unlimited budget within reason, what would an optimised HADR platform with extensive PCRS facilities actually look like?
How much aviation?
How many landing spots?
Well dock, steel beach or Ro Ro?
LCU's, mexefloates or both?
How capable should the medical facility actually be?
What size of vehicle and cargo facilities are required?
Lots of questions, requires a bit of thought.....
Re: Should the royal navy have a real hospital ship?
A list of very valid questions, and one that will probably keep such a programme in the Assessment phase for years to come. In the mean time lets build some of those Dutch Bays with reasonable Hospital facilities already designed in, I wonder if these could be spun as actual Hospital ships, at least the Johan de Witts if operated by the RFA.
- ArmChairCivvy
- Senior Member
- Posts: 16312
- Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
Re: Should the royal navy have a real hospital ship?
Well, they (I am not saying "she", as she only recently landed there) don't even know how to spend it... so "unlimited" in that sensePoiuytrewq wrote:I am hoping Ms Mordaunt is proposing two general purpose HADR platforms rather than 2 dedicated hospital ships.
With an unlimited budget within reason
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)