I agree, but would develop that further: The Times also published a rehash of what they had missed out on earlier (they didnt want to copy an army piece by another newspaper at the time; Daily Flail of all things, if my memory serves).R686 wrote:sounds like someone's letting their imagination run wild in the media.
- so the Editor-in-Chief knew this was going to come into focus in the Parliament and told the staff to brush up the image (of The Times keeping up with defence matters)