Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Contains threads on Royal Navy equipment of the past, present and future.
Ron5
Donator
Posts: 7291
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:42
United States of America

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Ron5 »

shark bait wrote:
imperialman wrote:Note Vixen taking on AEW from Merlin.
Good to see theirs something pointing in that direction. AEW from Merlin is the biggest weakness in the carrier groups defence.
Don't hold your breath on that :D

Scimitar54
Senior Member
Posts: 1714
Joined: 13 Jul 2015, 05:10
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Scimitar54 »

Project “Crystal Ball” might become appropriate, but of course no “Control”. :mrgreen:

topman
Member
Posts: 776
Joined: 07 May 2015, 20:56
Tokelau

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by topman »

Ron5 wrote:
topman wrote:I wonder how much of all this will remain a marketing drawing.
A lot of countries are running lots of loyal wingman type programs so I think it's a pretty safe bet we'll be seeing them. Probably sooner rather than later.
On a UK aircraft carrier, we'll see I suppose.

SW1
Senior Member
Posts: 5761
Joined: 27 Aug 2018, 19:12
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by SW1 »

This will bring a flood of comments

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/14651188/ ... beth-leak/

THE Navy’s flagship aircraft carrier has sprung a leak — just weeks before she sets off on her maiden round-the-world voyage.

Thousands of gallons of salt water flooded the 65,000-ton HMS Queen Elizabeth as she sailed from Portsmouth to Scotland last month.

Ron5
Donator
Posts: 7291
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:42
United States of America

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Ron5 »

topman wrote:
Ron5 wrote:
topman wrote:I wonder how much of all this will remain a marketing drawing.
A lot of countries are running lots of loyal wingman type programs so I think it's a pretty safe bet we'll be seeing them. Probably sooner rather than later.
On a UK aircraft carrier, we'll see I suppose.
Nearly forgot you were RAF.

Ron5
Donator
Posts: 7291
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:42
United States of America

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Ron5 »

SW1 wrote:This will bring a flood of comments

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/14651188/ ... beth-leak/

THE Navy’s flagship aircraft carrier has sprung a leak — just weeks before she sets off on her maiden round-the-world voyage.

Thousands of gallons of salt water flooded the 65,000-ton HMS Queen Elizabeth as she sailed from Portsmouth to Scotland last month.
Labour’s Stephen Morgan looks a right shower.

topman
Member
Posts: 776
Joined: 07 May 2015, 20:56
Tokelau

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by topman »

Ron5 wrote:
topman wrote:
Ron5 wrote:
topman wrote:I wonder how much of all this will remain a marketing drawing.
A lot of countries are running lots of loyal wingman type programs so I think it's a pretty safe bet we'll be seeing them. Probably sooner rather than later.
On a UK aircraft carrier, we'll see I suppose.
Nearly forgot you were RAF.
I'm not sure what my job has to do with the chances of them ever operating off a UK carrier?

downsizer
Member
Posts: 896
Joined: 02 May 2015, 08:03

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by downsizer »

topman wrote:
Ron5 wrote:
topman wrote:
Ron5 wrote:
topman wrote:I wonder how much of all this will remain a marketing drawing.
A lot of countries are running lots of loyal wingman type programs so I think it's a pretty safe bet we'll be seeing them. Probably sooner rather than later.
On a UK aircraft carrier, we'll see I suppose.
Nearly forgot you were RAF.
I'm not sure what my job has to do with the chances of them ever operating off a UK carrier?
Nothing of course, but cheap shots and trolling feed his know it all ego.

inch
Senior Member
Posts: 1313
Joined: 27 May 2015, 21:35

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by inch »

Just been having another thought experiment today (slow day) but could a qe class be lengthened by having a middle section inserted ,not saying it needs one some say are too big anyway but could it be done or just impossible now ? Thanks

serge750
Senior Member
Posts: 1080
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:34
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by serge750 »

If enough money was found anything is possible...lots of the carriers after WW2 had major refits with angled decks putting lifts in different places etc,

Not sure but i think HMS Victorious ( R38 ) had the most done to her...?

Timmymagic
Donator
Posts: 3230
Joined: 07 May 2015, 23:57
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Timmymagic »

inch wrote:Just been having another thought experiment today (slow day) but could a qe class be lengthened by having a middle section inserted ,not saying it needs one some say are too big anyway but could it be done or just impossible now ? Thanks
Yes, and its reasonably common in the civilian world. But...it would affect the hull form, handling and stability of the ship so would need to be done with a lot of care. It would obviously take a while and cost a fortune as well...

Ron5
Donator
Posts: 7291
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:42
United States of America

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Ron5 »

Timmymagic wrote:
inch wrote:Just been having another thought experiment today (slow day) but could a qe class be lengthened by having a middle section inserted ,not saying it needs one some say are too big anyway but could it be done or just impossible now ? Thanks
Yes, and its reasonably common in the civilian world. But...it would affect the hull form, handling and stability of the ship so would need to be done with a lot of care. It would obviously take a while and cost a fortune as well...
I don't think there is anywhere in the UK this could be done but I can't think of any reason why not.

User avatar
ETH
Member
Posts: 71
Joined: 08 Apr 2021, 23:28
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by ETH »

Ron5 wrote:I don't think there is anywhere in the UK this could be done but I can't think of any reason why not.
What’s wrong with Rosyth?

Ron5
Donator
Posts: 7291
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:42
United States of America

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Ron5 »

ETH wrote:
Ron5 wrote:I don't think there is anywhere in the UK this could be done but I can't think of any reason why not.
What’s wrong with Rosyth?
Dock not long enough surely?

User avatar
ETH
Member
Posts: 71
Joined: 08 Apr 2021, 23:28
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by ETH »

Ron5 wrote:
ETH wrote:
Ron5 wrote:I don't think there is anywhere in the UK this could be done but I can't think of any reason why not.
What’s wrong with Rosyth?
Dock not long enough surely?
Depends how much of an extension we’re talking. The QE class as it is now was not the longest iteration in the design process. The dock they were assembled in is about 320m long so gives some more wiggle room.

inch
Senior Member
Posts: 1313
Joined: 27 May 2015, 21:35

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by inch »

Cheers you guys ,like I said before don't think needs it or would happen but just wondered if possible ,and by your answers it could be possible ,50yrs service life along time and I quess we never know what future plans might be needed say 30 yrs from now ,so there is lots of scope if you guys are correct , cheers

SW1
Senior Member
Posts: 5761
Joined: 27 Aug 2018, 19:12
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by SW1 »

The main dock at Harland and Wolff Belfast is 550m long the second dock 350m.

User avatar
ETH
Member
Posts: 71
Joined: 08 Apr 2021, 23:28
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by ETH »

SW1 wrote:The main dock at Harland and Wolff Belfast is 550m long the second dock 350m.
Could say it’s... Titanic?

Ron5
Donator
Posts: 7291
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:42
United States of America

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Ron5 »

You would, in theory, need dock large enough for the carrier to be cut in two, the halves pulled apart to leave enough room for the new center block to be built in situ before pushing them all back together. The dock would also need to have enough infrastructure to support building a new block and a skilled workforce.

We're talking about a dock upwards of 400m in length in an active shipyard. I don't think there is such a location in the UK.

Jdam
Member
Posts: 932
Joined: 09 May 2015, 22:26
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Jdam »

Image

Busy few months coming up for the Queen Elizabeth. :thumbup:

I dont know why but I thought the Price of Wales was scheduled for Joint Warrior. I must be that desperate to see her back at sea I am getting confused.

serge750
Senior Member
Posts: 1080
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:34
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by serge750 »

Interesting they may send 2 ships the black sea....

serge750
Senior Member
Posts: 1080
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:34
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by serge750 »

Ron5 wrote:You would, in theory, need dock large enough for the carrier to be cut in two, the halves pulled apart to leave enough room for the new center block to be built in situ before pushing them all back together. The dock would also need to have enough infrastructure to support building a new block and a skilled workforce.

We're talking about a dock upwards of 400m in length in an active shipyard. I don't think there is such a location in the UK.
Could they not cut a QEC were they wanted to put the block in, then float out the rear section then float in a pre made section ( from portsmouth? as an example ) weld it in place then float in the rear section? heck of Lot of work would be involved

Be better ( maybe cheaper, if no bells n whistles ) of building a smaller 3rd flat top to replace HMS Ocean :D but interesting idea

Jdam
Member
Posts: 932
Joined: 09 May 2015, 22:26
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Jdam »

serge750 wrote:Interesting they may send 2 ships the black sea....
Wonder if that may accelerate someones plans for their forces in the area?

abc123
Senior Member
Posts: 2903
Joined: 10 May 2015, 18:15
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by abc123 »

serge750 wrote:Interesting they may send 2 ships the black sea....
Someone allways don't get's the memo... :lol:
Fortune favors brave sir, said Carrot cheerfully.
What's her position about heavily armed, well prepared and overmanned armies?
Oh, noone's ever heard of Fortune favoring them, sir.
According to General Tacticus, it's because they favor themselves…

serge750
Senior Member
Posts: 1080
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:34
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by serge750 »

Just very surprised they will send 2 ships instead of 1 to the black sea, Could the whole QEC group go to the black sea for a week or so, as a show of commitment to the region or would that be overdoing it...

Post Reply