Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
- Tempest414
- Senior Member
- Posts: 5623
- Joined: 04 Jan 2018, 23:39
Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
The simple fact that a British lead CSG is in the Pacific will have the attention of China and it will bluster away all day long we have already stated our intention by sending a Carrier to that part of the world on its first deployment and just by the fact it is there is enough. For me the way forward is to send a type 23 as part of escort group on a 12 mile FON detachment in the SCS
Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
What he's likely referring to is it was made clear they wouldn't pass through the Taiwan Strait before the CSG even deployed.Lord Jim wrote: Interesting choice of words. By sailing in any waters claimed by China you are by default being confrontational. I don't think anyone expected the Carrier Group to sail a few miles of one of the artificial islands built by China but they seem to have acted in a way far more conservatively, studiously avoiding any waters that China lay claim to, even a very small 10 mile stretch.
Sailing in the SCS will get some complaints from the PRC but transiting the Taiwan Strait is what gets you a mock PLAAF/PLAN strike coming in. Both are confrontational but both are very different in terms of scale, it's not an 'on-off' thing.
-
- Member
- Posts: 345
- Joined: 04 May 2015, 19:00
Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
I don't think that is true when you look at how much China claimsLord Jim wrote:studiously avoiding any waters that China lay claim to, even a very small 10 mile stretch.
.
They aren't going within 12 miles of any disputed island, or even close to that it is true, but I think they are going through that disputed area. Though I am not sure, and I doubt many others outside the 2 navies and governments are either
Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
With no US carrier group currently deployed in the Western Pacific, You can bet the military brass at the Pentagon and our Australian friends have no wish whatsoever for the Brits to go stirring up a hornets nest with China at the current time.
Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
Perhaps other countries in that region whose sea boundaries are ignored by China should be more involved in this?
Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
They don't really have sufficient resources to compete with China. One of the best things that the West could do to bolster them is to move manufacturing from China to other countries in the region. They will still make the savings they seek, but will be putting money into their economies, rather than the Chinese economyseaspear wrote:Perhaps other countries in that region whose sea boundaries are ignored by China should be more involved in this?
The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty.
Winston Churchill
Winston Churchill
Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
You have Japan, South Korea, certainly making sizable naval platforms Singapore has also invested heavily in its defence .
Indonesia is seemingly starting to develop but has appeared ad hoc in its defence purchases, though I believe one thing that would go a long way is for South Korea and Japan to finally settle some differences over Japans conduct in the second world war if these two countries were able to be part of joint exercises more often as they were in Talisman Sabre back in July Beijing would take notice
Indonesia is seemingly starting to develop but has appeared ad hoc in its defence purchases, though I believe one thing that would go a long way is for South Korea and Japan to finally settle some differences over Japans conduct in the second world war if these two countries were able to be part of joint exercises more often as they were in Talisman Sabre back in July Beijing would take notice
- Tempest414
- Senior Member
- Posts: 5623
- Joined: 04 Jan 2018, 23:39
Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
A bit off topic but the US lost cred when they walked out on the Kurd's these smaller players will patrol there waters as they see them but wont poke China out side this
Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
Given the deteriorating security situation in Afghanistan, what are the bets that CSG21 gets recalled to that area sooner than we think?
Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/14739 ... royal-navyChinese nuclear attack subs 'stalking' Britain's new aircraft carrier across Pacific
(BTW I don't normally read the Mail)
- Tempest414
- Senior Member
- Posts: 5623
- Joined: 04 Jan 2018, 23:39
Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
If they wasn't they wouldn't be doing there job now would theyJ. Tattersall wrote:https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/14739 ... royal-navyChinese nuclear attack subs 'stalking' Britain's new aircraft carrier across Pacific
(BTW I don't normally read the Mail)
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 2762
- Joined: 03 Aug 2016, 20:29
Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
The shame is we'll never know how well we were doing our job - 3 detected, but how many were there? 3 or more?Tempest414 wrote:If they wasn't they wouldn't be doing there job now would theyJ. Tattersall wrote:https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/14739 ... royal-navyChinese nuclear attack subs 'stalking' Britain's new aircraft carrier across Pacific
(BTW I don't normally read the Mail)
- Tempest414
- Senior Member
- Posts: 5623
- Joined: 04 Jan 2018, 23:39
Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
They have 12 so three to this task is about it as they will need 2 for the 2 carrier groups and working the rule of 3 with 3 on station 3 working up/ training and 3 in maintenance
Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
A mistake to admit that the Chinese were detected. Far better to give the Chinese false peace of mind and not to give away our detection capabilities. They will now be adapting their tech and tactics accordingly. Let's hope we had them pinged at far greater range than we have admitted in public.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1716
- Joined: 13 Jul 2015, 05:10
Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
Unless they were detected from a very long distance and only made aware of it (lulled by a false sense of security), when they were “allowed” to get reasonably close.
Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
Not the first time P.L.A.N submarines have got close or been speculated on
https://www.popularmechanics.com/milita ... t-carrier/
This could be interesting if the carriers meet up
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/4 ... -china-sea
https://www.popularmechanics.com/milita ... t-carrier/
This could be interesting if the carriers meet up
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/4 ... -china-sea
- Tempest414
- Senior Member
- Posts: 5623
- Joined: 04 Jan 2018, 23:39
Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
Well as CSG21 is in port in Guam not likely for now
- Tempest414
- Senior Member
- Posts: 5623
- Joined: 04 Jan 2018, 23:39
Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
In a matter of days this has changed with two USN carrier strike groups deploying to the region in the last few days so along with CSG21 this would make 3 carrier strike groups in the Western Pacific . However as said the UK has made its statement just by having a carrier strike group in the Pacific it dose not need sail within 12 miles of China or any disputed islands it just needs to go about its business working with allied partnersCooper wrote:With no US carrier group currently deployed in the Western Pacific, You can bet the military brass at the Pentagon and our Australian friends have no wish whatsoever for the Brits to go stirring up a hornets nest with China at the current time.
Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
I'm surprised that the UK has no status of forces agreement with the US.
Fortune favors brave sir, said Carrot cheerfully.
What's her position about heavily armed, well prepared and overmanned armies?
Oh, noone's ever heard of Fortune favoring them, sir.
According to General Tacticus, it's because they favor themselves…
What's her position about heavily armed, well prepared and overmanned armies?
Oh, noone's ever heard of Fortune favoring them, sir.
According to General Tacticus, it's because they favor themselves…
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1716
- Joined: 13 Jul 2015, 05:10
Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
If guilty, both are deserving of a Flogging and dismissal from their ship, in addition to any civil punishment!
Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
Nipper back on board after successfully completing his Phalanx course and a couple of weeks on hols.
Hope he hasn't lost his sea legs whilst being ashore for so long, he'll need them soon enough.
Hope he hasn't lost his sea legs whilst being ashore for so long, he'll need them soon enough.
Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
(HMSQNLZ) 17th August 2021
RAS! 1st time transferring live munitions today, 14,540kg of them! Loaded on from RFA FortVictoria, along with food and aviation fuel, keeping our sailors and jets going at sea!