Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Contains threads on Royal Navy equipment of the past, present and future.
User avatar
SKB
Senior Member
Posts: 7931
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:35
England

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by SKB »


(Navy Lookout/RFA Tideforce) 11th November 2019
Jet takes off from HMS Queen Elizabeth while Replenishment at Sea underway with RFA Tideforce

Image

cpu121
Member
Posts: 29
Joined: 10 May 2015, 02:09

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by cpu121 »

cockneyjock1974 wrote:I take it from episode 3, SRVL is a tricky one. Or perhaps artistic licence from the director. Is it the case that SRVL can only be performed in calm seas/weather or were they playing it cautious?
If anybody can throw some light on this, it would be good. I just hope it’s not a red hearing. I Just feel it should be the norm for QE class landings, engine wear and tear alone.
Don't forget that the flight trials start with a very small, conservative flight envelope and gradually expand it through flying different profiles. Not only would they want the first attempt to be within the permitted envelope for safety reasons but they also needed need it to match the test perimeters so that they can reliably draw conclusions from the data. Coming in too high, too low, too slow, too fast in the early attempts could render the data useless.

The other role of the test pilots is write the book and refine the procedures for other pilots. Everything will have been tested in simulators and on land but inevitably when they get out to the ship they'll discover some areas that need to be tweaked.

In the later stages of testing they can sometimes skip ahead - e.g. when they exploited the bad weather in the previous episode to demonstrate capability in a higher sea state than was planned for that stage of testing.

Timmymagic
Donator
Posts: 3224
Joined: 07 May 2015, 23:57
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Timmymagic »

cpu121 wrote:In the later stages of testing they can sometimes skip ahead - e.g. when they exploited the bad weather in the previous episode to demonstrate capability in a higher sea state than was planned for that stage of testing.
I'm guessing , but I suspect the bad weather was a little early for an SRVL in bad weather. They did mention 20 SRVL's in the programme so its more than likely that they have primarily been done with regard to different speeds, different wind of deck etc. Its doubtful if they were confident enough with those limited number of flights to try much heavier weights or adverse conditions. Be interesting to see if they attempted it at night though.

User avatar
cockneyjock1974
Member
Posts: 537
Joined: 01 May 2015, 09:43
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by cockneyjock1974 »

Thanks for the replies, my naivety, of course they’ll play it safe to start with and as per strict parameters. A question I’ve long thought about and will probably never know due to OPSEC reasons, is can a fully laden (fuel & weapons) F35B take off from the deck of the QE class? If so I would imagine take off would be much closer to the stern.

seaspear
Senior Member
Posts: 1779
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 20:16
Australia

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by seaspear »

Is it possible that they are still in the testing stage to establish operating parameters of the aricraft from the carrier ,another benchmark to be be looked forward to is when one hundred f35b sorties are achieved in a day from the carrier possibly with 24 aircraft

bobp
Senior Member
Posts: 2684
Joined: 06 May 2015, 07:52
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by bobp »

Don't forget a lot of testing has been done on land regarding take of weights, but there is nothing like the real thing.

PhillyJ
Member
Posts: 745
Joined: 01 May 2015, 09:27
England

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by PhillyJ »

Similar to what I've heard as well, although time/date is not confirmed due to tides and the weather.


jcs1959
Member
Posts: 16
Joined: 23 Feb 2017, 17:04
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by jcs1959 »

HMS Queen Elizabeth

@HMSQNLZ
·
6h


11 years between these pictures; the RN has today again launched a jet from a carrier whilst replenishing at sea. This force-multiplier shows the Service's transformation in that time; Invincible to QE class, Wave to Tide class and Harrier to Lightning #WESTLANT19 #backinthegame

This looks like a very useful capability that I imagine would be difficult for a CATOBAR carrier? Along with previous images of 2 F35 landing at the same time some very good force multipliers seem to be brought into use.

User avatar
SKB
Senior Member
Posts: 7931
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:35
England

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by SKB »

Photos for above post by jcs1959
Image
Image

jcs1959
Member
Posts: 16
Joined: 23 Feb 2017, 17:04
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by jcs1959 »

Many thanks for that SKB. Not sure why they didn't load but maybe to do with being from the slide rule generation! Still shows that a RAS won't always stop fast jet flying from the carrier.

Aethulwulf
Senior Member
Posts: 1029
Joined: 23 Jul 2016, 22:46
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Aethulwulf »

The main constraint of RAS is that you are sailing on a fixed bearing and a fixed speed for a long time (could be up to 5 hours).

Of course you need to ensure that you have clear seas ahead of you for the full time of RAS and, if possible, you choose a bearing that is into the wind direction. But wind directions often shift over time.

Flight operations during RAS will depend upon what wind over deck is needed for any launch; during RAS you're stuck with what you've got.

jcs1959
Member
Posts: 16
Joined: 23 Feb 2017, 17:04
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by jcs1959 »

Yes indeed that is true but is even that possible with CATOBAR carriers. Also with the double fuel lines now in use is a RAS always still going to be so time consuming?

Aethulwulf
Senior Member
Posts: 1029
Joined: 23 Jul 2016, 22:46
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Aethulwulf »

During training and testing, RAS requirements are dominated by fuel (and food).

During operations, RAS requirements are dominated by ammunition.

RAS will take place when the magazines / fuel tanks are depleted. Given the size of both on QEC, RAS is always likely to take a good few hours.

The planning assumptions are based around having to supply a QEC operating 36 F35s with X days of fuel and ammunition within a X hours RAS period. From this it was concluded that
1. Fuel RAS and solid stores RAS would need to be conducted simultaneously, on either side of the ship.
2. Fuel RAS would need double fuel lines on two RAS stations.
3. Solid stores RAS would need two heavy (5 T) RAS stations.

Given the reported issues with affordability of FSS, some of these assumptions maybe reviewed or relaxed.

User avatar
SKB
Senior Member
Posts: 7931
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:35
England

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by SKB »

Image
Image
Image
(@HMSQNLZ) 12th November 2019
Welcome to the Queen Elizabeth Carrier Strike Group, USS Philippine Sea and USS Truxtun @USNavy. The Ticonderoga-class guided missile cruiser and Arleigh Burke-class destroyer have joined us as #UKF35 jet trials continue in the USA

bobp
Senior Member
Posts: 2684
Joined: 06 May 2015, 07:52
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by bobp »

Great pictures SKB.

Wrekin1410
Member
Posts: 83
Joined: 29 Jul 2015, 07:28

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Wrekin1410 »

cockneyjock1974 wrote:Thanks for the replies, my naivety, of course they’ll play it safe to start with and as per strict parameters. A question I’ve long thought about and will probably never know due to OPSEC reasons, is can a fully laden (fuel & weapons) F35B take off from the deck of the QE class? If so I would imagine take off would be much closer to the stern.
I notice from the latest photos there are no skid marks from tyres on the deck which would indicate there have been no SRVL landings so far this trip.

It would be interesting to know if there are more planned for later in the trip or there are issues that came up last year that have to be overcome.

User avatar
SKB
Senior Member
Posts: 7931
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:35
England

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by SKB »


Bring Deeps
Donator
Posts: 217
Joined: 27 May 2015, 21:06
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Bring Deeps »

SKB wrote:Photos for above post by jcs1959
Image
Image
The RN are being very thorough in going through the family photo album and recreating the most treasured images.

Still to do; side view of both QE carriers steaming ahead and a QE carrier flirting with two Nimitz class.

As for the FSS ships with this election I expect BJ to promise 4 built in British yards, JC to promise 5 built by the winner of a referendum and NS to promise 6 all built in Leith. JS will say we won't need them as we can rely on our European allies.

User avatar
ArmChairCivvy
Senior Member
Posts: 16312
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by ArmChairCivvy »

Nice pair of photos. Perhaps also an explanation to why the number of helos carried on the latest batch of tankers has gone lower in priorities... as they don't anymore have to compensate for 'overcrowded' hangars on the ships that they support
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)

User avatar
Gabriele
Senior Member
Posts: 1998
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:53
Contact:
Italy

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Gabriele »

Perhaps also an explanation to why the number of helos carried on the latest batch of tankers has gone lower in priorities
You must be thinking of the Forts, actually. And we don't really know how many helos would be on the new Solid Support Ships. I think 2-3 Merlin spaces will still be in the requirement.
As for the tankers, the Tide tankers are better equipped for helos now than they were before, considering that the ROVERs had no hangar at all...
You might also know me as Liger30, from that great forum than MP.net was.

Arma Pacis Fulcra.
Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum

PhillyJ
Member
Posts: 745
Joined: 01 May 2015, 09:27
England

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by PhillyJ »

Seems like PWLS is playing around off Devon, still no official entry time/date from my lad but lead to be believe from past updates it could be very soon.


jcs1959
Member
Posts: 16
Joined: 23 Feb 2017, 17:04
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by jcs1959 »

Aethelwulf, totally agree with all you say about RAS, even with the new transfer capabilities of the Tides and future FSS. I suspect the ability to launch F35 during RAS is more about CAP aircraft on alert 5 or 20 if needed and not about launching strike packages.

Of course you wouldn't plan your RAS within the operational area anyway as has always been the case.

PhillyJ
Member
Posts: 745
Joined: 01 May 2015, 09:27
England

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by PhillyJ »

According to MarineTraffice there are a couple of German Naval vessels in and around PWLS and her current position, possible photo opportunity?

PhillyJ
Member
Posts: 745
Joined: 01 May 2015, 09:27
England

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by PhillyJ »

QHM update for Thursday Shipping movements shows no sign of the channels being closed around the midday HW mark, so that's one of the days my lad told me PWLS might come home crossed off the list. MarineTraffic has her moving away from Torbay and heading towards Portland now.

Post Reply