Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Contains threads on Royal Navy equipment of the past, present and future.
inch
Senior Member
Posts: 1314
Joined: 27 May 2015, 21:35

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by inch »

think ive asked before but can anybody remember when the documentary is going to be on about qe and what channel it will be on ? really looking forward like most on here I quess .thankyou

CameronPerson
Member
Posts: 300
Joined: 09 Apr 2017, 17:03
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by CameronPerson »

inch wrote:think ive asked before but can anybody remember when the documentary is going to be on about qe and what channel it will be on ? really looking forward like most on here I quess .thankyou


It’s a three parter and is called “Carrier Strike” I believe and covers the past few years, should be a good one. I’m glad that the RN and ACA allowed it to be documented. Apparently it’s a two series thing and Terrill be rejoin the ship later this year and cover the rest of the sea trials including flight trials with the Lightning II in the Autumn

inch
Senior Member
Posts: 1314
Joined: 27 May 2015, 21:35

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by inch »

thankyou CameronPerson ,yes sounds great


User avatar
SKB
Senior Member
Posts: 7949
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:35
England

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by SKB »

Might it be a good idea to bring one of those dummy F35s to the QE for deck and lift handling tests too? Or are the RN too frightened of the "Big Lizzie Has Fake Jets" headlines if the newspapers found out?

User avatar
-Eddie-
Member
Posts: 174
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 19:59
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by -Eddie- »

Great to see visual updates on testing, no matter how mundane they may seem. More please!


CameronPerson
Member
Posts: 300
Joined: 09 Apr 2017, 17:03
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by CameronPerson »



Could we be looking at a departure next week in this case? weather permitting of course

CameronPerson
Member
Posts: 300
Joined: 09 Apr 2017, 17:03
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by CameronPerson »



And I’m going with Paveway and Stingray ;)

bobp
Senior Member
Posts: 2703
Joined: 06 May 2015, 07:52
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by bobp »

CameronPerson wrote:And I’m going with Paveway and Stingray
Paveway IV and Stingray.

NickC
Donator
Posts: 1453
Joined: 01 Sep 2017, 14:20
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by NickC »

House of Commons Committee of Public Accounts report on the Carrier Strike Group, CSG, 10 January 2018, a few comments

The two carriers cost holding steady at £6,212. may be minor uplift.

F-35B

i) The 30 a/c ordered to date estimated at £100 m each, total £3 billion in the fantasy world of the MOD where pound buys $1.55, actual rate today is $1.38

ii) A/C whole life cost to 2048 of each jet was £270 million, but MOD admits it had low to medium confidence that these estimates were accurate, historical data suggests four to five times original costs.

Iii) MOD admitted current a/c overweight, UK Tier 1 status ends 2019 so UK priority drops to 4.5% as based on order numbers so UK will not receive any priority for integration of ASRAAM CSM, SPEAR 3 and Meteor, likely will be to sentto back of queue. mid twenties ?

Iv) The cost of the remaining 90 jets is less certain because the Department is still to decide when it will buy them, and whether they will be used for Carrier Strike, F-35Bs or F-35As undecided.

v) £5.8 billion cost of a/c for carriers, numbers not clear, "planned for each carrier to operate up to two squadrons of 12 jets, with the ability to surge to 36. In order to have 24 frontline jets, a multiple of that was needed in the fleet"

Only £0.3 billion in budget for Crowsnest, seems low.

"The Type 26s has been scheduled precisely in line with the Type 23s coming out of service, so that there would be no gap in anti-submarine support to the carriers. Industry is incentivised to deliver the ships to schedule." Ridiculously long time scale and generous payment for BAE if they can meet it. BAE contractual negotiators appear to make MOD look amateurs.

Smokey
Member
Posts: 272
Joined: 18 Feb 2017, 13:33
Cyprus

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Smokey »

bobp wrote:
CameronPerson wrote:And I’m going with Paveway and Stingray
Paveway IV and Stingray.
Bomby McBombface & Torpy McTorpface.

jimthelad
Member
Posts: 510
Joined: 14 May 2015, 20:16
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by jimthelad »

ASRAAM is already integrated with firings complete. Meteor is scheduled for testing 2019 it think but Gab did put a link somewhere in the past.

User avatar
ArmChairCivvy
Senior Member
Posts: 16312
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by ArmChairCivvy »

Typhoons and Rafales will get Meteor this year vs the F-35B's will start to carry them from 2024
- how that is compatible with the UK stock all being uniform (the 'clipped wing') Meteors, someone could perhaps enlighten me. It is of course possible that the statement on that in this http://defense-update.com/20170421_f35_meteor.html has been taken too categorically, and it is, rather, the long-term aspiration?
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)

User avatar
hovematlot
Member
Posts: 268
Joined: 27 May 2015, 17:46
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by hovematlot »

On the subject of weapons on QEC, or her embarked squadrons. As it stands the Invincible class packed a bigger punch in the anti-ship department with the SHAR/Sea Eagle combo that the QEC is planned to carry?

abc123
Senior Member
Posts: 2905
Joined: 10 May 2015, 18:15
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by abc123 »

hovematlot wrote:On the subject of weapons on QEC, or her embarked squadrons. As it stands the Invincible class packed a bigger punch in the anti-ship department with the SHAR/Sea Eagle combo that the QEC is planned to carry?
That's really surprising to hear... :lolno:
Fortune favors brave sir, said Carrot cheerfully.
What's her position about heavily armed, well prepared and overmanned armies?
Oh, noone's ever heard of Fortune favoring them, sir.
According to General Tacticus, it's because they favor themselves…

Timmymagic
Donator
Posts: 3247
Joined: 07 May 2015, 23:57
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Timmymagic »

ArmChairCivvy wrote:how that is compatible with the UK stock all being uniform (the 'clipped wing') Meteors, someone could perhaps enlighten me.
Gab has previously advised that the only difference is the fins, no other changes. As the fins are attached after the missile is removed from its crate its likely we'll just buy 2 sets of fins per missile body.

User avatar
hovematlot
Member
Posts: 268
Joined: 27 May 2015, 17:46
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by hovematlot »

abc123 wrote:
hovematlot wrote:On the subject of weapons on QEC, or her embarked squadrons. As it stands the Invincible class packed a bigger punch in the anti-ship department with the SHAR/Sea Eagle combo that the QEC is planned to carry?
That's really surprising to hear... :lolno:
I'm not sure, but the only light- ish on the horizon is Spear III, but that has a small warhead. It could conduct a saturation attack to make up for the small warhead. But then Sea Eagle could do that too..

User avatar
ArmChairCivvy
Senior Member
Posts: 16312
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by ArmChairCivvy »

As it stands the Invincible class packed a bigger punch in the anti-ship department with the SHAR/Sea Eagle combo that the QEC is planned to carry?
It is true, but the USN has already recognised that they may need to sink enemy ships (again, after a long pause) and I am sure that belatedly we will follow.

Spear3 is not a bad option, as anti-missile defences have come a long way, and of those you can carry many... in order to do a salvo launch
- whether you achieve a sinking or a mission kill is still going to be a better outcome than your "old" missile being shot down by the target

Right, hovematlot got there first...
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)

NickC
Donator
Posts: 1453
Joined: 01 Sep 2017, 14:20
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by NickC »

jimthelad wrote:ASRAAM is already integrated with firings complete. Meteor is scheduled for testing 2019 it think but Gab did put a link somewhere in the past.
The new updated and more capable version of ASRAAM, the CSP, Capability Sustainment Programme, funded by £300 million contract in 2015.

CSP to enter service on Typhoon in 2018, F-35B will soldier on with original ASRAAM till 2022, MOD states cross over to CSP yet to be determined. ASRAAM CSP will require F-35B integration with Block 4 software and as mentioned previously UK at back of the queue with only a 4.5% vote.

Enigmatically
Member
Posts: 345
Joined: 04 May 2015, 19:00

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Enigmatically »

Apologies if I missed it, but I didn't see anyone post this link which has a video of the Merlin being struck down

https://www.facebook.com/HMNBPortsmouth ... BA&fref=nf

bobp
Senior Member
Posts: 2703
Joined: 06 May 2015, 07:52
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by bobp »

Thanks for sharing the above, found myself imagining that sort of operation, with two merlins on the lift whilst underway. I guess that there is a lot of training yet to be done during these trials.

seaspear
Senior Member
Posts: 1779
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 20:16
Australia

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by seaspear »

Without getting into the full deployment of the F35b on board is it known when the carrier could be considered operational although with just rotary craft for deployment

User avatar
Gabriele
Senior Member
Posts: 1998
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:53
Contact:
Italy

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Gabriele »

Interim LPH capable by the end of the summer was the idea, although it is not clear when Chinooks and Apache will get their first go.
You might also know me as Liger30, from that great forum than MP.net was.

Arma Pacis Fulcra.
Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum

User avatar
ArmChairCivvy
Senior Member
Posts: 16312
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by ArmChairCivvy »

Gabriele wrote:Interim LPH capable by the end of the summer was the idea
So we only take a half a year's capability holiday?
- though the Ocean sale to Brazil has not been inked yet? I guess we should only count her out when she is pulling into a dry dock for reconditioning (at the buyer's expense)
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)

Post Reply