Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Contains threads on Royal Navy equipment of the past, present and future.
abc123
Senior Member
Posts: 2903
Joined: 10 May 2015, 18:15
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by abc123 »

SKB wrote: QE Total time: 2 years, 10 months, 19 days (1054 days)


PoW Total time: 3 years, 3 months, 13 days (1200 days)
Why was PoW longer in the dock?
Fortune favors brave sir, said Carrot cheerfully.
What's her position about heavily armed, well prepared and overmanned armies?
Oh, noone's ever heard of Fortune favoring them, sir.
According to General Tacticus, it's because they favor themselves…

benny14
Member
Posts: 556
Joined: 16 Oct 2017, 16:07
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by benny14 »

Not sure why I even read the news. A couple delights that I read on a Sun article today. RIP the days of actual journalism.

"sister ship Big Lizzie sprang a leak"
"was suffering from an embarrassing leak."
"200 litres of sea water pour in every hour.
It’s feared repairs could run into the millions and mean the ship may have to return to dry dock."
"faulty Queen Elizabeth was fitted out."
"It’s pretty important for keeping the water out. It’s leaking at approximately 200 litres an hour which is pretty significant"

User avatar
2HeadsBetter
Member
Posts: 206
Joined: 12 Dec 2015, 16:21
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by 2HeadsBetter »

Pesky facts getting in the way of a good story:

https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/contrac ... tion-work/

"A typical bilge pump even on a narrow boat, by the way, can handle over 1000 litres per hour."

CameronPerson
Member
Posts: 300
Joined: 09 Apr 2017, 17:03
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by CameronPerson »



The Sun could have looked at this story before running with their ridiculous faux outrage piece on QE. All ships can be prone to delays and defects found during trials, in the case of QE hers are horribly insignificant in the grand scheme

R686
Senior Member
Posts: 2324
Joined: 28 May 2015, 02:43
Australia

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by R686 »

SKB wrote:
:geek: And don't forget PoW is 3000 tonnes heavier than QE.
I hear this a lot, but no one can give a definitive answer on how she differs from the original

Jake1992
Senior Member
Posts: 2006
Joined: 28 Aug 2016, 22:35
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Jake1992 »

R686 wrote:
SKB wrote:
:geek: And don't forget PoW is 3000 tonnes heavier than QE.
I hear this a lot, but no one can give a definitive answer on how she differs from the original
If true when QE goes in for her amphibious mods is it expected she'll gain that much weight ?

User avatar
Gabriele
Senior Member
Posts: 1998
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:53
Contact:
Italy

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Gabriele »

Prince of Wales is 3,000 tonnes heavier than her sister was at the same stage - as the second ship in the class, construction and fitting out has moved more swiftly thanks to the lessons learned building HMS Queen Elizabeth.

Originally planned for 2018, the 'undocking' of the carrier took place ahead of schedule and just three months after the carrier was officially named by HRH the Duchess of Rothesay, as the Duchess of Cornwall is titled in Scotland.

The next milestone in the ship's life will be the first running up of the generators and gas turbines, bringing the ship to life, which are earmarked for middle of 2018, followed by sea trials in 2019.
https://www.royalnavy.mod.uk/news-and-l ... first-time

Don't think the 3000 tons have anything to do with amphibious mods. At least, the most of them don't.
You might also know me as Liger30, from that great forum than MP.net was.

Arma Pacis Fulcra.
Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum

inch
Senior Member
Posts: 1313
Joined: 27 May 2015, 21:35

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by inch »

your right Gabriele the 2 ships are going to be the same weight in the end up, its just if they were 2 teams having a race pow team has managed to put more of the same stuff that's going on both ships that weighs 3000t on pow than the qe team has at this stage .that's what I understand it saying

R686
Senior Member
Posts: 2324
Joined: 28 May 2015, 02:43
Australia

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by R686 »

Gabriele wrote:
Don't think the 3000 tons have anything to do with amphibious mods. At least, the most of them don't.
Yeah from my understanding its simple mods like wider passageways and doorways, unless they have made changes to the troop accommodation and explosive handling magazines. Would be interesting to see what has actually changed :thumbup:

cpu121
Member
Posts: 29
Joined: 10 May 2015, 02:09

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by cpu121 »

abc123 wrote:
SKB wrote: QE Total time: 2 years, 10 months, 19 days (1054 days)


PoW Total time: 3 years, 3 months, 13 days (1200 days)
Why was PoW longer in the dock?
Presumably because they could. Leave her in there and have full access in the drydock for longer vs rushing out QE to make way for PoW and working on QE from quayside.

Repulse
Donator
Posts: 4698
Joined: 05 May 2015, 22:46
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Repulse »

Could we see POW on trials earlier than 2019? There seems to be a rush now to get HMS Ocean sold off.
”We have no eternal allies, and we have no perpetual enemies. Our interests are eternal and perpetual, and those interests it is our duty to follow." - Lord Palmerston

mercury
Junior Member
Posts: 1
Joined: 23 Dec 2017, 10:36
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by mercury »

She was longer in dock as their was no reason to float her out to start work on a sister ship.

User avatar
SKB
Senior Member
Posts: 7943
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:35
England

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by SKB »

I suppose they can start disassembling the Goliath crane now. Its jobs done.

R686
Senior Member
Posts: 2324
Joined: 28 May 2015, 02:43
Australia

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by R686 »

SKB wrote:I suppose they can start disassembling the Goliath crane now. Its jobs done.

did they get a buyer in the end?

User avatar
SKB
Senior Member
Posts: 7943
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:35
England

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by SKB »

None that I know of.

RetroSicotte
Retired Site Admin
Posts: 2657
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:10
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by RetroSicotte »

I don't think PoW is actually 3,000 tonnes heavier.

They just mean its advanced faster and has been more fully constructed by this point in its development.

Pongoglo
Member
Posts: 231
Joined: 14 Jun 2015, 10:39
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Pongoglo »

2HeadsBetter wrote:Pesky facts getting in the way of a good story:

https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/contrac ... tion-work/

"A typical bilge pump even on a narrow boat, by the way, can handle over 1000 litres per hour."


Absolutely and Ive been making this point down the pub nearly every night since the story 'leaked' - excuse the pun. My Rule bilge pump on my 30 ft Colvic Sailer is rated at 650 GPH, thats 650 gallons per hour so 200 litres on a 65,000 ton aircraft carrier is absolutely nothing at all. Fake news or wot?

Dahedd
Member
Posts: 660
Joined: 06 May 2015, 11:18

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Dahedd »

SKB wrote:I suppose they can start disassembling the Goliath crane now. Its jobs done.
I'd like to think they'd keep it in expectation of using it for the next MARS ships or a future pair of LPH/LHD. Can dream I guess.

R686
Senior Member
Posts: 2324
Joined: 28 May 2015, 02:43
Australia

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by R686 »

Dahedd wrote:
SKB wrote:I suppose they can start disassembling the Goliath crane now. Its jobs done.
I'd like to think they'd keep it in expectation of using it for the next MARS ships or a future pair of LPH/LHD. Can dream I guess.
Wonder what the year maintenance cost of the crane would be as it would be another 10 years before a replacement for the LPD's would start unless the gap it too .

I belive the original OSD for Albion is 2033 and Bulwark 2034 from memory, that's potentially 5-6 ships including the Bays from 2027

R686
Senior Member
Posts: 2324
Joined: 28 May 2015, 02:43
Australia

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by R686 »

https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/hms-que ... t-mission/


HMS Queen Elizabeth to urgently sail to Arctic Circle in coming days to support air transport mission


The first 9 STOVL aircraft and 1 COD operation, thank god its got a ramp.


It would need a good wash down after the fact and watch were you step 8-) :roll: :lol:

abc123
Senior Member
Posts: 2903
Joined: 10 May 2015, 18:15
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by abc123 »

R686 wrote: I belive the original OSD for Albion is 2033 and Bulwark 2034 from memory, that's potentially 5-6 ships including the Bays from 2027
How about 2018? :eh:
Fortune favors brave sir, said Carrot cheerfully.
What's her position about heavily armed, well prepared and overmanned armies?
Oh, noone's ever heard of Fortune favoring them, sir.
According to General Tacticus, it's because they favor themselves…

User avatar
SKB
Senior Member
Posts: 7943
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:35
England

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by SKB »

Image
(HMSPWLS)
:clap:

SDL
Member
Posts: 763
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 20:52
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by SDL »

:clap: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

R686
Senior Member
Posts: 2324
Joined: 28 May 2015, 02:43
Australia

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by R686 »

abc123 wrote:
R686 wrote: I belive the original OSD for Albion is 2033 and Bulwark 2034 from memory, that's potentially 5-6 ships including the Bays from 2027
How about 2018? :eh:

Well it wont be long before you find out :evil:

its hard to imagine not so long ago you guys had, HM Ships Invincible, Illustrious, Ark Royal, Ocean, Albion & Bulwark

User avatar
SKB
Senior Member
Posts: 7943
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:35
England

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by SKB »


Image

Post Reply