Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Contains threads on Royal Navy equipment of the past, present and future.
Enigmatically
Member
Posts: 345
Joined: 04 May 2015, 19:00

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Enigmatically »

Jerry Kyd?

I think he really, really doesn't want to be late!

CameronPerson
Member
Posts: 300
Joined: 09 Apr 2017, 17:03
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by CameronPerson »



Video of the crew getting in practice for procedure alpha ahead of the big day in around seven hours :D

CameronPerson
Member
Posts: 300
Joined: 09 Apr 2017, 17:03
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by CameronPerson »




I don't think we've seen in the hangar properly since she's been at sea, but looking at it I think its definitely clear to see it's a huge step up from the somewhat cramped confines of the Invincibles..


User avatar
SKB
Senior Member
Posts: 7949
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:35
England

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by SKB »



This was the first ever video posted in the original version of this thread on mp.net

No, I can't sleep either! 3 hours to go! :lol:

Caribbean
Senior Member
Posts: 2822
Joined: 09 Jan 2016, 19:08
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Caribbean »

Well - hope the weather is good and that you all get a good view. It's a bit of a long swim for me to get there, so looking for lots of good piccies.

Not in the slightest bit jealous .......
No...... really :mrgreen:
The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty.
Winston Churchill

Ron5
Donator
Posts: 7317
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:42
United States of America

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Ron5 »

Darn! Hoping they'd have an F-35 or two hidden below.

WhiteWhale
Member
Posts: 273
Joined: 19 Oct 2015, 18:29
Somalia

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by WhiteWhale »

Ron5 wrote:Darn! Hoping they'd have an F-35 or two hidden below.

I would expect that a mock up or two will make an appearance shortly to practice handling and stowage procedures on.


There is a live stream for any interested :

bobp
Senior Member
Posts: 2703
Joined: 06 May 2015, 07:52
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by bobp »

A little misty from my vantage point but must be a hundred small craft out there with the QE. Reminds me when the RN came back from Falklands war. What an awesome sight she is.

WhiteWhale
Member
Posts: 273
Joined: 19 Oct 2015, 18:29
Somalia

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by WhiteWhale »

Sorry/notsorry. Repost for a new page.


User avatar
Zealot
Member
Posts: 98
Joined: 20 Feb 2017, 16:39
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Zealot »

Bloody thing keeps freezing.

RAF>FAN
Member
Posts: 45
Joined: 01 May 2015, 08:30

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by RAF>FAN »

Same for me

CameronPerson
Member
Posts: 300
Joined: 09 Apr 2017, 17:03
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by CameronPerson »

BBC had to pick the worst view of the flypast half way through the thing! :shock:

CameronPerson
Member
Posts: 300
Joined: 09 Apr 2017, 17:03
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by CameronPerson »

How many times have I hard that bloody line now, "no aircraft" -_- I don't understand what people expect, do we immediately start operating after first flights perhaps or as soon as the ship leaves the builders yard?

The lack of common sense on this matter or the fact that some media just write to talk outrage is infuriating. Perhaps just convey what a significant day this is without adding all the faux outrage over a matter they over simplify.

User avatar
Zealot
Member
Posts: 98
Joined: 20 Feb 2017, 16:39
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Zealot »

Someone has been reading the Toxic Youtube chat ;)

CameronPerson
Member
Posts: 300
Joined: 09 Apr 2017, 17:03
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by CameronPerson »

Zealot wrote:Someone has been reading the Toxic Youtube chat ;)
Sadly it's been from watching the news too :!:

LordJim
Member
Posts: 454
Joined: 28 Apr 2016, 00:39
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by LordJim »

If we still had the Harriers at least we could be conducting additional trials for STOVL operations. But we don't, but we should have at least a quantity of F-35s already operating in the UK by now. The slow pace of ordering and deliveries of out F-35s seems to be at odds with other nations. Our attitude of waiting for all the bugs to be irons out before actually bring the F-35s across the Atlantic may look good to the risk management types. Maybe we invite the USMC over to do our F-35 trials instead.

I know things take time but the whole CVF programme has been kneecapped by the Treasury time and time again, delaying the various parts of the programme so that regardless of the spin coming out of the MoD and Government, they are all out of step and won't come together for almost another decade, which is incompetent to say the least. In the mean time we try to fill to flight deck with Merlins to at least make it seem to be an Aircraft Carrier, though officially it isn't. Rather it is an sovereign aviation basing assets we can move around the worlds seas, looking very nice but lacking the on board assets to actually be a carrier. I cannot see the USN or French navy sending one of their carriers to sea with only one fast jet squadron and a similar number of rotary assets!

The ship does look good I admit, but it has he lowest level of self protection of any carrier afloat, at a level equal to the RFA so maybe they should be the ones operating it as it isn't a true combat vessel in its current form. To become this it need to operate at least 24 F-35s at all times together with 8 Merlin HM2s and 4 Merlin/CROWSNEST. It needs a far greater self defence capability beyond a couple of Phalanx and autocannon, with a number of Sea Ceptor canisters, say 16, at a minimum. Putting the T-45 in service with only its Sea Viper and 4.5" was embarrassing, but if the Carriers enter service as is, only carrying Merlin HM2, every navy in he world will be laughing behind our backs if not to our face.

It really sums up out whole messed up defence organisation with this programme. Constant delays, insufficient numbers procured, capabilities reduced and so on. And remember the RN cripples itself by deleting over half its escort fleet and many other assets to just get here. Ok rant over.

CameronPerson
Member
Posts: 300
Joined: 09 Apr 2017, 17:03
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by CameronPerson »



Picture by Chris Terrill currently on board filming a documentary. The last time Jerry Kyd stood on the bridge as captain of an aircraft carrier being guided into Portsmouth was in November 2010 when HMS Ark Royal entered after her farewell tour

andrew98
Member
Posts: 197
Joined: 05 May 2015, 22:28
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by andrew98 »

http://news.sky.com/story/hms-queen-eli ... g-10990510

Pretty impressed with sky news article, not jumped on the outrage bus and actually explains it a bit why no jets....
Seems so unlike most news articles.!

CameronPerson
Member
Posts: 300
Joined: 09 Apr 2017, 17:03
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by CameronPerson »

LordJim wrote:If we still had the Harriers at least we could be conducting additional trials for STOVL operations.
Although it was humiliating to retire the Harrier and create a capability gap in fixed wing naval aviation for almost a decade, in the context of the financial situation the MoD found itself in I think it was sadly the right thing to do. JFH had been run ragged by commitments in Afghanistan (sadly carrier flying severely suffered because of this) and Tornado proved to be more useful because of the range of weapons cleared for it and the number of the fleet. Harrier withdrawal was not the result of sound military advice, it was caused by political and economic considersatjons and these are never popular. However I think you're quite right that it shows the huge mismanagement that had occurred in the MoD and more worryingly, seems to happen to this day. The Treasury has been given far too much involvement with MoD matters and the defence budget has suffered. Although it's not as "political glamorous" as Education or the NHS, defence is as important if not more, without it you'd find yourself in the position where the NHS may not even matter anymore.

I also think the decision not to arm the QE class with Sea Ceptor is odd to say the least. It seems to go back to that post-Falklands thinking that Sea Dart hadn't really done much for Invincible so removal could free up space. Well now we've got a carrier where there is space and escort numbers aren't even half of what Invincible had in the South Atlantic and I'd say that since we haven't heard much in regards to the "Type 31E" I can only assume that escort numbers will continue to fall for a while as the Type 23s are withdrawn. Surely this would create the need for Sea Ceptor to give the carrier longer range coverage than its CIWS allows.

On the upside I'm just glad that atm we're actually getting two carriers rather than one!

matt00773
Member
Posts: 301
Joined: 01 Jun 2016, 14:31
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by matt00773 »

LordJim wrote:If we still had the Harriers at least we could be conducting additional trials for STOVL operations. But we don't, but we should have at least a quantity of F-35s already operating in the UK by now. The slow pace of ordering and deliveries of out F-35s seems to be at odds with other nations. Our attitude of waiting for all the bugs to be irons out before actually bring the F-35s across the Atlantic may look good to the risk management types. Maybe we invite the USMC over to do our F-35 trials instead.

I know things take time but the whole CVF programme has been kneecapped by the Treasury time and time again, delaying the various parts of the programme so that regardless of the spin coming out of the MoD and Government, they are all out of step and won't come together for almost another decade, which is incompetent to say the least. In the mean time we try to fill to flight deck with Merlins to at least make it seem to be an Aircraft Carrier, though officially it isn't. Rather it is an sovereign aviation basing assets we can move around the worlds seas, looking very nice but lacking the on board assets to actually be a carrier. I cannot see the USN or French navy sending one of their carriers to sea with only one fast jet squadron and a similar number of rotary assets!

The ship does look good I admit, but it has he lowest level of self protection of any carrier afloat, at a level equal to the RFA so maybe they should be the ones operating it as it isn't a true combat vessel in its current form. To become this it need to operate at least 24 F-35s at all times together with 8 Merlin HM2s and 4 Merlin/CROWSNEST. It needs a far greater self defence capability beyond a couple of Phalanx and autocannon, with a number of Sea Ceptor canisters, say 16, at a minimum. Putting the T-45 in service with only its Sea Viper and 4.5" was embarrassing, but if the Carriers enter service as is, only carrying Merlin HM2, every navy in he world will be laughing behind our backs if not to our face.

It really sums up out whole messed up defence organisation with this programme. Constant delays, insufficient numbers procured, capabilities reduced and so on. And remember the RN cripples itself by deleting over half its escort fleet and many other assets to just get here. Ok rant over.
STOVL trials are already being conducted by UK F-35s - see video below. F-35s will be operational next year and there will be over 40 by the early 20s when QE ramps up operational capability. Nearly everything you've written in your statement is actually the opposite of what is the case.


Wrekin1410
Member
Posts: 83
Joined: 29 Jul 2015, 07:28

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Wrekin1410 »

A couple of pictures from my phone taken from the beach between Square and Round towers.

Up close, and especially looking up at her as she passed the beach, she's incredibly impressive. I really like all the angles and how, due to the number and shape of the islands she looks almost a completely different ship when seen from each angle.

Glad I took the time and was able to come down to see her arrive. I've said it before but all involved should be incredibly proud.
IMG_3330.JPG
IMG_3322.JPG
IMG_3311.JPG
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

dmereifield
Senior Member
Posts: 2762
Joined: 03 Aug 2016, 20:29
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by dmereifield »

Wrekin1410 wrote:A couple of pictures from my phone taken from the beach between Square and Round towers.

Up close, and especially looking up at her as she passed the beach, she's incredibly impressive. I really like all the angles and how, due to the number and shape of the islands she looks almost a completely different ship when seen from each angle.

Glad I took the time and was able to come down to see her arrive. I've said it before but all involved should be incredibly proud.
IMG_3330.JPG
IMG_3322.JPG
IMG_3311.JPG
Yea agreed, she, and the event itself this morning, was spectacular. Just a shame we didn't get a few more airframes in the fly past....and I would have loved to see a few F35s on deck too....

User avatar
ArmChairCivvy
Senior Member
Posts: 16312
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by ArmChairCivvy »

Great shot, the middle one! The pros will be envious...
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)

PhillyJ
Member
Posts: 745
Joined: 01 May 2015, 09:27
England

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by PhillyJ »

Not great pics, but taken with my phone as I was looking after 3 kids so not able to take anything grander! The biggest bug bear was whoever was on the PA system, if he had said 'THE' HMS Queen Elizabeth once more I was going to track him down and shove his mic where the sun don't shine. :lol:
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

PhillyJ
Member
Posts: 745
Joined: 01 May 2015, 09:27
England

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by PhillyJ »

ok, why are some of my pics upside down? They seem fine on my lappy. :roll:

Post Reply