Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Contains threads on Royal Navy equipment of the past, present and future.
User avatar
SKB
Senior Member
Posts: 7949
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:35
England

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by SKB »

Ugh. PoW has a ships crest sticker on the front of the ramp. Just seen it on the BBC News... :roll:

Bring Deeps
Donator
Posts: 220
Joined: 27 May 2015, 21:06
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Bring Deeps »

It will be interesting to see what appears on the LM F35 website about UK orders over the next few days.

Although that website isn't going to be 100% reliable at least LM as a US commercial organisation are probably subject to tougher controls than UK politician on giving out facts, or if there are no facts to give out, keeping quiet.

RAF>FAN
Member
Posts: 45
Joined: 01 May 2015, 08:30

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by RAF>FAN »

So only 8 Type 26 then?

Wonder how many smaller Frigates?

OevetS
Member
Posts: 15
Joined: 01 Jun 2015, 07:50

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by OevetS »

So he said, so it is confirmed!!...... so what the hell are these smaller cheaper frigates, black swans???

arfah
Senior Member
Posts: 2173
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 19:02
Niue

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by arfah »

............
Admin Note: This user is banned after turning most of their old posts into spam. This is why you may see their posts containing nothing more than dots or symbols. We have decided to keep these posts in place as it shows where they once were and why other users may be replying to things no longer visible in the topic. We apologise for any inconvenience.

RAF>FAN
Member
Posts: 45
Joined: 01 May 2015, 08:30

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by RAF>FAN »

Maybe an improved/upgraded River Class?

OevetS
Member
Posts: 15
Joined: 01 Jun 2015, 07:50

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by OevetS »

RAF>FAN wrote:Maybe an improved/upgraded River Class?
oh dear, short changed anyone??

Oh he said 13 frigates, to include 8 type 26's and must be 5 new designed light flexible frigates, plus he said OPV's????

User avatar
GibMariner
Senior Member
Posts: 1351
Joined: 12 May 2015, 14:17

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by GibMariner »

• Royal Marines of 3 Commando Brigade who are trained and equipped to provide
specialist amphibious and Arctic warfare capabilities. We will enhance a Queen
Elizabeth Class aircraft carrier to support this amphibious capability
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/s ... b_only.pdf

Page 31

User avatar
shark bait
Senior Member
Posts: 6427
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:18
Pitcairn Island

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by shark bait »

GibMariner wrote:
• Royal Marines of 3 Commando Brigade who are trained and equipped to provide
specialist amphibious and Arctic warfare capabilities. We will enhance a Queen
Elizabeth Class aircraft carrier to support this amphibious capability
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/s ... b_only.pdf

Page 31
More beds on POW?
@LandSharkUK

User avatar
CR4ZYHOR5E
Member
Posts: 76
Joined: 02 May 2015, 10:57
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by CR4ZYHOR5E »

Response to a question from the DUP...

'Both carriers will be brought into service, both carriers will be crewed.'

SDL
Member
Posts: 763
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 20:52
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by SDL »

I would guess that would be the PoW that'll be 'enhanced'. What enhancements would this mean?

OevetS
Member
Posts: 15
Joined: 01 Jun 2015, 07:50

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by OevetS »

. sorry wrong thread

arfah
Senior Member
Posts: 2173
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 19:02
Niue

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by arfah »

................
Admin Note: This user is banned after turning most of their old posts into spam. This is why you may see their posts containing nothing more than dots or symbols. We have decided to keep these posts in place as it shows where they once were and why other users may be replying to things no longer visible in the topic. We apologise for any inconvenience.

Fire_In_My_Hole
Junior Member
Posts: 9
Joined: 29 May 2015, 12:54
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Fire_In_My_Hole »

"with one available at all times"
The Royal Navy
4.47
The Royal Navy delivers our nuclear deterrent, projects our maritime power and
provides world-class amphibious forces. As part of Joint Force 2025, we will have:

Two new Queen Elizabeth
Class aircraft carriers, the largest warships ever built for
the Royal Navy. These will enter service from 2018, transforming the Royal Navy’s
ability to project our influence overseas. They will form the core of our maritime task
group, with one available at all times. We will increase the number of F35 Lightning
aircraft we are buying in the early 2020s to ensure that we make best use of this
world-leading capability, and we will buy three new logistic ships to support the fleet,
in addition to the four tankers that will enter service from 2016.

User avatar
SKB
Senior Member
Posts: 7949
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:35
England

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by SKB »

Did the SDSR imply both carriers could deploy together with 2 seperate crews and aircraft squadrons? Or "one in, one out" strategy ?

arfah
Senior Member
Posts: 2173
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 19:02
Niue

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by arfah »

One in, one out would involve two seperate crews.

Otherwise, how would they take their leave entitlement?
Admin Note: This user is banned after turning most of their old posts into spam. This is why you may see their posts containing nothing more than dots or symbols. We have decided to keep these posts in place as it shows where they once were and why other users may be replying to things no longer visible in the topic. We apologise for any inconvenience.

User avatar
Old RN
Member
Posts: 226
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 19:39
South Africa

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Old RN »

If one of the QEs is enharnced for amphibious function it would imply that both are normally deployable as part of a surge, otherwise they would enharnce both of them?

User avatar
The Armchair Soldier
Site Admin
Posts: 1755
Joined: 29 Apr 2015, 08:31
Contact:
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by The Armchair Soldier »

I'm guessing the enhancement of POW for amphibious ops is to alleviate (to some degree) the loss of Ocean?

User avatar
QEC Eye in the SKY
Member
Posts: 277
Joined: 27 May 2015, 12:51
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by QEC Eye in the SKY »

Not exactly Christmas morning with the SDSR 2015, but its hardly the worst one in recent times. Some ambiguity with regards whether QE & PoW will be operated side by side or the 'one in one out' method, and seeing has he mentioned RN numbers to increase by just 700, hardly enough to crew a QE Class carrier and the support required. Anyway, onwards and upwards and all that!!!


Shame that only 8 type 26's will be ordered, but at least we're getting the P8 at long last!

User avatar
SKB
Senior Member
Posts: 7949
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:35
England

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by SKB »

Any news of Goliath lifting/fitting PoW blocks?

User avatar
The Armchair Soldier
Site Admin
Posts: 1755
Joined: 29 Apr 2015, 08:31
Contact:
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by The Armchair Soldier »

Managing Director’s Blog – November Update
Following the Prime Minister’s announcement regarding the outcome of the Strategic Defence and Security Review yesterday, everyone in the Alliance should be pleased that the UK government has underlined the importance of our two-ship programme to the country’s future defence requirements, ensuring that one carrier is available at all times.

The SDSR reaffirms how strategically important HMS Queen Elizabeth and HMS Prince of Wales are to the defence of the country. The government is increasing the procurement of F-35 Lightning II aircraft for the UK in the early 2020s and has confirmed that it will enhance one of the QE Class carriers to support the amphibious capabilities of the Royal Marines 3 Commando Brigade.
It is up to all of us within the Alliance and the supply chain to ensure we continue to make every day count and deliver the programme to schedule and target cost. The Royal Navy and the nation expect F35 Lightning IIs to be flying from HMS Queen Elizabeth in 2018 and with initial operating capability by 2020. This will only happen if we deliver.

And we’re certainly making good progress. We have both gas turbines and diesel generators now up and running on HMS Queen Elizabeth, much of the mission system in commissioning and we hope to be turning the first of her two propulsion shafts by the end of the year. HMS Prince of Wales is also still on schedule and looking like a proper ship in the dry dock. I have no doubt, 2016 will be a challenging year for everyone, but we all know what we have to do to deliver. I’m confident we have the team in place to achieve it.
http://www.aircraftcarrieralliance.co.u ... -blog.aspx

User avatar
SKB
Senior Member
Posts: 7949
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:35
England

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by SKB »

I think they should enhance both ships. What if the one enhanced carrier is dry-docked for six months for a lengthy refit but is urgently needed?

Ron5
Donator
Posts: 7323
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:42
United States of America

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Ron5 »

SKB wrote:I think they should enhance both ships. What if the one enhanced carrier is dry-docked for six months for a lengthy refit but is urgently needed?
Bu they'd have to buy new davits & hammocks to do that! (as opposed to reusing Ocean's) :-)

seaspear
Senior Member
Posts: 1779
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 20:16
Australia

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by seaspear »

The Prince of Wales was much earlier claimed to have different modificatons to the Queen Elizabeth is anything known in detail about the modifications and how differently the two ships capabilities will be from each other

User avatar
Gabriele
Senior Member
Posts: 1998
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:53
Contact:
Italy

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Gabriele »

SKB wrote:I think they should enhance both ships. What if the one enhanced carrier is dry-docked for six months for a lengthy refit but is urgently needed?
Probably it'll be so, but it will only happen at each carrier's first major refit. Maybe they can accommodate some changes at build on PoW, but they will not want to introduce much more and risk to miss target dates and have the NAO denounce another cost increase...
You might also know me as Liger30, from that great forum than MP.net was.

Arma Pacis Fulcra.
Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum

Post Reply