Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Contains threads on Royal Navy equipment of the past, present and future.
Roders96
Member
Posts: 225
Joined: 26 Aug 2019, 14:41
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Roders96 »

Ron5 wrote:It was that f**wit Osborne that savagely cut the UK military with no thought to consequences in support of his daft financial ideas. And lied about it to both parliament and the electorate. And did so with the full blessing and backing of the other f**wit Cameron.

No doubt in the fullness of time their contributions will be recognized with a Lordship like that other serial liar Hammond.

Unfortunately their ideas are still strong in Boris's circle.

Oh man this is sooo off topic, I'll be crucified :(
Jake1992 wrote:
serge750 wrote:
inch wrote:Just to throw a spanner in the mix ,if only ever going to be smaller numbers onboard in reality should they have built so big ,yes I know by the argument about was designed to facilitate and generate so many sorties etc and the saving scale of bigger etc but in reality if only ever going to Carry so much less than was Designed for 99% of her life why bother ? And yes it's early days and going to take time to build up aircraft numbers etc etc ,but will still only deploy 99% time with less after that .yes I know we got them now so mute point I quess now ,and great looking they are too
When they were designed it seemed like the RN was in a good place anticipating they would get the airwing needed, but the 2010 sdsr messed everything up badly, how many T23 & T22 were cut... :thumbdown:

Interesting idea as having a QEC as a north atlantic carrier with a multi national airwing, would all the other nations be willing to have such small fleets ( maybe 12 each ) of the B version? would be good for co-operation though, 4 assigned from each nation along with 4 from the uk ? just like with the usmc :thumbup:
The expected path for the RN when the QEs were designed was that they’d end up with 12 T45s ( replacing the T42 one for one ) and 20 T26 ( replacing the then 16 T23s and 4 T22s like for like ) then Blair started the cuts selling 3 T23s and the crash follow SRD 2010 cut the T22s.

I can’t see nations that are not already planning F35B purchases getting any at all but we could see Italy and Spain putting a few towards an air group now and then.
Wrote my dissertation on escort production, not sure the 2+12+20(20!?) was ever more than a pipedream.

The main factors behind escorts falling by half 2000 through 2020 was:

1 - Reorganising of all UK warship production under a profit maximising monopoly.

2 - Tony Blair's bloody escapades.

3 - Terrible contracting (govt side).

4 - Not a 7% fall in MoD equipment spend. The output is entirely disproportionate.

Good news is T31 has thoroughly reversed the most significant factor whilst protecting Scottish shipbuilding and the Union. Well thought out all round.

User avatar
ArmChairCivvy
Senior Member
Posts: 16312
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by ArmChairCivvy »

Roders96 wrote:Good news is T31 has thoroughly reversed the most significant factor whilst protecting Scottish shipbuilding and the Union. Well thought out all round.
:thumbup:

£6+ bn for the carriers and more for the airwings (a strategy change) was not on your list. The subsequent shift in manning demands ever-more automated ships and/or lightly manned 'presence' ships, within an overall lesser number of units
- continuing from the :thumbup: -piece; bearing all of this in mind, it was inevitable that the A140 design was to be chosen (for its upgradeability; what again was the initial design from which the consortium switched away? I am sure, under some gentle guidance from the RN)
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)

Roders96
Member
Posts: 225
Joined: 26 Aug 2019, 14:41
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Roders96 »

True, however:

- We've also seen a consolidation in other large ships to compensate (amphibious and support), important when the expensive bits are the internal / intermediate systems, and not steel as you suggest

- there has also been an even sharper contraction in RAF fast air squadrons, roughly 55%, which has also seen a similar consolidation into monopoly

Did review these and thought on balance not the most significant, surprisingly. It was a comprehensive piece that got a 1st! Not to blow my own trumpet..

User avatar
The Armchair Soldier
Site Admin
Posts: 1749
Joined: 29 Apr 2015, 08:31
Contact:
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by The Armchair Soldier »

The GROUPEX for Exercise Joint Warrior has been confirmed: HMS Queen Elizabeth, HMS Kent, HMS Diamond, HMS Northumberland, RFA Tideforce, RFA Fort Victoria, HNLMS Evertsen, USS The Sullivans and I'm guessing "HMS :shh:" in QE's Tweet refers to a RN sub too. Should be a sight to behold.

User avatar
Tempest414
Senior Member
Posts: 5601
Joined: 04 Jan 2018, 23:39
France

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Tempest414 »

As said a few days ago HMS Albion is out and about anyone know where the Bays are at this time

ThunderPants
Member
Posts: 20
Joined: 01 Jan 2016, 20:12

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by ThunderPants »

The Armchair Soldier wrote:The GROUPEX for Exercise Joint Warrior has been confirmed: HMS Queen Elizabeth, HMS Kent, HMS Diamond, HMS Northumberland, RFA Tideforce, RFA Fort Victoria, HNLMS Evertsen, USS The Sullivans and I'm guessing "HMS :shh:" in QE's Tweet refers to a RN sub too. Should be a sight to behold.

You seem to have forgotten HMS Defender, well at least according to this feed

inch
Senior Member
Posts: 1313
Joined: 27 May 2015, 21:35

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by inch »

Do we know yet what the mystery suprise / announcement is yet folks?

User avatar
ArmChairCivvy
Senior Member
Posts: 16312
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by ArmChairCivvy »

Roders96 wrote:We've also seen a consolidation in other large ships to compensate (amphibious and support), important when the expensive bits are the internal / intermediate systems, and not steel as you suggest
I was actually suggesting the manning (a new balance, within pretty much given constraints for it) and you have seen that the manning-heavy platforms - regardless of their irreplaceable function - have been hit the heaviest and the logs end -lean manning as they akin to commercial shipping - less so.
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)

Jdam
Member
Posts: 933
Joined: 09 May 2015, 22:26
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Jdam »

ThunderPants wrote:
Quite the show of force before the defence review.

Roders96
Member
Posts: 225
Joined: 26 Aug 2019, 14:41
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Roders96 »

Jdam wrote:
ThunderPants wrote:
Quite the show of force before the defence review.
Will be potent to demonstrate what can be achieved with a squadron of jets on the deck.

User avatar
Tempest414
Senior Member
Posts: 5601
Joined: 04 Jan 2018, 23:39
France

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Tempest414 »

With HMS Albion and HMS POW being out and about at the same time it would be great to get a picture of the two carriers maybe POW Could carry 6 to 8 Chinooks and Apache on her deck we can all dream

PhillyJ
Member
Posts: 745
Joined: 01 May 2015, 09:27
England

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by PhillyJ »

Tempest414 wrote:With HMS Albion and HMS POW being out and about at the same time it would be great to get a picture of the two carriers maybe POW Could carry 6 to 8 Chinooks and Apache on her deck we can all dream
Indeed, I believe she is going out to trial/qualify other Helicopters.

PhillyJ
Member
Posts: 745
Joined: 01 May 2015, 09:27
England

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by PhillyJ »

Ron5 wrote:
PhillyJ wrote:
SKB wrote:Third time lucky?
QE still listed for 16:35 departure on QHM website.... :shh:
I'd say it's pretty much assured, Nipper said that PWLS was due to switch once she'd departed and sure enough, on the QHM for tomorrow, PWLS is moving 0930 to Victory Jetty Bows N in preparation for their trip away this month.
Why does PWLS need to change berths?
Apologies for not replying sooner, it was to enable QNLZ to return and use PRJ for the loading/unloading of 'stuff' for GroupEx I guess, or as my nipper put it...just to p*ss us on board off! They stored PWLS before moving, he has not carried so many Frozen Chickens or Uncle Ben's sauce he also commented on. :lol:

inch
Senior Member
Posts: 1313
Joined: 27 May 2015, 21:35

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by inch »

I know what you mean about a show of force before the defence review would look great for the photos :thumbup: but also the cynic in me thinks the political bods Makin the decisions would look at that and think ,hey we've got loads of ships we can cut a few ,lol .

Jdam
Member
Posts: 933
Joined: 09 May 2015, 22:26
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Jdam »

inch wrote:I know what you mean about a show of force before the defence review would look great for the photos :thumbup: but also the cynic in me thinks the political bods Makin the decisions would look at that and think ,hey we've got loads of ships we can cut a few ,lol .
I would be lying if I said that thought didn't cross my mind.

User avatar
SKB
Senior Member
Posts: 7943
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:35
England

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by SKB »

Image
(@pinstripedline SirHumphrey) 15th September 2020
This image is a helpful visual guide to the planned force that HMS QUEEN ELIZABETH will lead on the forthcoming Exercise JOINT WARRIOR.

It shows how the Carrier Strike Group concept is really coming together nicely.
HMS Queen Elizabeth (R08)
HMS Diamond (D34)
HMS Defender (D36)
HMS Northumberland (F238)
HMS Kent (F78)
An unknown Royal Navy submarine
RFA Tideforce (A139)
RFA Fort Victoria (A387)
USS The Sullivans (DDG 68) - United States
HNLMS Evertsen (F805) - Netherlands

inch
Senior Member
Posts: 1313
Joined: 27 May 2015, 21:35

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by inch »

Yes the political bods will look at that and even count the foreign ships as ours the bumbling inaccurate fools to Think we gots loads ,why do we need more ships and cash lol,but yes it going to look good ,Def a screen saver :thumbup:

User avatar
Jensy
Senior Member
Posts: 1078
Joined: 05 Aug 2016, 19:44
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Jensy »

By tonnage, rather than numbers, this has got to be one of the largest RN deployments in a very long time.
USS The Sullivans (DDG 68)
Thought, even by US Navy standards, that was an odd name so looked up the history of it:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sullivan_brothers

Equal parts fascinating, heartbreaking and mind boggling by modern standards.

Apologies for straying off topic.

User avatar
SKB
Senior Member
Posts: 7943
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:35
England

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by SKB »

SKB wrote:USS The Sullivans (DDG 68)
The Sullivans is an Australian period drama television series produced by Crawford Productions which ran on the Nine Network from 15 November 1976 until 10 March 1983. The series tells the story of a fictitional average middle-class Melbourne family and the effect that the Second World War and the immediate post-war events had on their lives. It covers the period between 1 September 1939 to 22 August 1948. It was a consistent ratings success in Australia, and also became popular in the United Kingdom, Ireland, the Netherlands, Gibraltar, Greece and New Zealand.

In the United Kingdom, The Sullivans was first shown on the ITV network from 18 October 1977 and was repeated on various other British channels up until 1998.
:mrgreen:

Caribbean
Senior Member
Posts: 2818
Joined: 09 Jan 2016, 19:08
United Kingdom

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by Caribbean »

Jensy wrote:Thought, even by US Navy standards, that was an odd name so looked up the history of it:
They made a movie about them, called "The Fighting Sullivans", IIRC. Their case (amongst others) lead to the US military adopting the Sole Survivor Policy which, in turn, resulted in the Niland brothers case (where three out of four brothers were thought to have died, with the fourth being sent home, after surviving Omaha Beach), which was itself the basis of Saving Private Ryan (though in the their case, another of the brothers was MIA, believed dead, and did actually survive the war in a Japanese POW camp).

Sorry - drifting further OT
The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty.
Winston Churchill

PhillyJ
Member
Posts: 745
Joined: 01 May 2015, 09:27
England

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by PhillyJ »

Back on Topic you naughty lot...QNLZ off out again tomorrow but hanging around the Solent for a bit just to disrupt the shipping lanes I guess...


User avatar
SKB
Senior Member
Posts: 7943
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:35
England

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by SKB »

Image

QE will anchor at the Nab Tower, not Stokes Bay.
And btw, the Nab Tower isn't in the Solent, its off the east coast of the Isle Of Wight.
https://www.royalnavy.mod.uk/qhm/portsm ... 16/09/2020

PhillyJ
Member
Posts: 745
Joined: 01 May 2015, 09:27
England

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by PhillyJ »

SKB wrote:Image

QE will anchor at the Nab Tower, not Stokes Bay.
https://www.royalnavy.mod.uk/qhm/portsm ... 16/09/2020
Indeed, it's quite surprising how many people think that 'The Solent' just means Stokes Bay, for those of us who have lived all our lives here and gone out on 'boats' to clamber aboard USS JFK in the late 70's we know better, you really do not want to see those pics...although it has got F8's and F14's in them!

PhillyJ
Member
Posts: 745
Joined: 01 May 2015, 09:27
England

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by PhillyJ »

The QNLZ move looks to have been delayed as it's no longer showing on the QHM Daily movements for today. I was going to go down and have a paddle in the water and watch her go out, it's rather warm down here again today, oh well.

inch
Senior Member
Posts: 1313
Joined: 27 May 2015, 21:35

Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion

Post by inch »

Covid delay again I wonder ?

Post Reply