River Class (OPV) (RN)

Contains threads on Royal Navy equipment of the past, present and future.
S M H
Member
Posts: 433
Joined: 03 May 2015, 12:59
United Kingdom

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by S M H »

shark bait wrote:Not buying that. Its a waste of highly trained (expensive) military personnel
Having done boarding inspections from military and civil agency vessels the military boarding request was always complied with. The additional advantage that military vessels had was the universal understanding of S.N. backed up by few rounds across the bow for the hard of hearing or belligerent. I have had to follow a vessels at a discreet distance several times when civilian crewed until the navy turned up. The fishery squadron duties may be tasked to civil crewed agencies for political ideological reasons as per Scotland. However funding the navy to do it. Along with other duties is in fact a better solution as it shows presence in our waters while providing a development ladder for command training for the navy . The Fishery squadron benefits all if managed correctly. If anything the batch 1 rivers should be retained for R.N. R. manning to augment the Fishery squadron with the return of control of our fishing grounds responsibility from Europe.

Caribbean
Senior Member
Posts: 2819
Joined: 09 Jan 2016, 19:08
United Kingdom

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by Caribbean »

Would a mixture of RFA and RNR crews work, do you think?
The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty.
Winston Churchill

User avatar
ArmChairCivvy
Senior Member
Posts: 16312
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
United Kingdom

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by ArmChairCivvy »

S M H wrote:The fishery squadron duties may be tasked to civil crewed agencies for political ideological reasons as per Scotland. However funding the navy to do it. Along with other duties is in fact a better solution as it shows presence in our waters while providing a development ladder for command training for the navy . The Fishery squadron benefits all if managed correctly.
Fully agree.

The ships were initially taken "onboard" with a lease deal (saving cash within the defence budget that has a yearly focus) and DEFRA paid the running costs (not sure if crew counted as such).
- buying the River 1s outright points to the intention of selling them, but who says that it would have to be a foreign buyer
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)

Repulse
Donator
Posts: 4700
Joined: 05 May 2015, 22:46
United Kingdom

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by Repulse »

HMS Medway is out of the construction shed. Can't find a picture to link but plenty on Twitter.
”We have no eternal allies, and we have no perpetual enemies. Our interests are eternal and perpetual, and those interests it is our duty to follow." - Lord Palmerston

User avatar
SKB
Senior Member
Posts: 7943
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:35
England

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by SKB »


Image

User avatar
ArmChairCivvy
Senior Member
Posts: 16312
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
United Kingdom

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by ArmChairCivvy »

I can see they have brought the Seaslug back; there is a launcher (aft) :lol:
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)

dmereifield
Senior Member
Posts: 2762
Joined: 03 Aug 2016, 20:29
United Kingdom

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by dmereifield »

ArmChairCivvy wrote:I can see they have brought the Seaslug back; there is a launcher (aft) :lol:
And replaced the 30mm with a rather large mortar...

User avatar
SKB
Senior Member
Posts: 7943
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:35
England

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by SKB »

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
HMS Medway (P223) on 15th August 2017
(River Clyde Photography)

donald_of_tokyo
Senior Member
Posts: 5570
Joined: 06 May 2015, 13:18
Japan

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by donald_of_tokyo »

SKB wrote:Image
Beautiful photo!

See the "center of gravity mark" around the funnel. (It was not shown in the case of HMS Forth). It is right at the forward end of the main engine room. This means, if River B3 with extended hull is to come in future, inserting 5-10m hull here = right before the engine room will be the easiest solution.

Since the center of the hull is generating majority of buoyancy, if with 10m extension here, both bow and stern can be extended, and/or adding more sure-structure is possible.

User avatar
SKB
Senior Member
Posts: 7943
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:35
England

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by SKB »

donald_of_tokyo wrote: See the "center of gravity mark" around the funnel. (It was not shown in the case of HMS Forth).
Image
Look again ^ ;)

User avatar
SKB
Senior Member
Posts: 7943
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:35
England

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by SKB »

HMS Medway P223.jpg
A little bigger.

donald_of_tokyo
Senior Member
Posts: 5570
Joined: 06 May 2015, 13:18
Japan

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by donald_of_tokyo »

SKB wrote:Look again ^ ;)
Oh, thanks !

In what I checked, it was not shown... ;)
https://ukdjstatic-b4d.kxcdn.com/wp-con ... sforth.jpg
https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-p_NU3HXOcYs/ ... 8%2BPM.JPG

Repulse
Donator
Posts: 4700
Joined: 05 May 2015, 22:46
United Kingdom

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by Repulse »

HMS Mersey in Falmouth at the moment. I wonder how much it would cost to upgrade the original 3 B1s to be the same specification as HMS Clyde? Having the B1s able to lillipad ASW Merlins in UK EEZ would allow others for global duties.
”We have no eternal allies, and we have no perpetual enemies. Our interests are eternal and perpetual, and those interests it is our duty to follow." - Lord Palmerston

Ron5
Donator
Posts: 7306
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:42
United States of America

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by Ron5 »

Used to think they were ugly little ships but they're growing on me. Congrats RN.

P.S. Amazing level of completion. Not like the old days.

Caribbean
Senior Member
Posts: 2819
Joined: 09 Jan 2016, 19:08
United Kingdom

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by Caribbean »

Is it me, or does that COG marker appear to be higher on Medway than on Forth?
The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty.
Winston Churchill

Repulse
Donator
Posts: 4700
Joined: 05 May 2015, 22:46
United Kingdom

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by Repulse »

Caribbean wrote:Is it me, or does that COG marker appear to be higher on Medway than on Forth?
Agree, it does look higher on Medway. Perhaps it's the VLS they snuck in :)
”We have no eternal allies, and we have no perpetual enemies. Our interests are eternal and perpetual, and those interests it is our duty to follow." - Lord Palmerston

Repulse
Donator
Posts: 4700
Joined: 05 May 2015, 22:46
United Kingdom

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by Repulse »

Repulse wrote:HMS Mersey in Falmouth at the moment
Got it wrong :( It is HMS Tyne, apparently undergoing refit. Wonder if it's life will be spare for time as the GiGS?
”We have no eternal allies, and we have no perpetual enemies. Our interests are eternal and perpetual, and those interests it is our duty to follow." - Lord Palmerston

User avatar
SKB
Senior Member
Posts: 7943
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:35
England

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by SKB »

Image
HMS Medway on 20th August

User avatar
hovematlot
Member
Posts: 268
Joined: 27 May 2015, 17:46
United Kingdom

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by hovematlot »

HMS Forth commencing sea trials


User avatar
2HeadsBetter
Member
Posts: 206
Joined: 12 Dec 2015, 16:21
United Kingdom

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by 2HeadsBetter »

Beaten to it but better late than never:


User avatar
RichardIC
Senior Member
Posts: 1377
Joined: 10 May 2015, 16:59
United Kingdom

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by RichardIC »

And she's on Marine Traffic... and she's already made 24.6 knots!!!!

Rambo
Member
Posts: 111
Joined: 13 May 2015, 21:29

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by Rambo »

Looking at those pics i can just visualize some Harpoon deck mounted aft of the funnel and replace the pea shooter with a Phalanx up front.

LordJim
Member
Posts: 454
Joined: 28 Apr 2016, 00:39
United Kingdom

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by LordJim »

Great now lets order another 5 with a Bofors 57mm up front

andrew98
Member
Posts: 197
Joined: 05 May 2015, 22:28
United Kingdom

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by andrew98 »

LordJim wrote:Great now lets order another 5 with a Bofors 57mm up front
Ffs no! Do not introduce yet another type of weapon system.
Either 5" or 30mm (maybe with LMM launcher) or just 20mm phalanx. But no different gun.

User avatar
ArmChairCivvy
Senior Member
Posts: 16312
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
United Kingdom

Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)

Post by ArmChairCivvy »

andrew98 wrote:Either 5" or 30mm (maybe with LMM launcher) or just 20mm phalanx. But no different gun.
Recycling some 4.5" - in open mounts; a nice budgetary option :)
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)

Post Reply