SKB wrote:If only 10%, what gives them the right to sell it as a Lockheed Martin product?
Poiuytrewq wrote:SeaRam only on Canada's Type 26. No Phalanx
RetroSicotte wrote:Anyone got a clear picture of the front silos? Still uncertain how many are on it.
Simon82 wrote:I’d also like to know whether they’re all the same variant or some mix of 303” strike length, 266” tactical variant and 209” self-defence variant. I have a sneaking suspicion that the foremost Mk.41 module, which is located where the SeaCepter silos are on the Royal Navy variant might be self-defence (ESSM) only.
The 32 Mk41 configuration seems to be an 8 cell module in front of the 24 as per UK configuration and not the 32 setup as the Australians have. Everyone so far has a different configuration which I guess is not a bad thing as it shows flexibility.Simon82 wrote:I don’t have a clear picture I’m afraid, but it looks like it’s 4 x 8 cell modules on the model at Euronaval 2018. So, 32 Mk.41 silos in all. Although you’re right, the configuration seems to differ depending in which model/graphic you are viewing.
EDIT: The Mk. 41 silos are quite clearly visible at the 0.47 mark in this video from Naval Recognition. Thank you Xavier and crew.
I’d also like to know whether they’re all the same variant or some mix of 303” strike length, 266” tactical variant and 209” self-defence variant. I have a sneaking suspicion that the foremost Mk.41 module, which is located where the SeaCepter silos are on the Royal Navy variant might be self-defence (ESSM) only.
matt00773 wrote:And hull completion by the end of 2020 and possible launch early 2021. Seems to be a very long time to outfit and test prior to commissioning in 2025. The aircraft carrier was outfitted and tested quicker than that.
ArmChairCivvy wrote:Lord Jim wrote:entry into service of the first of class.
'27 for the T-26
but isn't it '23 in the water for T-31; have not seen an in-service date?
inch wrote:Does anybody know which countries might seriously consider t26 derivative in future or is that it in reality for t26 sales or got their own programs or just 2 expensive ? As Ive said before be great NZ Brazil etc but in reality I think that's it for foreign future sales ,but it's not done bad I guess anyway
Ron5 wrote:I thought 2023 was in service.
Caribbean wrote:suppose it's rather like us contemplating the possibility of buying German tanks
xav wrote:Likelihood of RN (and RAN and RCN) getting this (Vulcano) for their Type 26 ? They were the "launch customer" for that automated handling system after all ...
Users browsing this forum: cky7 and 15 guests