donald_of_tokyo wrote:abc123 wrote:Better to have 18 IH-based ships with ASW capabilities added than 6 Type 26. At least IMHO. That's way more work for Clyde. But, when I Said cancel, I meant before they were started, not now.
Anyway, IH-based ship, if it is 1/3 of cost of T26, there will be no ASW kits onboard. I mean, T31e with 250M GBP cost "cannot" have any ASW kits (may be other than small hull mounted sonar).
If you add ASW, the best will be 1/2 of T26 and I bet even more.
I agree that with ASW kit ( towed sonar and other things ) it will cost more than GP Type 31, but: a) you have to buy that for Type 26 too, b) IH has torpedo launchers, while Type 26 has not ( some here might disparage them, but I would certainly rather have them than not ), c) both designs can have Mk41 with ASROC, d) I admit that Type 26 is better constructed for silence, but 6 is 6 and 12 is 12.
She can be as silent as mice, but she can't be in 12 places at the same time. And anyway, the most important ASW weapon today is Merlin, and she can carry Merlin just as well as Type 26. Also, what British IH will not have ( Standard missiles and sofisticated radars ) will be replaced with ASW kit. I don't think that the cost difference is big- proably even cheaper.
Anyway, I'm big proponent of Sergei Gorshkov's adage: The best is the enemy of good enough. And even Stalin's: Quantity has quality of it's own- has it's merits.
Fortune favors brave sir, said Carrot cheerfully.
What's her position about heavily armed, well prepared and overmanned armies?
Oh, noone's ever heard of Fortune favoring them, sir.
According to General Tacticus, it's because they favor themselves…