Type 26 Frigate (City Class) (RN) [News Only]

Contains threads on Royal Navy equipment of the past, present and future.

Which Anti-Ship Missile Should be Selected for the Type 26?

Lockheed Martin LRASM
164
52%
Kongsberg NSM
78
25%
Boeing Harpoon Next Gen
44
14%
MBDA Exocet Blk III
21
7%
None (stick to guided ammo and FASGW from Helicopters)
8
3%
 
Total votes: 315

SDL
Member
Posts: 763
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 20:52
United Kingdom

Re: Type 26 Global Combat Ship [News Only]

Post by SDL »

I think Sturgeon has just killed off shipbuilding in Scotland with this move. The T26 & T31 programs will have to be delayed until after any IndyRef2 happens (Unless May tells Sturgeon to eff off). MOD have to now start seriously considering returning shipbuilding to England.

User avatar
RichardIC
Senior Member
Posts: 1377
Joined: 10 May 2015, 16:59
United Kingdom

Re: Type 26 Global Combat Ship [News Only]

Post by RichardIC »

It was always going to be an inevitable consequence of Brexit, but the world has to keep on turning. And if there is going to be an Indy Ref 2 then the priority has to be a bigger No vote than the last one - so let's close down shipbuilding on the Clyde? That's really going to help!

The initial order is for three vessels. The navy needs ships, the Clyde needs the work, the union needs Scotland.

Chippy Little Englanders may not agree but, and I speak as someone with proudly Anglo-Scots ancestry, they can go and hang. They're cut from The same cloth as the Scots Nats.

abc123
Senior Member
Posts: 2903
Joined: 10 May 2015, 18:15
United Kingdom

Re: Type 26 Global Combat Ship [News Only]

Post by abc123 »

SKB wrote:Build them in Portsmouth and/or Tyneside.

Or get South Korea to build the hulls for us for a fraction of the cost and in a shorter time a la Tide class. Then ship them to the UK for fitting out. Maybe with the money saved, we could actually have 13 T26's instead of 8! ;)
X
Fortune favors brave sir, said Carrot cheerfully.
What's her position about heavily armed, well prepared and overmanned armies?
Oh, noone's ever heard of Fortune favoring them, sir.
According to General Tacticus, it's because they favor themselves…

dmereifield
Senior Member
Posts: 2762
Joined: 03 Aug 2016, 20:29
United Kingdom

Re: Type 26 Global Combat Ship [News Only]

Post by dmereifield »

RichardIC wrote:It was always going to be an inevitable consequence of Brexit, but the world has to keep on turning. And if there is going to be an Indy Ref 2 then the priority has to be a bigger No vote than the last one - so let's close down shipbuilding on the Clyde, that's really going to help!

The initial order is for three vessels. The navy needs ships, the Clyde needs the work, the union needs Scotland. Chippy Little Englanders may not agree but, and I speak as someone with proudly Anglo-Scots ancestry, they can go and hang. They're cut from The same cloth as the Scots Nat's.
Good points. A good solution is to continue with the first batch of 3 and then take it from there....
Off topic here, but May should agree that a referendum be held once the post Brexit UK-EU deal has been established

SDL
Member
Posts: 763
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 20:52
United Kingdom

Re: Type 26 Global Combat Ship [News Only]

Post by SDL »

If/When Scotland leave... where would be the best location to build the T26s (and T31s)?

User avatar
SKB
Senior Member
Posts: 7943
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:35
England

Re: Type 26 Global Combat Ship [News Only]

Post by SKB »

Obviously Portsmouth for surface fleet, as all the nuclear subs would go to Devonport.

Lets keep this a T26 News thead only please. Scottish indy ref political questions and debate should be in that thread. http://ukdefenceforum.net/viewtopic.php ... 397#p42397

marktigger
Senior Member
Posts: 4640
Joined: 01 May 2015, 10:22
United Kingdom

Re: Type 26 Global Combat Ship [News Only]

Post by marktigger »

plymouth for the type 26 & 31. 45 would be the best shifting as well base

User avatar
xav
Senior Member
Posts: 1626
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 22:48

Re: Type 26 Global Combat Ship [News Only]

Post by xav »

Raytheon Anschütz advances with the Type 26 GCS Integrated Navigation and Bridge System
Raytheon Anschütz, a German-based leader in naval bridge system integration, has achieved several key milestones toward the Integrated Navigation and Bridge System (INBS) for the UK Royal Navy’s new Type 26 Global Combat Ships. Under the current contract, Raytheon Anschütz will deliver the INBS, including customer-specific design and development, a land-based integration facility, and a wide range of services through completion of sea trials.
...
Throughout 2016, Raytheon Anschütz achieved several program milestones, on schedule, including: several risk reducing activities, the completion of the critical design review for the INBS, and the completion of radar integration trials with a Terma 6000 radar in order to provide a solid-state IMO-compliant, I-band navigational radar. Raytheon Anschütz is also integrating Government Furnished Equipment items.
http://www.navyrecognition.com/index.ph ... ystem.html

As Gabriele noted on Twitter, entire RN fleet gets Kelvin Hughes nav radars, yet T26 gets Terma

MikeKiloPapa
Member
Posts: 106
Joined: 06 May 2015, 11:10
Denmark

Re: Type 26 Global Combat Ship [News Only]

Post by MikeKiloPapa »

xav wrote:As Gabriele noted on Twitter, entire RN fleet gets Kelvin Hughes nav radars, yet T26 gets Terma
Well it could be an off-set related deal....though from what i dont know....its been quite a while since we(DK) bought something from BAE.

Alternatively it could just be to save money....the SCANTER 6000 is likely cheaper than K-Hs Sharpeye series equivalent. Price/performance ratio have always been one of Termas strongest selling points after all.

...Or maybe it was chosen simply because its a damn good piece of kit. If its as good or better than Sharpeye i cant say, but i do know that the 6000 series is getting a lot of international sales, so it cant be half-bad.

User avatar
ArmChairCivvy
Senior Member
Posts: 16312
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
United Kingdom

Re: Type 26 Global Combat Ship [News Only]

Post by ArmChairCivvy »

There could also be some off-the-shelf integration that comes in handy
"C-Guard Naval Decoy System - Terma
https://www.terma.com/defense/naval-sol ... oy-system/
Terma's C-Guard decoy launching system is made to defeat stream attack with multiple missiles and torpedoes from multiple directions."
without the "hardware" that is instantaneously activated necessarily being the same as in the earlier effected integration projects
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)

Caribbean
Senior Member
Posts: 2818
Joined: 09 Jan 2016, 19:08
United Kingdom

Re: Type 26 Global Combat Ship [News Only]

Post by Caribbean »

xav wrote:entire RN fleet gets Kelvin Hughes nav radars, yet T26 gets Terma
The River B2's got Scanter 4102's. It looks like the KH Sharpeye has been mainly used as a replacement on existing ships (it was designed as a replacement for the Type 1007, I believe). The exception being the QE's, which got the Sharpeye, IIRC. Maybe a change in direction? They seem pretty capable radars.
The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty.
Winston Churchill

User avatar
Gabriele
Senior Member
Posts: 1998
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:53
Contact:
Italy

Re: Type 26 Global Combat Ship [News Only]

Post by Gabriele »

River Batch 2 uses the Sharpeye for navigation and helicopter guidance, as part of fleet-wide adoption. The Scanter is their main surveillance sensor, instead. Sharpeye was also regularly included on the Tide tankers. It is the new standard fit in the fleet. The Type 26 mess up, considering the timeframes, is one of those "do the programme offices even speak to each other...?" moments.
You might also know me as Liger30, from that great forum than MP.net was.

Arma Pacis Fulcra.
Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum

abc123
Senior Member
Posts: 2903
Joined: 10 May 2015, 18:15
United Kingdom

Re: Type 26 Global Combat Ship [News Only]

Post by abc123 »

So, considering it's allready March 2017, any ideas about when contract for Type 26 manufacturing will be signed and manufacturing started?
Fortune favors brave sir, said Carrot cheerfully.
What's her position about heavily armed, well prepared and overmanned armies?
Oh, noone's ever heard of Fortune favoring them, sir.
According to General Tacticus, it's because they favor themselves…

90inFIRST
Member
Posts: 84
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 19:00
Contact:
United Kingdom

Re: Type 26 Global Combat Ship [News Only]

Post by 90inFIRST »

Couple of years time when we have bought yet another two OPV to keep the yards afloat?

FuNsTeR
Member
Posts: 151
Joined: 19 Jun 2015, 21:44

Re: Type 26 Global Combat Ship [News Only]

Post by FuNsTeR »

i can see us ending up with 6 type 26 and 8 type 31 due to budget constraints/underfunding, regardless what anybody thinks Brexit will hit our economy and the knock on affects will hit our armed forces, we badly need to start replacing the type 23s and we need to ensure the new ships don't suffer the same problems as the Type 45s

dmereifield
Senior Member
Posts: 2762
Joined: 03 Aug 2016, 20:29
United Kingdom

Re: Type 26 Global Combat Ship [News Only]

Post by dmereifield »

FuNsTeR wrote:i can see us ending up with 6 type 26 and 8 type 31 due to budget constraints/underfunding, regardless what anybody thinks Brexit will hit our economy and the knock on affects will hit our armed forces, we badly need to start replacing the type 23s and we need to ensure the new ships don't suffer the same problems as the Type 45s
I share the concern, but for it to materialise two of the T31s would need to be able to take the TAS, since there are 8 available and it's been made clear that this is the minimum required....

clinch
Member
Posts: 95
Joined: 28 Jul 2016, 16:47
United Kingdom

Re: Type 26 Global Combat Ship [News Only]

Post by clinch »

abc123 wrote:So, considering it's allready March 2017, any ideas about when contract for Type 26 manufacturing will be signed and manufacturing started?
Probably after Indy Ref 2.

User avatar
xav
Senior Member
Posts: 1626
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 22:48

Re: Type 26 Global Combat Ship [News Only]

Post by xav »

France & UK Launch Next-Gen Missile Project with MBDA to Replace Harpoon/Scalp/Exocet by 2030
Today in London, the United Kingdom and France have signed an agreement to launch a joint concept phase of the Future Cruise / Anti-Ship Weapon (FC/ASW) programme with MBDA. The agreement was signed by Laurent Collet-Billon, head of France’s Defence Procurement Agency (DGA - Direction générale de l’armement), and Harriet Baldwin, UK Minister of Defence Procurement.
...
Laurent Collet-Billon said: “We are launching today a major new phase in our bilateral cooperation, by planning together a generation of missiles, successor to the Exocet, Harpoon, SCALP and Storm Shadow. The FC/ASW (future cruise/anti-ship weapon) programme’s aim is to have by around 2030 a new generation of missiles. This future capability is strategic, industrially as well as operationally. This new programme will be the backbone of our “One Complex Weapons” initiative.”
http://www.navyrecognition.com/index.ph ... -2030.html

I wonder if they will go for speed (Brahmos / Zyrkon) or smart & stealth (LRAM / NSM) ... maybe both ?

donald_of_tokyo
Senior Member
Posts: 5570
Joined: 06 May 2015, 13:18
Japan

Re: Type 26 Global Combat Ship [News Only]

Post by donald_of_tokyo »

xav wrote: Laurent Collet-Billon said: “....aim is to have by around 2030 a new generation of missiles. ....”
Surely delay is expected. Then, 2035 will be "nominal", and none negligible possibility to extend to 2040. RN can enjoy a one whole generation of ASM/cruise missile as a "interim" solution. Let's go for, TLAM B4 for T26 and NSM for T23/T45 right now! :D

If not, RN will be going on with no cruise missile nor ASM for as ling as 20 years. No, not acceptable.

marktigger
Senior Member
Posts: 4640
Joined: 01 May 2015, 10:22
United Kingdom

Re: Type 26 Global Combat Ship [News Only]

Post by marktigger »

well theres's another 2 years delay with indyref2.

User avatar
ArmChairCivvy
Senior Member
Posts: 16312
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
United Kingdom

Re: Type 26 Global Combat Ship [News Only]

Post by ArmChairCivvy »

xav wrote:go for speed (Brahmos / Zyrkon)
Check out Brahmos II
- what/ whose is Zyrkon?
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)

User avatar
Gabriele
Senior Member
Posts: 1998
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:53
Contact:
Italy

Re: Type 26 Global Combat Ship [News Only]

Post by Gabriele »

Zyrkon is the new hypersonic anti-ship missile the russian navy is developing.
You might also know me as Liger30, from that great forum than MP.net was.

Arma Pacis Fulcra.
Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum

abc123
Senior Member
Posts: 2903
Joined: 10 May 2015, 18:15
United Kingdom

Re: Type 26 Global Combat Ship [News Only]

Post by abc123 »

xav wrote:France & UK Launch Next-Gen Missile Project with MBDA to Replace Harpoon/Scalp/Exocet by 2030
Today in London, the United Kingdom and France have signed an agreement to launch a joint concept phase of the Future Cruise / Anti-Ship Weapon (FC/ASW) programme with MBDA. The agreement was signed by Laurent Collet-Billon, head of France’s Defence Procurement Agency (DGA - Direction générale de l’armement), and Harriet Baldwin, UK Minister of Defence Procurement.
...
Laurent Collet-Billon said: “We are launching today a major new phase in our bilateral cooperation, by planning together a generation of missiles, successor to the Exocet, Harpoon, SCALP and Storm Shadow. The FC/ASW (future cruise/anti-ship weapon) programme’s aim is to have by around 2030 a new generation of missiles. This future capability is strategic, industrially as well as operationally. This new programme will be the backbone of our “One Complex Weapons” initiative.”
http://www.navyrecognition.com/index.ph ... -2030.html

I wonder if they will go for speed (Brahmos / Zyrkon) or smart & stealth (LRAM / NSM) ... maybe both ?
Most probably neither.
:lol:
Fortune favors brave sir, said Carrot cheerfully.
What's her position about heavily armed, well prepared and overmanned armies?
Oh, noone's ever heard of Fortune favoring them, sir.
According to General Tacticus, it's because they favor themselves…

User avatar
ArmChairCivvy
Senior Member
Posts: 16312
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:34
United Kingdom

Re: Type 26 Global Combat Ship [News Only]

Post by ArmChairCivvy »

Gabriele wrote:Zyrkon is the new hypersonic anti-ship missile the russian navy is developing.
Ahh, the Brahmos partner is moving on, on its own
- Brahmaputra (River)
- Moskva (River)
Ever-lasting truths: Multi-year budgets/ planning by necessity have to address the painful questions; more often than not the Either-Or prevails over Both-And.
If everyone is thinking the same, then someone is not thinking (attributed to Patton)

R686
Senior Member
Posts: 2324
Joined: 28 May 2015, 02:43
Australia

Re: Type 26 Global Combat Ship [News Only]

Post by R686 »

RFT out for RAN Sea 5000, T26 is part of the tender.

http://www.australiandefence.com.au/new ... e-frigates

And RN talking up the T26,

http://www.australiandefence.com.au/new ... 26-frigate

Post Reply