Type 26 Frigate (City Class) (RN) [News Only]

Contains threads on Royal Navy equipment of the past, present and future.

Which Anti-Ship Missile Should be Selected for the Type 26?

Lockheed Martin LRASM
164
52%
Kongsberg NSM
78
25%
Boeing Harpoon Next Gen
44
14%
MBDA Exocet Blk III
21
7%
None (stick to guided ammo and FASGW from Helicopters)
8
3%
 
Total votes: 315

bobp
Senior Member
Posts: 2698
Joined: 06 May 2015, 07:52
United Kingdom

Re: UK's Future T26 Frigate.

Post by bobp »

Yes foreign aid must be cut. Not saying we shouldn't help with disasters etc but aid for the sake of it is wrong when people at home are in need.

abc123
Senior Member
Posts: 2903
Joined: 10 May 2015, 18:15
United Kingdom

Re: UK's Future T26 Frigate.

Post by abc123 »

Gabriele wrote:Aid has got to be the first budget to be cut if cuts required. Like, immediately and without discussions. Perhaps with Cameron done the 0.7% of GDP nonsense can be killed off.

Far too smard decision for the UK politicians... ;) If Corbyn becomes the PM you can expect aid will be 7%, not 0,7%... :lol:
Fortune favors brave sir, said Carrot cheerfully.
What's her position about heavily armed, well prepared and overmanned armies?
Oh, noone's ever heard of Fortune favoring them, sir.
According to General Tacticus, it's because they favor themselves…

Ron5
Donator
Posts: 7298
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:42
United States of America

Re: UK's Future T26 Frigate.

Post by Ron5 »

Halidon wrote:
Ron5 wrote:
Halidon wrote:Properly applied foreign aid is contributing to the defence of the country sending it.
Huh? What on earth gives you that idea?
History.
Glad we got that cleared up.

User avatar
GibMariner
Senior Member
Posts: 1351
Joined: 12 May 2015, 14:17

Re: UK's Future T26 Frigate.

Post by GibMariner »

Type 26 Frigates:Written question - 41166

Asked by Ian Murray
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what assessment he has made of the effect of changes to the timetable for work to commence on building the new Type 26 Frigate on the skills base in the affected shipyards.
Type 26 Frigates:Written question - 41167

Asked by Ian Murray
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what assessment he has made of the effect of changes to the timetable for work to commence on building the new Type 26 Frigate on the recruitment and retention of workers in the affected shipyards.
Type 26 Frigates:Written question - 41168

Asked by Ian Murray
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what assessment he has made of the effect of changes to the timetable for work to commence on building the new Type 26 Frigate on the recruitment and training of apprentices in the affected shipyards.
Answered by: Mr Philip Dunne
I refer the hon. Member to the oral answer I gave during Defence questions in the House on 27 June 2016 to the hon. Member for Rutherglen and Hamilton West (Margaret Ferrier).
The Government have already invested £1.6 billion in the Type 26 programme. We will only enter into a contract once we are confident of the delivery schedule and the ability of the contractors to meet that schedule on a cost effective basis.
http://www.parliament.uk/business/publi ... -24/41166/
http://www.parliament.uk/business/publi ... -24/41167/
http://www.parliament.uk/business/publi ... -24/41168/

marktigger
Senior Member
Posts: 4640
Joined: 01 May 2015, 10:22
United Kingdom

Re: UK's Future T26 Frigate.

Post by marktigger »

so basically they are playing chicken with BaE

Ron5
Donator
Posts: 7298
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:42
United States of America

Re: UK's Future T26 Frigate.

Post by Ron5 »

With a customer like the MoD, who needs enemies?

S M H
Member
Posts: 433
Joined: 03 May 2015, 12:59
United Kingdom

Re: UK's Future T26 Frigate.

Post by S M H »

With a customers previous sales experience They be better of with purchasing from our enemies. If they don't get this contract for production right!

FuNsTeR
Member
Posts: 151
Joined: 19 Jun 2015, 21:44

Re: UK's Future T26 Frigate.

Post by FuNsTeR »

quite simply their is no money in the kitty at present to purchase the type 26 we could have a situation where the QEC carrier group consists of type 23 frigates :|

as for the Scottish situation I can only conclude one out come, they will vote to leave the UK that is why the next PM must divert all monies and support from the Clyde to Portsmouth, lets be honest it was a political motivated decision to close down Portsmouth in favour of Clyde and it is time that decision is reversed

Ron5
Donator
Posts: 7298
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:42
United States of America

Re: UK's Future T26 Frigate.

Post by Ron5 »

There was a discussion not long ago, I think on this thread, on the merits of placing a mission bay and/or helicopter hangar under the flight deck. Personally, it's not an idea that rox my sox, but I did catch these photo's in a recent online article about the Russian Project 20386 corvette.

So for your interest:

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

User avatar
Gabriele
Senior Member
Posts: 1998
Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 18:53
Contact:
Italy

Re: UK's Future T26 Frigate.

Post by Gabriele »

quite simply their is no money in the kitty at present to purchase the type 26 we could have a situation where the QEC carrier group consists of type 23 frigates
Regardless of what happens next with Type 26, we are 110% certain of seeing Type 23 escorting QE class groups for well over a decade, considering the planned In and Out dates.
as for the Scottish situation I can only conclude one out come, they will vote to leave the UK
If the majority of scots are truly so insane to rush after Nicola, i pray them to do so quickly at least, before more money and time is wasted on infrastructure investment in Faslane, Lossiemouth and so on.

I still hope common sense can prevail. But the country cannot be held at ransom forever with neverendum threats. In a sense or in another, this story needs to end.
You might also know me as Liger30, from that great forum than MP.net was.

Arma Pacis Fulcra.
Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum

bobp
Senior Member
Posts: 2698
Joined: 06 May 2015, 07:52
United Kingdom

Re: UK's Future T26 Frigate.

Post by bobp »

Things are looking grim now, but hopefully not for long. As for Nicola let them go. Scotland is heavily subsidised by the rest of the UK.

User avatar
WhitestElephant
Member
Posts: 389
Joined: 06 May 2015, 10:57
United Kingdom

Re: UK's Future T26 Frigate.

Post by WhitestElephant »

Ron5 wrote:There was a discussion not long ago, I think on this thread, on the merits of placing a mission bay and/or helicopter hangar under the flight deck. Personally, it's not an idea that rox my sox, but I did catch these photo's in a recent online article about the Russian Project 20386 corvette.

So for your interest:
That is what we should do for the future MHPC. Modify the current River-class design.
Though we are not now that strength which in old days moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are. - Lord Tennyson (Ulysses)

Dahedd
Member
Posts: 660
Joined: 06 May 2015, 11:18

Re: UK's Future T26 Frigate.

Post by Dahedd »

That Russian design is rather impressive.

What are the pros & cons of having the hanger under the landing platform ?

marktigger
Senior Member
Posts: 4640
Joined: 01 May 2015, 10:22
United Kingdom

Re: UK's Future T26 Frigate.

Post by marktigger »

cons:-

1.over complication
2.loss of limited space to elevator equipment

User avatar
RichardIC
Senior Member
Posts: 1377
Joined: 10 May 2015, 16:59
United Kingdom

Re: UK's Future T26 Frigate.

Post by RichardIC »

marktigger wrote:1.over complication
Scissor lifts - never caused any problems whatsoever on the Invincibles!

Totally off-topic now, sorry.

marktigger
Senior Member
Posts: 4640
Joined: 01 May 2015, 10:22
United Kingdom

Re: UK's Future T26 Frigate.

Post by marktigger »

RichardIC wrote:
marktigger wrote:1.over complication
Scissor lifts - never caused any problems whatsoever on the Invincibles!
did the lifts work 100% of the time? If the lift is also the landing site and it Fails and you can't land on what do you do if you are an isolated vessel and the helo hasn't the range to make another platform/base do you just ditch a multimillion pound helicopter?

donald_of_tokyo
Senior Member
Posts: 5570
Joined: 06 May 2015, 13:18
Japan

Re: UK's Future T26 Frigate.

Post by donald_of_tokyo »

marktigger wrote:did the lifts work 100% of the time? If the lift is also the landing site and it Fails and you can't land on what do you do if you are an isolated vessel and the helo hasn't the range to make another platform/base do you just ditch a multimillion pound helicopter?
It looks like the landing spot is some what astern of the elevator. I think, with elevator up, it become a "Chinook capable" landing deck, while even with the elevator down, can handle mid-sized helicopter to land.

However, I personally think elevator is not a good choice. It requires more maintenance load than a simple hangar (complex). At least for an OPV, not a good choice. For frigates, maybe good, but just if really needed.

I my self do not think helicopter must be carried below the flight deck. Nowadays, frigate are so large, so a bit higher flight deck is not a big issue. See JSDF Hatsuyuki class DD made on 1980s. The flight deck is 1 deck higher. See also Spruans-class DD of USN. Your T26 is as large as latter, and T31/GPFF will be similar to the former. So, I see no problem for "under-flight- deck mission bay" in both size, i.e. 4000t FL or 8000t FL.

marktigger
Senior Member
Posts: 4640
Joined: 01 May 2015, 10:22
United Kingdom

Re: UK's Future T26 Frigate.

Post by marktigger »

there is a saying in the military K.I.S.S Keep It Simple Stupid

adding complexity just makes things more likely go wrong a straight forward flight deck and hanger is bot flexible and simple

User avatar
GibMariner
Senior Member
Posts: 1351
Joined: 12 May 2015, 14:17

Re: UK's Future T26 Frigate.

Post by GibMariner »

Type 26 Frigates:Written question - 41867

Asked by Mr Nigel Evans
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, whether his Department is still planning to purchase 13 Type 26 Ships.
Answered by: Mr Philip Dunne
The 2015 Strategic Defence and Security Review (SDSR) endorsed the requirement for eight of the anti-submarine warfare variant of the Type 26 Global Combat Ship to replace the eight Type 23 frigates that currently fulfil this role. The SDSR also concluded that the remainder of the Navy's future frigate requirement would be better met by a new class of lighter, flexible, general purpose frigates.
http://www.parliament.uk/business/publi ... -05/41867/

Ron5
Donator
Posts: 7298
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:42
United States of America

Re: UK's Future T26 Frigate.

Post by Ron5 »

GibMariner wrote:Type 26 Frigates:Written question - 41867

Asked by Mr Nigel Evans
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, whether his Department is still planning to purchase 13 Type 26 Ships.
Answered by: Mr Philip Dunne
The 2015 Strategic Defence and Security Review (SDSR) endorsed the requirement for eight of the anti-submarine warfare variant of the Type 26 Global Combat Ship to replace the eight Type 23 frigates that currently fulfil this role. The SDSR also concluded that the remainder of the Navy's future frigate requirement would be better met by a new class of lighter, flexible, general purpose frigates.
http://www.parliament.uk/business/publi ... -05/41867/
That has to be the dumbest question even the dumb British politicians have ever asked. And why the heck is he asking? He's a conservative in a welsh constituency. No connection to defense that I can see.

marktigger
Senior Member
Posts: 4640
Joined: 01 May 2015, 10:22
United Kingdom

Re: UK's Future T26 Frigate.

Post by marktigger »

will anything be resolved over the T26 until sturgeon backs down?

FuNsTeR
Member
Posts: 151
Joined: 19 Jun 2015, 21:44

Re: UK's Future T26 Frigate.

Post by FuNsTeR »

marktigger wrote:will anything be resolved over the T26 until sturgeon backs down?
she won't back down mark it would be political suicide for her

jimthelad
Member
Posts: 510
Joined: 14 May 2015, 20:16
United Kingdom

Re: UK's Future T26 Frigate.

Post by jimthelad »

heres hoping.

User avatar
cockneyjock1974
Member
Posts: 537
Joined: 01 May 2015, 09:43
United Kingdom

Re: UK's Future T26 Frigate.

Post by cockneyjock1974 »

jimthelad wrote:heres hoping.
Amen

Ron5
Donator
Posts: 7298
Joined: 05 May 2015, 21:42
United States of America

Re: UK's Future T26 Frigate.

Post by Ron5 »

FuNsTeR wrote:
marktigger wrote:will anything be resolved over the T26 until sturgeon backs down?
she won't back down mark it would be political suicide for her
My guess is that the current(?) meeting between May and Sturgeon will see a T26 order pretty soon as a sign of May's good intent.

The holdup has been Pinocchio George, now that he's history, the biggest obstacle is out of the way.

I got $20 on it. Any takers?

Post Reply