Type 26 Frigate (City Class) (RN) [News Only]
Re: UK's Future T26 Frigate.
Yes foreign aid must be cut. Not saying we shouldn't help with disasters etc but aid for the sake of it is wrong when people at home are in need.
Re: UK's Future T26 Frigate.
Gabriele wrote:Aid has got to be the first budget to be cut if cuts required. Like, immediately and without discussions. Perhaps with Cameron done the 0.7% of GDP nonsense can be killed off.
Far too smard decision for the UK politicians... If Corbyn becomes the PM you can expect aid will be 7%, not 0,7%...
Fortune favors brave sir, said Carrot cheerfully.
What's her position about heavily armed, well prepared and overmanned armies?
Oh, noone's ever heard of Fortune favoring them, sir.
According to General Tacticus, it's because they favor themselves…
What's her position about heavily armed, well prepared and overmanned armies?
Oh, noone's ever heard of Fortune favoring them, sir.
According to General Tacticus, it's because they favor themselves…
Re: UK's Future T26 Frigate.
Glad we got that cleared up.Halidon wrote:History.Ron5 wrote:Huh? What on earth gives you that idea?Halidon wrote:Properly applied foreign aid is contributing to the defence of the country sending it.
- GibMariner
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1351
- Joined: 12 May 2015, 14:17
Re: UK's Future T26 Frigate.
Type 26 Frigates:Written question - 41166
Asked by Ian Murray
Asked by Ian Murray
Asked by Ian Murray
http://www.parliament.uk/business/publi ... -24/41167/
http://www.parliament.uk/business/publi ... -24/41168/
Asked by Ian Murray
Type 26 Frigates:Written question - 41167To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what assessment he has made of the effect of changes to the timetable for work to commence on building the new Type 26 Frigate on the skills base in the affected shipyards.
Asked by Ian Murray
Type 26 Frigates:Written question - 41168To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what assessment he has made of the effect of changes to the timetable for work to commence on building the new Type 26 Frigate on the recruitment and retention of workers in the affected shipyards.
Asked by Ian Murray
Answered by: Mr Philip DunneTo ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what assessment he has made of the effect of changes to the timetable for work to commence on building the new Type 26 Frigate on the recruitment and training of apprentices in the affected shipyards.
http://www.parliament.uk/business/publi ... -24/41166/I refer the hon. Member to the oral answer I gave during Defence questions in the House on 27 June 2016 to the hon. Member for Rutherglen and Hamilton West (Margaret Ferrier).
The Government have already invested £1.6 billion in the Type 26 programme. We will only enter into a contract once we are confident of the delivery schedule and the ability of the contractors to meet that schedule on a cost effective basis.
http://www.parliament.uk/business/publi ... -24/41167/
http://www.parliament.uk/business/publi ... -24/41168/
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4640
- Joined: 01 May 2015, 10:22
Re: UK's Future T26 Frigate.
With a customers previous sales experience They be better of with purchasing from our enemies. If they don't get this contract for production right!
Re: UK's Future T26 Frigate.
quite simply their is no money in the kitty at present to purchase the type 26 we could have a situation where the QEC carrier group consists of type 23 frigates
as for the Scottish situation I can only conclude one out come, they will vote to leave the UK that is why the next PM must divert all monies and support from the Clyde to Portsmouth, lets be honest it was a political motivated decision to close down Portsmouth in favour of Clyde and it is time that decision is reversed
as for the Scottish situation I can only conclude one out come, they will vote to leave the UK that is why the next PM must divert all monies and support from the Clyde to Portsmouth, lets be honest it was a political motivated decision to close down Portsmouth in favour of Clyde and it is time that decision is reversed
Re: UK's Future T26 Frigate.
There was a discussion not long ago, I think on this thread, on the merits of placing a mission bay and/or helicopter hangar under the flight deck. Personally, it's not an idea that rox my sox, but I did catch these photo's in a recent online article about the Russian Project 20386 corvette.
So for your interest:
So for your interest:
Re: UK's Future T26 Frigate.
Regardless of what happens next with Type 26, we are 110% certain of seeing Type 23 escorting QE class groups for well over a decade, considering the planned In and Out dates.quite simply their is no money in the kitty at present to purchase the type 26 we could have a situation where the QEC carrier group consists of type 23 frigates
If the majority of scots are truly so insane to rush after Nicola, i pray them to do so quickly at least, before more money and time is wasted on infrastructure investment in Faslane, Lossiemouth and so on.as for the Scottish situation I can only conclude one out come, they will vote to leave the UK
I still hope common sense can prevail. But the country cannot be held at ransom forever with neverendum threats. In a sense or in another, this story needs to end.
You might also know me as Liger30, from that great forum than MP.net was.
Arma Pacis Fulcra.
Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum
Arma Pacis Fulcra.
Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum
Re: UK's Future T26 Frigate.
Things are looking grim now, but hopefully not for long. As for Nicola let them go. Scotland is heavily subsidised by the rest of the UK.
- WhitestElephant
- Member
- Posts: 389
- Joined: 06 May 2015, 10:57
Re: UK's Future T26 Frigate.
That is what we should do for the future MHPC. Modify the current River-class design.Ron5 wrote:There was a discussion not long ago, I think on this thread, on the merits of placing a mission bay and/or helicopter hangar under the flight deck. Personally, it's not an idea that rox my sox, but I did catch these photo's in a recent online article about the Russian Project 20386 corvette.
So for your interest:
Though we are not now that strength which in old days moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are. - Lord Tennyson (Ulysses)
Re: UK's Future T26 Frigate.
That Russian design is rather impressive.
What are the pros & cons of having the hanger under the landing platform ?
What are the pros & cons of having the hanger under the landing platform ?
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4640
- Joined: 01 May 2015, 10:22
Re: UK's Future T26 Frigate.
cons:-
1.over complication
2.loss of limited space to elevator equipment
1.over complication
2.loss of limited space to elevator equipment
Re: UK's Future T26 Frigate.
Scissor lifts - never caused any problems whatsoever on the Invincibles!marktigger wrote:1.over complication
Totally off-topic now, sorry.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4640
- Joined: 01 May 2015, 10:22
Re: UK's Future T26 Frigate.
did the lifts work 100% of the time? If the lift is also the landing site and it Fails and you can't land on what do you do if you are an isolated vessel and the helo hasn't the range to make another platform/base do you just ditch a multimillion pound helicopter?RichardIC wrote:Scissor lifts - never caused any problems whatsoever on the Invincibles!marktigger wrote:1.over complication
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 5570
- Joined: 06 May 2015, 13:18
Re: UK's Future T26 Frigate.
It looks like the landing spot is some what astern of the elevator. I think, with elevator up, it become a "Chinook capable" landing deck, while even with the elevator down, can handle mid-sized helicopter to land.marktigger wrote:did the lifts work 100% of the time? If the lift is also the landing site and it Fails and you can't land on what do you do if you are an isolated vessel and the helo hasn't the range to make another platform/base do you just ditch a multimillion pound helicopter?
However, I personally think elevator is not a good choice. It requires more maintenance load than a simple hangar (complex). At least for an OPV, not a good choice. For frigates, maybe good, but just if really needed.
I my self do not think helicopter must be carried below the flight deck. Nowadays, frigate are so large, so a bit higher flight deck is not a big issue. See JSDF Hatsuyuki class DD made on 1980s. The flight deck is 1 deck higher. See also Spruans-class DD of USN. Your T26 is as large as latter, and T31/GPFF will be similar to the former. So, I see no problem for "under-flight- deck mission bay" in both size, i.e. 4000t FL or 8000t FL.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4640
- Joined: 01 May 2015, 10:22
Re: UK's Future T26 Frigate.
there is a saying in the military K.I.S.S Keep It Simple Stupid
adding complexity just makes things more likely go wrong a straight forward flight deck and hanger is bot flexible and simple
adding complexity just makes things more likely go wrong a straight forward flight deck and hanger is bot flexible and simple
- GibMariner
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1351
- Joined: 12 May 2015, 14:17
Re: UK's Future T26 Frigate.
Type 26 Frigates:Written question - 41867
Asked by Mr Nigel Evans
Asked by Mr Nigel Evans
Answered by: Mr Philip DunneTo ask the Secretary of State for Defence, whether his Department is still planning to purchase 13 Type 26 Ships.
http://www.parliament.uk/business/publi ... -05/41867/The 2015 Strategic Defence and Security Review (SDSR) endorsed the requirement for eight of the anti-submarine warfare variant of the Type 26 Global Combat Ship to replace the eight Type 23 frigates that currently fulfil this role. The SDSR also concluded that the remainder of the Navy's future frigate requirement would be better met by a new class of lighter, flexible, general purpose frigates.
Re: UK's Future T26 Frigate.
That has to be the dumbest question even the dumb British politicians have ever asked. And why the heck is he asking? He's a conservative in a welsh constituency. No connection to defense that I can see.GibMariner wrote:Type 26 Frigates:Written question - 41867
Asked by Mr Nigel EvansAnswered by: Mr Philip DunneTo ask the Secretary of State for Defence, whether his Department is still planning to purchase 13 Type 26 Ships.http://www.parliament.uk/business/publi ... -05/41867/The 2015 Strategic Defence and Security Review (SDSR) endorsed the requirement for eight of the anti-submarine warfare variant of the Type 26 Global Combat Ship to replace the eight Type 23 frigates that currently fulfil this role. The SDSR also concluded that the remainder of the Navy's future frigate requirement would be better met by a new class of lighter, flexible, general purpose frigates.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4640
- Joined: 01 May 2015, 10:22
Re: UK's Future T26 Frigate.
she won't back down mark it would be political suicide for hermarktigger wrote:will anything be resolved over the T26 until sturgeon backs down?
- cockneyjock1974
- Member
- Posts: 537
- Joined: 01 May 2015, 09:43
Re: UK's Future T26 Frigate.
My guess is that the current(?) meeting between May and Sturgeon will see a T26 order pretty soon as a sign of May's good intent.FuNsTeR wrote:she won't back down mark it would be political suicide for hermarktigger wrote:will anything be resolved over the T26 until sturgeon backs down?
The holdup has been Pinocchio George, now that he's history, the biggest obstacle is out of the way.
I got $20 on it. Any takers?