Search found 4101 matches
- 19 Jul 2023, 13:57
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: General UK Defence Discussion
- Replies: 1936
- Views: 254628
Re: General UK Defence Discussion
I wouldn’t as it’s skipped to the answer without stating the problem / requirement. Lets be honest, it isn’t a report, it’s a document in place of a report because the report would have been too politically embarrassing at the moment. The problem and requirement part is really easy. It doesn’t need...
- 19 Jul 2023, 11:14
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: General UK Defence Discussion
- Replies: 1936
- Views: 254628
Re: General UK Defence Discussion
1) Global reaction force. Clearly the LRG setup is now questionable which is pretty reprehensible for a policy document. RN needs to clarify in plain English what the overall direction of travel is now. However the Global reaction force is interesting and perhaps requires more input from RM than a ...
- 19 Jul 2023, 10:05
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19402
- Views: 9734458
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
may be because I am not a native English speaker, it's too difficult to read :D How on earth the Defence Sec thinks this is worth publishing is beyond me! Did he resign because he was forced to publish it? Why has it taken so long and caused so much acrimony between the cabinet office and the MoD i...
- 18 Jul 2023, 22:30
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19402
- Views: 9734458
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
Just for comparison, this is how it should be written.
https://researchbriefings.files.parliam ... P98-91.pdf
That is if you actually want anyone to fully understand it.
https://researchbriefings.files.parliam ... P98-91.pdf
That is if you actually want anyone to fully understand it.
- 18 Jul 2023, 22:26
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19402
- Views: 9734458
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
This Indo-Pacific part of the DCPR is particularly underwhelming: 25. We support the vision for a free and open Indo-Pacific, in line with our values and the values of many of our partners, and our position as a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council. The ‘tilt’ to the Indo- Pacific...
- 18 Jul 2023, 21:37
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: General UK Defence Discussion
- Replies: 1936
- Views: 254628
Re: General UK Defence Discussion
That maybe how you wish to define a real terms cut but it’s not how it’s defined as defence inflation is not measured or used as national inflation indicator. How is that relevant? A reduction in spending power due to a rise in inflation is a cut in real terms if the budget is not compensated by an...
- 18 Jul 2023, 20:40
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: General UK Defence Discussion
- Replies: 1936
- Views: 254628
Re: General UK Defence Discussion
I’m not sure the budget has been cut in real terms but that real terms increase may still buy less. What is year on year Defense inflation running at? It could be as high as 10-12%. If the budget is not keeping pace with this then it’s a real terms cut. The pound strengthening against the dollar is...
- 18 Jul 2023, 19:51
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19402
- Views: 9734458
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
Not so exciting nor pressing? If I had to sum it up in a couple of sentences they would be: We asked the Treasury for more money and they said no so we have nothing to refresh and therefore this document is a complete waste of time. All outstanding issues still unresolved but due to the general ele...
- 18 Jul 2023, 19:44
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: General UK Defence Discussion
- Replies: 1936
- Views: 254628
Re: General UK Defence Discussion
Vague drivel written by committee in the hope no one reads it. Long gone are reviews that set out prioritise, the force structure required to meet those priorities and by when so the government of the day can be held account accordingly. I agree clear as mud but dumb thing for me is we don't even h...
- 18 Jul 2023, 14:52
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: General UK Defence Discussion
- Replies: 1936
- Views: 254628
- 18 Jul 2023, 14:51
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19402
- Views: 9734458
- 18 Jul 2023, 11:36
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: SSN-AUKUS Future Astute Replacement (2030s) (RN) [News Only]
- Replies: 249
- Views: 92391
Re: SSN-AUKUS Future Astute Replacement (2030s) (RN) [News Only]
Forward deploying to Perth sounds good, but spreading a small fleet even thinner. There's a lot of value pushing the drone sub development to try and pad out the small submarine fleet the Navy will have in the North Atlantic. And if that is XLUUV or even XXLUUV will these be operated by LRG(S) or a...
- 18 Jul 2023, 08:54
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]
- Replies: 8490
- Views: 2198444
Re: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]
- Interesting is the sonar is "BlueHunter (or KINGKLIP Mk2) hull sonar" and "CAPTAS-2" (not 4) VDS-TASS. IMO this is the most interesting takeaway. If the lack of a sonar capability on the T31 is going to be solved with a modular system as hoped by many, 2087 was never going to ...
- 18 Jul 2023, 08:49
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]
- Replies: 8490
- Views: 2198444
Re: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]
For me what would be a good out come would be to hulls 1 & 2 with 24 to 30 CAMM and 8 x NSM then start fitting Mk-41 from hull 3 on then at the first 5 year refit fit Mk-41 to hulls 1 & 2 If this isn’t current planning then it probably should be current planning. It’s time to maximise the T...
- 17 Jul 2023, 13:57
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]
- Replies: 8490
- Views: 2198444
- 17 Jul 2023, 11:46
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: SSN-AUKUS Future Astute Replacement (2030s) (RN) [News Only]
- Replies: 249
- Views: 92391
Re: SSN-AUKUS Future Astute Replacement (2030s) (RN) [News Only]
Construction to start at Barrow in 2027/2028.
- 16 Jul 2023, 17:52
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: General UK Defence Discussion
- Replies: 1936
- Views: 254628
- 16 Jul 2023, 11:40
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: General UK Defence Discussion
- Replies: 1936
- Views: 254628
Re: General UK Defence Discussion
What has NATO got to do with a conflict in the Indo Pacific? If NATO expands too far its effectiveness will decrease. Many euro countries will not send forces into a conflict outside of Europe. The alliance will crumble if the politicians try it. An ISAF/NATO Afghan structure won’t work in the Indo ...
- 15 Jul 2023, 21:04
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: General UK Defence Discussion
- Replies: 1936
- Views: 254628
Re: General UK Defence Discussion
DS to resign. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2023/07/15/ben-wallace-to-resign-defence-secretary-general-election/ Reading between the lines sounds like he tried to squeeze as much money as he could out of HMT but the funding envelope is now sealed. Staggering for the DS to predict the UK will ...
- 15 Jul 2023, 20:38
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
- Replies: 6171
- Views: 1867980
Re: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
Thank you.
Very Interesting design.
- 15 Jul 2023, 16:51
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
- Replies: 6171
- Views: 1867980
Re: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
Do you have any info on the hanger dimensions?
- 15 Jul 2023, 09:19
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
- Replies: 6171
- Views: 1867980
Re: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
Joint venture with the Marinha Portuguesa? To enable this the following specific capabilities would be required. - accommodation 200 mission specific crew - hangar for 2-3 Merlin sized helicopters / UAVs - flight deck with two helo landing spots and short runway / ramp for STOL UAVs - T26 sized mis...
- 15 Jul 2023, 01:25
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
- Replies: 6171
- Views: 1867980
Re: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
What could RN get for £0.5bn if bought an off the shelf amphib design? Could we get something smaller than Mistral, possibly closer in length and displacement to Osumi? Why £500m? Six MRSS will cost at least £2.4bn if constructed in the UK. Especially if it’s a new design. Added to that is the T32 ...
- 14 Jul 2023, 21:40
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
- Replies: 6171
- Views: 1867980
Re: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
Apache? Are they stealthy enough for all FCF deployments? Does deck launched HIMARS have a role? Also, I think, Osumi class like vessel modified with her bridge and funnel further shifted to starboard may well operate MALE drones. But MALE must prove their capability before discussing this. Luckily...
- 14 Jul 2023, 13:06
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
- Replies: 6171
- Views: 1867980
Re: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
...The Navy needs the amphibious ship's to balance the carriers effect. Simple operations, that can maintain lots of days at sea and be dispersed globally. They need to be what the River class are to the Destroyers. In that case, the Amphibious ship must be a Bay at most, or even smaller (like Osum...