Search found 6427 matches
- 06 Dec 2023, 10:14
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19404
- Views: 9756920
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
The issue with going this way for the T83 is you run the real risk of killing off your escort design capability and we can see this in the USN, they stuck with the AB design and when time came to replace they ended up with the like if the LCS and Zumwalt neither much good and in the end had to buy ...
- 05 Dec 2023, 13:30
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19404
- Views: 9756920
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
Is that confirmed?
If Westminster goes, the ASW skills and equipment should be transferred to one of the upgraded GP variants. Keeping 8 sub hunting frigates going should be essential, and if it means cannibalising the others then so be it! It's a sad state when 8 frigates sounds ambitious...
If Westminster goes, the ASW skills and equipment should be transferred to one of the upgraded GP variants. Keeping 8 sub hunting frigates going should be essential, and if it means cannibalising the others then so be it! It's a sad state when 8 frigates sounds ambitious...
- 05 Dec 2023, 11:04
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19404
- Views: 9756920
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
What reduction?donald_of_tokyo wrote: ↑04 Dec 2023, 23:03 Independently, reduction in ASW frigates’ number must be compensated until all T26 comes in.
- 04 Dec 2023, 12:04
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
- Replies: 6182
- Views: 1876925
- 04 Dec 2023, 11:55
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: River Class (OPV) (RN)
- Replies: 5492
- Views: 1566292
Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)
The B1's don't need replacing, and the Royal Navy does not need a 110m OPV.
The B2's are imperfect, but they are good enough, and there's no value throwing good money at a problem that doesn't need fixing.
The B2's are imperfect, but they are good enough, and there's no value throwing good money at a problem that doesn't need fixing.
- 04 Dec 2023, 11:45
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19404
- Views: 9756920
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
We all know the answer right? Delaying investment decisions and racking up huge maintenance bills, which delays investment even further. It's how the entire country is being run!
- 24 Nov 2023, 15:54
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
- Replies: 6182
- Views: 1876925
Re: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
The Royal Navy should definitely "go there", but not "on as many vessels as possible" as previously advised.
- 24 Nov 2023, 13:21
- Forum: Defence Elsewhere
- Topic: Australian Defence Force
- Replies: 2630
- Views: 755480
Re: Type 26 Frigate (City Class) (RN) [News Only]
I didn't know BAE has increased the beam for the Australians. Turns out is not jut the UK MOD that buys standard stuff and the buggers with it!
- 24 Nov 2023, 11:28
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
- Replies: 6182
- Views: 1876925
Re: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
Why? Compared to a F35 the complexity is of different magnitude. Mojave can be shipped in a crate and operated from austere airstrips. A large but modestly equipped flattop would be more than good enough. Protector needs everything an F35 needs to operate, the pilot is just somewhere else. Austere ...
- 24 Nov 2023, 08:57
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
- Replies: 6182
- Views: 1876925
Re: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
Once the potential of MALE STOL drones is fully understood it will be a high priority to get them on as many vessels as possible. The utility of organic Naval aviation has been understood for decades. Crew or no crew onboard this does no change. The limiting factor is how expensive it is. Operating...
- 24 Nov 2023, 08:50
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
- Replies: 6182
- Views: 1876925
Re: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
At 100m it's a wired hybrid between an OPV and LPH. Does this make the Portuguese the first to commit to a drone carrier? Will be an interesting one to watch.
- 23 Nov 2023, 11:56
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
- Replies: 6182
- Views: 1876925
Re: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
Transit range from one continent to another is totally irrelevant as it’s completely impractical to rely on drones from the other side of the world that may need to be rapidly replaced. This class of drone tends to be collapsible so it can be airfreighted anywhere around the world, arguably faster ...
- 19 Nov 2023, 17:07
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19404
- Views: 9756920
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
The above is what the B2s should have been. Unfortunately that's not what got built, and the time has now passed, with Royal Navy making the most out of the OPVs they have. Into the future, MHPC does not exist anymore, the Navy consider part P satisfied with new OPVs, and is moving forward with the ...
- 18 Nov 2023, 23:07
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19404
- Views: 9756920
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Take the money from the MRSS programme, scrap both Albions and build and crew a third CVF On a thread full of outrageous takes, this is the most wild! Cool idea, but seems impossible to realize. My hot-take/fantasy-fleet is for Navy that's actually operational, and can send the ships it has to se...
- 18 Nov 2023, 22:59
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19404
- Views: 9756920
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
Patrolling and ISTAR for the UK Home Waters EEZ will need a mixture of smaller OPV's, landbased P8 Poseidons and Protector MALE drones, Yep Only aircraft can generate the coverage, plus a couple of boats for when enforcement is needed In terms of ocean going OPV's, I don't think we need more than c...
- 18 Nov 2023, 14:18
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
- Replies: 15455
- Views: 4473894
Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
Probably an unpopular opinion; cats and traps is an unhelpful distraction from developing the carriers
- 18 Nov 2023, 11:23
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19404
- Views: 9756920
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
Why do the B1s need replacing?
Isn't is better to let them go and shift the crew to the T31?
Isn't is better to let them go and shift the crew to the T31?
- 18 Nov 2023, 11:20
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Wave Class Tanker (RFA)
- Replies: 208
- Views: 126257
Re: Wave Class Tanker (RFA)
The singletons should not be putting much demand on the tanker fleet apart from training in UK waters. It voids the whole concept of a simple and lean manned T31 if it needs a whole other ship to follow it around. The Royal Navy is transitioning away from standing commitments with singleton gun ship...
- 18 Nov 2023, 11:07
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19404
- Views: 9756920
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
I think we could build a 110 by 16 meter ship built to OPV standards But why? The Rivers are imperfect, but good enough and do not need replacing. They are doing a good job for the policing and engagement missions. Corvette type ships do nothing to address the escort gap either, instead they need e...
- 18 Nov 2023, 10:58
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Wave Class Tanker (RFA)
- Replies: 208
- Views: 126257
Re: Wave Class Tanker (RFA)
I'd make that a Norwegian style Aegir-18R if possible. Whatever MRSS eventually brings is going to need sustaining and the FSS is carrier focused. This is a good idea for a tide batch 2, and more valuable than keeping the Waves mothballed untill eventually sold. Better to sell now and move forward!...
- 17 Nov 2023, 16:25
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19404
- Views: 9756920
- 17 Nov 2023, 12:56
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
- Replies: 15455
- Views: 4473894
Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
Correct, a long way to go from demonstration to deployment, but cool nonetheless.
- 17 Nov 2023, 12:53
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19404
- Views: 9756920
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
The Navy is paying £400m for each T31. This is published MOD data.
- 17 Nov 2023, 10:32
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: River Class (OPV) (RN)
- Replies: 5492
- Views: 1566292
Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)
it is it's operating cost and more importantly than that availability. The more complex and more maintenance intensive the lower it's value as an asset compared to a normal escort. This is the entire value of the River class. The procurement of the OPVs was a disaster, but by chance of Frigate and ...
- 17 Nov 2023, 10:23
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19404
- Views: 9756920
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
The Meteoro-class (BAM) is the right type of small ship for an oceanic fleet like the Royal Navy. I didn't know the Spanish were building more so that's cool! Also for the "pie in the sky costing", consider that Spanish state owned enterprises are not comparable to UK private yards. Hilari...