The danish ship did shoot down 4 drones so..
There not the only ones needing to make software changes based on the real world experience
https://whro.org/news/local-news/45582- ... he-red-sea
Search found 5791 matches
- 03 Apr 2024, 15:45
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]
- Replies: 8490
- Views: 2193404
- 03 Apr 2024, 15:38
- Forum: Royal Air Force
- Topic: Post-war British Aviation - [Fantasy and Speculation]
- Replies: 32
- Views: 2911
Re: Post-war British Aviation - [Fantasy and Speculation]
The decision to delete sea harrier was in 2005 and implemented in 2006 so long gone by sdsr 2010. So that tweet is conflating several things. The real question is should fa2 sea harrier ever been started. They should have gone for the av8b with the blue vixen radar and used it both in the RN and th...
- 03 Apr 2024, 15:27
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
- Replies: 6137
- Views: 1862773
Re: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
It’s not about moving a dial it’s about being there. If there is say 2000 uk soldiers on Estonias border and they are killed by a Russian attack the reckoning is that would cause a full response and they know Russia knows that too. The British Army isn’t big enough anymore to knowingly sacrifice 20...
- 03 Apr 2024, 09:31
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
- Replies: 6137
- Views: 1862773
Re: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
So not the JEF region after all just the bits that best suit the narrative. Not at all. It’s the entire JEF area. In the same way that UK Battlegroups in Denmark and the Netherlands would be pointless is a single UK Battlegroup in Estonia going to move the dial? Deploying 2 or 3 rapid reaction Brig...
- 03 Apr 2024, 09:22
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19387
- Views: 9717195
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
The global meltdown that will ensue if we give the CCP control of 80% of the microchips on which our economy is dependent would be far worse. Frankly it would be the end of the western world as we know it. From that point on Japan would be effectively Finlandised and Australia would be next - with ...
- 02 Apr 2024, 23:04
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
- Replies: 6137
- Views: 1862773
Re: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
OK 3 Cdo and 29 RA Cdo could do with few GBAD Vikings No argument. My point is: If the Army is concentrating of the JEF region and leaving the large land armies to continental Europe, how many Vikings will the British Army need? 5 of the JEF nations are in continental Europe. I know but deploying B...
- 02 Apr 2024, 22:58
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19387
- Views: 9717195
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
The global meltdown that will ensue if we give the CCP control of 80% of the microchips on which our economy is dependent would be far worse. Frankly it would be the end of the western world as we know it. From that point on Japan would be effectively Finlandised and Australia would be next - with ...
- 02 Apr 2024, 22:19
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19387
- Views: 9717195
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
Which is why if indications of conflict started to appear and you were serious about stopping it you rapidly start streaming in stand in forces, think desert shield. With the very clear signal if you are coming in, you are coming in on us with all the implications of where that ends. It’s the clear ...
- 02 Apr 2024, 22:14
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
- Replies: 6137
- Views: 1862773
Re: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
5 of the JEF nations are in continental Europe.Poiuytrewq wrote: ↑02 Apr 2024, 21:34No argument.
My point is: If the Army is concentrating of the JEF region and leaving the large land armies to continental Europe, how many Vikings will the British Army need?
- 02 Apr 2024, 17:59
- Forum: Royal Air Force
- Topic: Post-war British Aviation - [Fantasy and Speculation]
- Replies: 32
- Views: 2911
Re: Post-war British Aviation - [Fantasy and Speculation]
The decision to delete sea harrier was in 2005 and implemented in 2006 so long gone by sdsr 2010. So that tweet is conflating several things. The real question is should fa2 sea harrier ever been started. They should have gone for the av8b with the blue vixen radar and used it both in the RN and the...
- 02 Apr 2024, 16:26
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]
- Replies: 8490
- Views: 2193404
Re: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]
Probably more appropriate in the Red Sea or Danish military thread than here. Sounds like the issues were known about for some considerable time.
- 01 Apr 2024, 22:55
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19387
- Views: 9717195
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
I dont think there is any realistic scenario where Russian military assets start attacking merchant shipping heading to western nato nations. There maybe intimidation like we are seeing in the Philippine sea from China at the minute. There maybe interference with navigation systems as we have seen ...
- 01 Apr 2024, 17:16
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19387
- Views: 9717195
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
How many modern subs do Russia have in their northern fleet? Somewhere between 12 & 15 - enough to keep a large submarine and surface fleet busy. We ie nato have more than that even the European nato nations do would they not be keeping the Russian fleet busy? If the scenario is that they are a...
- 01 Apr 2024, 15:17
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19387
- Views: 9717195
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
We ie nato have more than that even the European nato nations do would they not be keeping the Russian fleet busy?
- 01 Apr 2024, 15:09
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19387
- Views: 9717195
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
Are we the west likely to engage Chinese forces directly anymore than we are engaging Russian forces directly in Ukraine? No, we (the UK) aren’t, but the US in Taiwan is quite possible which then draws in regional players. If the answer is no then should Chinese forces surround Taiwan there would b...
- 01 Apr 2024, 13:36
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19387
- Views: 9717195
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
Thanks for your thoughts on the five year RN surface fleet priorities / tweaks given the realistic (IMO) China invasion of Taiwan scenario with Russia supporting by using its navy to threat and disrupt the NATO region in parallel. I’ve been thinking about it over the break also, and what strikes me...
- 01 Apr 2024, 13:23
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19387
- Views: 9717195
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
Just to put this into Context NATO Europe not including the USN & Canada has 3 x Fleet Carriers 1 x Light Carrier 6 x LHD's ( 3 fixed wing capable 1 x F35 , 2 x Harrier ) 7 x SSBN's 13 x SSN's 53 x SSK 127 x escorts 80 x Corvettes / OPV's 50+ MPA How many of the 127 Escorts have a capability to...
- 31 Mar 2024, 20:53
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: General UK Defence Discussion
- Replies: 1909
- Views: 253337
Re: General UK Defence Discussion
That’s one way to look at it and you raise valid points. The other way to look at it is to say that defence is being run too hot and there is virtually no excess to allow for a realistic rate of attrition in a conflict. Continuously running hot fleets is a peacetime luxury that goes out of date as ...
- 31 Mar 2024, 19:20
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: General UK Defence Discussion
- Replies: 1909
- Views: 253337
Re: General UK Defence Discussion
Just sounds like a fantasy shopping list to me tbh Looks like a solid grasp of the priorities to me. Interesting how the RAF didn’t get much of a mention. Why are our current 7 ssns not getting to sea much, why are the ssbn patrol lengths getting longer. It’s not because we didn’t order 12 ssns. Wh...
- 31 Mar 2024, 18:49
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: General UK Defence Discussion
- Replies: 1909
- Views: 253337
Re: General UK Defence Discussion
Just sounds like a fantasy shopping list to me tbhPoiuytrewq wrote: ↑31 Mar 2024, 16:47I think the short answer is, yes, absolutely it really would be sensible.
It’s just time to fund it and do it now.
- 31 Mar 2024, 12:50
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
- Replies: 6137
- Views: 1862773
Re: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
Indeed because the vehicle you posted an image off has a gross vehicle weight limit which is less that the weight which can be lifted by chinook. So you are still missing the point. So regardless of what configuration it is(gun, cab whatever) it should still be lift able by chinook. Somehow I doubt...
- 31 Mar 2024, 12:28
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
- Replies: 6137
- Views: 1862773
Re: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
Indeed because the vehicle you posted an image off has a gross vehicle weight limit which is less that the weight which can be lifted by chinook. So you are still missing the point. So regardless of what configuration it is(gun, cab whatever) it should still be lift able by chinook. Somehow I doubt...
- 31 Mar 2024, 12:27
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
- Replies: 6137
- Views: 1862773
Re: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
Indeed because the vehicle you posted an image off has a gross vehicle weight limit which is less that the weight which can be lifted by chinook. So you are still missing the point. So regardless of what configuration it is(gun, cab whatever) it should still be lift able by chinook. Somehow I doubt...
- 31 Mar 2024, 11:17
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: General UK Defence Discussion
- Replies: 1909
- Views: 253337
Re: General UK Defence Discussion
Extremely illuminating. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-13254155/JAMES-HEAPPEY-spend-three-cent-GDP-Armed-Forces.html • Grant Shapps was offered 2.5% GDP in a decades time! Effectively 3 parliaments away. • Heappey proposing increase to 2.5% by NATO 75 summit in July. • Heappey proposing...
- 31 Mar 2024, 11:05
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
- Replies: 6137
- Views: 1862773
Re: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
I have no idea what your point is. Yes, that was obvious from your previous post. Indeed because the vehicle you posted an image off has a gross vehicle weight limit which is less that the weight which can be lifted by chinook. So regardless of what configuration it is(gun, cab whatever) it should ...