Search found 1477 matches
- 30 Dec 2023, 11:03
- Forum: Conflicts
- Topic: The war in Ukraine
- Replies: 1164
- Views: 95133
Re: The war in Ukraine
I’ve seem articles suggesting that the greater threat to Ukrainian aircraft is the MiG 31 with the R37 missiles
- 23 Dec 2023, 11:05
- Forum: British Army
- Topic: RBSL Challenger 3 (Future) Main Battle Tank (British Army)
- Replies: 357
- Views: 75319
Re: RBSL Challenger 3 (Future) Main Battle Tank (British Army)
Good to hear things are moving forwards, but those are some very expensive lights.
Tens of thousands per vehicle?
Tens of thousands per vehicle?
- 10 Dec 2023, 12:30
- Forum: Joint Service
- Topic: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)
- Replies: 6095
- Views: 1753501
Re: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)
If true IMHO that’s good more aircraft for the £ current F35B should be navy owned and operated but maintenance costs shared between RAF/RN I'd expect any cost savings in the purchase to be eaten up by running two* maintenance/training pipelines, plus it provides a wedge between disparate forces fo...
- 05 Dec 2023, 18:53
- Forum: UK Defence & Aerospace Industry
- Topic: Hill Helicopters
- Replies: 12
- Views: 3222
Re: Hill Helicopters
Given the last two Starship launches, one hopes not.Could this company shake up the GA sector in the same way SpaceX has disrupted the launch market?
- 22 Nov 2023, 20:53
- Forum: British Army
- Topic: Warrior Armoured Vehicles (British Army)
- Replies: 1041
- Views: 325910
Re: Warrior Armoured Vehicles (British Army)
Boxer is modular at the mission module, so you'd have to "simply fit" the IFV mission module.mrclark303 wrote: ↑22 Nov 2023, 16:26 Did we do the "UK thing" and specially bespoke modify ours, so we can't simply fit the turret systems already developed, I wouldn't put it past the MOD....
- 12 Nov 2023, 14:31
- Forum: British Army
- Topic: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments
- Replies: 865
- Views: 319423
Re: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments
If we had more Artillery regiments great and maybe Hero 120 is to much and just sticking to 120mm and brimstone is enough for Battalion battle groups as brimstone allows targets out 20km's to be hit if needed That's the thing. If we've got resources to create weapons companies armed as such in each...
- 12 Nov 2023, 13:11
- Forum: British Army
- Topic: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments
- Replies: 865
- Views: 319423
Re: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments
For me Brimstone is a weapon that is key I would if money allowed also drop in a lortor weapon section within the maneuver group for what i would call (for want of better name) the Infantry deep fight which I would mark at 45Km's from the firing point. The main combat area would be 0 to 10 km's wit...
- 11 Nov 2023, 18:37
- Forum: British Army
- Topic: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments
- Replies: 865
- Views: 319423
Re: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments
As I said before for me I would change the infantry Battalion maneuver group to have a 120mm mortar platoon and a Brimstone overwatch platoon and then give each rifle company 2 x 60mm mortars this would allow the infantry to fight from 100 meters to 30 Km's in turn allowing the Artillery to get on ...
- 11 Nov 2023, 18:11
- Forum: British Army
- Topic: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments
- Replies: 865
- Views: 319423
Re: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments
Um no, you've made the comparison. I told you the range of 120mm Mortar in relation to MA requirements... It's the great thing about forums, read back... You brought up the range for both, giving an assisted range for one and a unassisted one for the other. If you didn't mean for that to be a compa...
- 11 Nov 2023, 17:24
- Forum: British Army
- Topic: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments
- Replies: 865
- Views: 319423
Re: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments
Base bleed range isn't a free lunch. So... You're not comparing like with like then. Why not!? Rocket assist (12km) vs base bleed (20km) or plain ballistic (8km) vs plain ballistic (17km). You're the one comparing rocket assist with plain. Good thing it's not intended to out-range a light gun then....
- 11 Nov 2023, 16:40
- Forum: British Army
- Topic: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments
- Replies: 865
- Views: 319423
Re: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments
L118 doesn't hit 21km. Not with regular ammunition, but the base-bleed ER shell would go over 20km (wiki cites 20.6km, Janes "over 20km") Maybe not quite 21km, but still, compare like with like. 120mm mortar is helicopter carried. And has about half the range of the light gun. Did I sugge...
- 11 Nov 2023, 15:22
- Forum: British Army
- Topic: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments
- Replies: 865
- Views: 319423
Re: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments
Why is it useful for light forces? Wtf has a helicopter and tank got to do with it. Because it's airportable and has a decent range. A helicopter can be used for jobs a tank does, but if you put one in place of the other neither will fare very well. Different systems for different jobs. Can you get...
- 10 Nov 2023, 23:31
- Forum: British Army
- Topic: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments
- Replies: 865
- Views: 319423
Re: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments
No suggestions of making the RA smaller, or giving MA the light gun. Bin light gun entirely. When I said resources, I meant money and personnel. If you bin the light gun, what are you doing with the money and personnel? Re-equipping with the long range guns and missiles? Personally, I think that th...
- 10 Nov 2023, 14:55
- Forum: British Army
- Topic: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments
- Replies: 865
- Views: 319423
Re: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments
Manoeuvre Arm. That'll be the infantry/armour that the artillery are operating in support of. Thank you. - Remove close support from RA. Give 120mm mortars to MA Seems like a strange way of presenting it. Would the 120mm mortars be in addition to the 81mm mortars at battalion or in addition? What w...
- 10 Nov 2023, 12:31
- Forum: British Army
- Topic: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments
- Replies: 865
- Views: 319423
Re: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments
RA = Royal Artillery, MA = ?
- 04 Nov 2023, 16:52
- Forum: British Army
- Topic: Ajax Armoured Vehicles (British Army)
- Replies: 2432
- Views: 536571
Re: Ajax Armoured Vehicles (British Army)
The same MCS is currently in use in Ukraine on the CV9040s from Sweden, so there ought to be excellent evidence on how it stands up to operational use. No harm in further testing though. As an applique system it offers the ability to alter the performance between testing, exercises and operational u...
- 04 Nov 2023, 12:12
- Forum: Royal Air Force
- Topic: Future UK Combat Aircraft (Project Tempest)
- Replies: 4067
- Views: 978859
- 28 Oct 2023, 19:41
- Forum: British Army
- Topic: Ajax Armoured Vehicles (British Army)
- Replies: 2432
- Views: 536571
Re: Ajax Armoured Vehicles (British Army)
I'm sorry, but this is exactly the opposite of recognised Cost Accounting / Project Accounting. The fact that 2/3 of the budget has been spent does not mean 2/3 of the milestones have been achieved. No, it doesn't. Why would it? I didn't say that it did. 44 complete vehicles have been handed over -...
- 27 Oct 2023, 20:18
- Forum: British Army
- Topic: Section Infantry Weapons
- Replies: 1492
- Views: 441266
Re: Section Infantry Weapons
Having to choose bayonet or suppressor is a bit sucky. Anything hanging off the hand guard would have to be kind of long and awkward.
- 27 Oct 2023, 19:20
- Forum: British Army
- Topic: Ajax Armoured Vehicles (British Army)
- Replies: 2432
- Views: 536571
Re: Ajax Armoured Vehicles (British Army)
I don't know - ask the market. It's called a "tender". Do you know how much a "tender" costs? How long it takes? Do you cancel Ajax before you do it in the hope that it gives you a good answer, or do you let Ajax stumble on with the axe hanging over it? Personal view - Ajax has ...
- 27 Oct 2023, 15:06
- Forum: British Army
- Topic: Ajax Armoured Vehicles (British Army)
- Replies: 2432
- Views: 536571
Re: Ajax Armoured Vehicles (British Army)
Moved here to be on topic And if there really is a unique UK need for gold plated electronics then it should have been modularised and separated from the platform. By making it bespoke and platform specific you're basically allowing GD to milk us for the next 30 years. Isn't Ajax supposed to be GVA ...
- 27 Oct 2023, 12:05
- Forum: British Army
- Topic: Apache Attack Helicopter (British Army Air Corps)
- Replies: 612
- Views: 213539
Re: Apache Attack Helicopter (British Army Air Corps)
And if there really is a unique UK need for gold plated electronics then it should have been modularised and separated from the platform. By making it bespoke and platform specific you're basically allowing GD to milk us for the next 30 years. Isn't Ajax supposed to be GVA compliant? So the electro...
- 07 Oct 2023, 21:40
- Forum: British Army
- Topic: Section Infantry Weapons
- Replies: 1492
- Views: 441266
Re: Section Infantry Weapons
...very good...
- 05 Oct 2023, 23:20
- Forum: British Army
- Topic: Ground Based Air Defence
- Replies: 695
- Views: 194813
- 04 Oct 2023, 19:00
- Forum: British Army
- Topic: Section Infantry Weapons
- Replies: 1492
- Views: 441266
Re: Section Infantry Weapons
Wasn't that the rifle that got lots of US soldiers killed in Vietnam with stoppages and failures?mrclark303 wrote: ↑04 Oct 2023, 18:47 We could have simply licence manufactured M16A2's, with the crap three round burst replaced with the A1's simple select fire mechanism.