Search found 1477 matches

by mr.fred
30 Dec 2023, 11:03
Forum: Conflicts
Topic: The war in Ukraine
Replies: 1164
Views: 95133
United Kingdom

Re: The war in Ukraine

I’ve seem articles suggesting that the greater threat to Ukrainian aircraft is the MiG 31 with the R37 missiles
by mr.fred
23 Dec 2023, 11:05
Forum: British Army
Topic: RBSL Challenger 3 (Future) Main Battle Tank (British Army)
Replies: 357
Views: 75319
United Kingdom

Re: RBSL Challenger 3 (Future) Main Battle Tank (British Army)

Good to hear things are moving forwards, but those are some very expensive lights.
Tens of thousands per vehicle?
by mr.fred
10 Dec 2023, 12:30
Forum: Joint Service
Topic: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)
Replies: 6095
Views: 1753501
United Kingdom

Re: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)

If true IMHO that’s good more aircraft for the £ current F35B should be navy owned and operated but maintenance costs shared between RAF/RN I'd expect any cost savings in the purchase to be eaten up by running two* maintenance/training pipelines, plus it provides a wedge between disparate forces fo...
by mr.fred
05 Dec 2023, 18:53
Forum: UK Defence & Aerospace Industry
Topic: Hill Helicopters
Replies: 12
Views: 3222
United Kingdom

Re: Hill Helicopters

Could this company shake up the GA sector in the same way SpaceX has disrupted the launch market?
Given the last two Starship launches, one hopes not.
by mr.fred
22 Nov 2023, 20:53
Forum: British Army
Topic: Warrior Armoured Vehicles (British Army)
Replies: 1041
Views: 325910
United Kingdom

Re: Warrior Armoured Vehicles (British Army)

mrclark303 wrote: 22 Nov 2023, 16:26 Did we do the "UK thing" and specially bespoke modify ours, so we can't simply fit the turret systems already developed, I wouldn't put it past the MOD....
Boxer is modular at the mission module, so you'd have to "simply fit" the IFV mission module.
by mr.fred
12 Nov 2023, 14:31
Forum: British Army
Topic: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments
Replies: 865
Views: 319423
United Kingdom

Re: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments

If we had more Artillery regiments great and maybe Hero 120 is to much and just sticking to 120mm and brimstone is enough for Battalion battle groups as brimstone allows targets out 20km's to be hit if needed That's the thing. If we've got resources to create weapons companies armed as such in each...
by mr.fred
12 Nov 2023, 13:11
Forum: British Army
Topic: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments
Replies: 865
Views: 319423
United Kingdom

Re: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments

For me Brimstone is a weapon that is key I would if money allowed also drop in a lortor weapon section within the maneuver group for what i would call (for want of better name) the Infantry deep fight which I would mark at 45Km's from the firing point. The main combat area would be 0 to 10 km's wit...
by mr.fred
11 Nov 2023, 18:37
Forum: British Army
Topic: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments
Replies: 865
Views: 319423
United Kingdom

Re: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments

As I said before for me I would change the infantry Battalion maneuver group to have a 120mm mortar platoon and a Brimstone overwatch platoon and then give each rifle company 2 x 60mm mortars this would allow the infantry to fight from 100 meters to 30 Km's in turn allowing the Artillery to get on ...
by mr.fred
11 Nov 2023, 18:11
Forum: British Army
Topic: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments
Replies: 865
Views: 319423
United Kingdom

Re: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments

Um no, you've made the comparison. I told you the range of 120mm Mortar in relation to MA requirements... It's the great thing about forums, read back... You brought up the range for both, giving an assisted range for one and a unassisted one for the other. If you didn't mean for that to be a compa...
by mr.fred
11 Nov 2023, 17:24
Forum: British Army
Topic: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments
Replies: 865
Views: 319423
United Kingdom

Re: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments

Base bleed range isn't a free lunch. So... You're not comparing like with like then. Why not!? Rocket assist (12km) vs base bleed (20km) or plain ballistic (8km) vs plain ballistic (17km). You're the one comparing rocket assist with plain. Good thing it's not intended to out-range a light gun then....
by mr.fred
11 Nov 2023, 16:40
Forum: British Army
Topic: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments
Replies: 865
Views: 319423
United Kingdom

Re: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments

L118 doesn't hit 21km. Not with regular ammunition, but the base-bleed ER shell would go over 20km (wiki cites 20.6km, Janes "over 20km") Maybe not quite 21km, but still, compare like with like. 120mm mortar is helicopter carried. And has about half the range of the light gun. Did I sugge...
by mr.fred
11 Nov 2023, 15:22
Forum: British Army
Topic: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments
Replies: 865
Views: 319423
United Kingdom

Re: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments

Why is it useful for light forces? Wtf has a helicopter and tank got to do with it. Because it's airportable and has a decent range. A helicopter can be used for jobs a tank does, but if you put one in place of the other neither will fare very well. Different systems for different jobs. Can you get...
by mr.fred
10 Nov 2023, 23:31
Forum: British Army
Topic: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments
Replies: 865
Views: 319423
United Kingdom

Re: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments

No suggestions of making the RA smaller, or giving MA the light gun. Bin light gun entirely. When I said resources, I meant money and personnel. If you bin the light gun, what are you doing with the money and personnel? Re-equipping with the long range guns and missiles? Personally, I think that th...
by mr.fred
10 Nov 2023, 14:55
Forum: British Army
Topic: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments
Replies: 865
Views: 319423
United Kingdom

Re: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments

Manoeuvre Arm. That'll be the infantry/armour that the artillery are operating in support of. Thank you. - Remove close support from RA. Give 120mm mortars to MA Seems like a strange way of presenting it. Would the 120mm mortars be in addition to the 81mm mortars at battalion or in addition? What w...
by mr.fred
10 Nov 2023, 12:31
Forum: British Army
Topic: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments
Replies: 865
Views: 319423
United Kingdom

Re: Royal Artillery/Royal Horse Artillery future developments

RunningStrong wrote: 09 Nov 2023, 22:44 - Remove close support from RA. Give 120mm mortars to MA
RA = Royal Artillery, MA = ?
by mr.fred
04 Nov 2023, 16:52
Forum: British Army
Topic: Ajax Armoured Vehicles (British Army)
Replies: 2432
Views: 536571
United Kingdom

Re: Ajax Armoured Vehicles (British Army)

The same MCS is currently in use in Ukraine on the CV9040s from Sweden, so there ought to be excellent evidence on how it stands up to operational use. No harm in further testing though. As an applique system it offers the ability to alter the performance between testing, exercises and operational u...
by mr.fred
04 Nov 2023, 12:12
Forum: Royal Air Force
Topic: Future UK Combat Aircraft (Project Tempest)
Replies: 4067
Views: 978859
United Kingdom

Re: Future UK Combat Aircraft (Project Tempest)

Spitfire9 wrote: 04 Nov 2023, 11:48 What about negotiating prices to enable companies to break even with productivity improvements
Can you expand on what you mean by that? It doesn't make sense to me.
by mr.fred
28 Oct 2023, 19:41
Forum: British Army
Topic: Ajax Armoured Vehicles (British Army)
Replies: 2432
Views: 536571
United Kingdom

Re: Ajax Armoured Vehicles (British Army)

I'm sorry, but this is exactly the opposite of recognised Cost Accounting / Project Accounting. The fact that 2/3 of the budget has been spent does not mean 2/3 of the milestones have been achieved. No, it doesn't. Why would it? I didn't say that it did. 44 complete vehicles have been handed over -...
by mr.fred
27 Oct 2023, 20:18
Forum: British Army
Topic: Section Infantry Weapons
Replies: 1492
Views: 441266
United Kingdom

Re: Section Infantry Weapons

Having to choose bayonet or suppressor is a bit sucky. Anything hanging off the hand guard would have to be kind of long and awkward.
by mr.fred
27 Oct 2023, 19:20
Forum: British Army
Topic: Ajax Armoured Vehicles (British Army)
Replies: 2432
Views: 536571
United Kingdom

Re: Ajax Armoured Vehicles (British Army)

I don't know - ask the market. It's called a "tender". Do you know how much a "tender" costs? How long it takes? Do you cancel Ajax before you do it in the hope that it gives you a good answer, or do you let Ajax stumble on with the axe hanging over it? Personal view - Ajax has ...
by mr.fred
27 Oct 2023, 15:06
Forum: British Army
Topic: Ajax Armoured Vehicles (British Army)
Replies: 2432
Views: 536571
United Kingdom

Re: Ajax Armoured Vehicles (British Army)

Moved here to be on topic And if there really is a unique UK need for gold plated electronics then it should have been modularised and separated from the platform. By making it bespoke and platform specific you're basically allowing GD to milk us for the next 30 years. Isn't Ajax supposed to be GVA ...
by mr.fred
27 Oct 2023, 12:05
Forum: British Army
Topic: Apache Attack Helicopter (British Army Air Corps)
Replies: 612
Views: 213539
United Kingdom

Re: Apache Attack Helicopter (British Army Air Corps)

And if there really is a unique UK need for gold plated electronics then it should have been modularised and separated from the platform. By making it bespoke and platform specific you're basically allowing GD to milk us for the next 30 years. Isn't Ajax supposed to be GVA compliant? So the electro...
by mr.fred
07 Oct 2023, 21:40
Forum: British Army
Topic: Section Infantry Weapons
Replies: 1492
Views: 441266
United Kingdom

Re: Section Infantry Weapons

mrclark303 wrote: 07 Oct 2023, 16:48 a quiet revolution going on with moderators
...very good...
by mr.fred
05 Oct 2023, 23:20
Forum: British Army
Topic: Ground Based Air Defence
Replies: 695
Views: 194813
United Kingdom

Re: Ground Based Air Defence

new guy wrote: 05 Oct 2023, 23:02 what? you still make no sense,
you arre saying have CAMM alongside CAMM.
I think he means that we should have the Supacat (or other vehicle)-based launchers in addition to the MAN truck-based systems.
by mr.fred
04 Oct 2023, 19:00
Forum: British Army
Topic: Section Infantry Weapons
Replies: 1492
Views: 441266
United Kingdom

Re: Section Infantry Weapons

mrclark303 wrote: 04 Oct 2023, 18:47 We could have simply licence manufactured M16A2's, with the crap three round burst replaced with the A1's simple select fire mechanism.
Wasn't that the rifle that got lots of US soldiers killed in Vietnam with stoppages and failures?
;)