Search found 7317 matches

by Ron5
05 Apr 2020, 15:48
Forum: Joint Service
Topic: Joint Helicopter Force
Replies: 145
Views: 73215
United States of America

Re: Joint Helicopter Force

Does anyone happen to know why we dropped out of the NH90? The TTH (and more so the new MTT) would have been an obvious Puma replacement... And maybe if we was in, we could have fixed some of the issues early (like how stupidly low it sits)? P. S. I can guess why we didn't want the NFH... :D It was...
by Ron5
04 Apr 2020, 18:24
Forum: Joint Service
Topic: Joint Helicopter Force
Replies: 145
Views: 73215
United States of America

Re: Joint Helicopter Force

SW1 wrote:Uk government can support British industry purchasing a number of the options discussed. Airbus helicopters have facilities in oxford and Aberdeen ..
By the same flimsy argument the UK should buy Lockheed or Boeing. And get a superior product too.
by Ron5
04 Apr 2020, 18:20
Forum: Joint Service
Topic: Joint Helicopter Force
Replies: 145
Views: 73215
United States of America

Re: Joint Helicopter Force

SW1 wrote:Britain's Joint Helicopter Command wants to extend the out-of-service date of its Puma helicopter fleet to harmonize with the expected withdrawal of the Merlin, according to Maj. Gen. Richard Felton, the force's commander.
He was talking about the RAF Merlins which no longer need replacing.
by Ron5
03 Apr 2020, 21:25
Forum: Joint Service
Topic: Joint Helicopter Force
Replies: 145
Views: 73215
United States of America

Re: Joint Helicopter Force

SW1 wrote:whatever replaces puma replaces merlin
Exhibit #657: why the royal navy own their helicopters and why they should own their fast jets too.

"But Admiral, I thought Russia was our enemy?"

"No son, the RAF is our enemy, Russia is the opposition"
by Ron5
03 Apr 2020, 16:24
Forum: Joint Service
Topic: Joint Helicopter Force
Replies: 145
Views: 73215
United States of America

Re: Joint Helicopter Force

Sigh, here we go again: do we want cheap or do we want a domestic production capability? Can't have both.
by Ron5
02 Apr 2020, 17:31
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: The future form of the Army
Replies: 665
Views: 153731
United States of America

Re: The future form of the Army

Timmymagic wrote:
Ron5 wrote: Cancel MRV(P) stage 2 as that's almost certainly going to be 100% offshore build.
The answer to MRV(P) could be Supacat...you just hope someone in the MoD is listening..
Or more Boxers :D

Stripped down of course.
by Ron5
02 Apr 2020, 16:54
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: The future form of the Army
Replies: 665
Views: 153731
United States of America

Re: The future form of the Army

Is the army not looking for a Javelin replacement? thought I saw a line for that in the budget. If so, Spike has to be the hot fave. I'd have thought the MMP would be the clear pole sitter. It's made by MBDA, and they'll set up a UK line for it (like they did with Milan). Well that would be more in...
by Ron5
02 Apr 2020, 16:53
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: The future form of the Army
Replies: 665
Views: 153731
United States of America

Re: The future form of the Army

On a different note, I wonder if it would be a good idea in the aftermath of kung flu, for the MoD to prioritize spending in the UK and to re-negotiate deals to increase UK supplied content? i.e. fund UK jobs. So CR3, Boxer & Ajax over JLTV & Apache. Maybe force increase in Boxer UK content....
by Ron5
02 Apr 2020, 16:47
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: The future form of the Army
Replies: 665
Views: 153731
United States of America

Re: The future form of the Army

Is the army not looking for a Javelin replacement? thought I saw a line for that in the budget. If so, Spike has to be the hot fave.
by Ron5
02 Apr 2020, 16:00
Forum: Joint Service
Topic: Joint Helicopter Force
Replies: 145
Views: 73215
United States of America

Re: Joint Helicopter Force

Yes H145m comes from a civi background but what the AAC needs is a armed scout that can lift 8 to 10 troops when needed so why don't you give me some other types that might fit the task that are new to the market or in the pipe line and due in service in the next 5 years Is that 5 year threshold re...
by Ron5
02 Apr 2020, 04:36
Forum: Joint Service
Topic: Joint Helicopter Force
Replies: 145
Views: 73215
United States of America

Re: Joint Helicopter Force

To be more precise: a 50 year old civilian helicopter painted green that some folks here would like to see in front line combat duty.

A flying snatch landrover?
by Ron5
01 Apr 2020, 18:20
Forum: Joint Service
Topic: Joint Helicopter Force
Replies: 145
Views: 73215
United States of America

Re: Joint Helicopter Force

Basically a 50 year old design, that's the ticket.
by Ron5
31 Mar 2020, 17:37
Forum: Joint Service
Topic: Joint Helicopter Force
Replies: 145
Views: 73215
United States of America

Re: Joint Helicopter Force

The world and the bad guys don't stand still just because you might choose to. Easy to say when your armed forces have 748 billion a year to play with and until the new US program is in production it is only a wet dream for the likes of the UK forces Christ even V-22 is a wet dream right now for th...
by Ron5
31 Mar 2020, 16:13
Forum: Joint Service
Topic: Joint Helicopter Force
Replies: 145
Views: 73215
United States of America

Re: Joint Helicopter Force

Or actually go with new technology instead of just more of the same decades old designs. If you wanted to wait for newer technology the racer maybe of interest Gents I am all for an eye on the future however at this time money is the big problem that we face. For me something like H-145M would fit ...
by Ron5
31 Mar 2020, 16:06
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: The future form of the Army
Replies: 665
Views: 153731
United States of America

Re: The future form of the Army

I'm curious about the 6 mounting points instead of 4. Hopefully that doesn't mean the 4 point modules won't fit the 6 point UK chassis.
by Ron5
31 Mar 2020, 01:37
Forum: Joint Service
Topic: Joint Helicopter Force
Replies: 145
Views: 73215
United States of America

Re: Joint Helicopter Force

Somehow I don't think it will be one of these ..

Image
by Ron5
30 Mar 2020, 19:19
Forum: Joint Service
Topic: Joint Helicopter Force
Replies: 145
Views: 73215
United States of America

Re: Joint Helicopter Force

Tempest414 wrote:Maybe the Army should get rid of its Wildcats & Gazelles and replace them with 50 UH-72's would make a nice round number
Or actually go with new technology instead of just more of the same decades old designs.
by Ron5
30 Mar 2020, 16:32
Forum: Joint Service
Topic: Joint Helicopter Force
Replies: 145
Views: 73215
United States of America

Re: Joint Helicopter Force

Image
by Ron5
30 Mar 2020, 16:23
Forum: Royal Navy
Topic: Type 26 Frigate (City Class) (RN) [News Only]
Replies: 5691
Views: 1493263
United States of America

Re: Type 26 Frigate (City Class) (RN) [News Only]

https://twitter.com/NavyLookout/status/1242847914818506756 I'm guessing the German Mission Bay Handling System was part of Rolls Royce Commercial Marine, sold to Kongsberg in Apr 2019 for ~£350 million to help RR fund rectification of tech problems on their Trent engines, BBC reported RR incurred £...
by Ron5
27 Mar 2020, 22:34
Forum: Royal Navy
Topic: Future Solid Support Ship
Replies: 1972
Views: 565587
United States of America

Re: Future Solid Support Ship

They could probably be built at Cammell Lairds in Merseyside quite easily, the problem is money - the funding gap in the equipment plan plus C19 impact. I think I read CL would need a modest investment to accommodate the longer length of the FSS. The only issue might be their less than stellar reco...
by Ron5
27 Mar 2020, 18:21
Forum: Royal Navy
Topic: Future Solid Support Ship
Replies: 1972
Views: 565587
United States of America

Re: Future Solid Support Ship

abc123 wrote:next 15 T26
Good thinking.
by Ron5
27 Mar 2020, 15:10
Forum: Royal Navy
Topic: Future Solid Support Ship
Replies: 1972
Views: 565587
United States of America

Re: Future Solid Support Ship

They could probably be built at Cammell Lairds in Merseyside quite easily, the problem is money - the funding gap in the equipment plan plus C19 impact. I think I read CL would need a modest investment to accommodate the longer length of the FSS. The only issue might be their less than stellar reco...
by Ron5
27 Mar 2020, 15:06
Forum: Joint Service
Topic: Joint Helicopter Force
Replies: 145
Views: 73215
United States of America

Re: Joint Helicopter Force

Any ex-Marine Ospreys will be knackered and would need mucho dineros to get fit for RAF/RN service.

But a nice idea in theory for the QE's for long range insertion/SAR.
by Ron5
27 Mar 2020, 14:54
Forum: Royal Air Force
Topic: Eurofighter Typhoon (RAF)
Replies: 2837
Views: 780077
United States of America

Re: Eurofighter Typhoon (RAF)

A German split buy sounds a silly idea. Bet it don't happen.
by Ron5
27 Mar 2020, 14:49
Forum: Royal Air Force
Topic: Future UK Combat Aircraft (Project Tempest)
Replies: 4067
Views: 992137
United States of America

Re: Future UK Combat Aircraft (Project Tempest)

Looks like the Japanese are going on their own... Not all bad news though, they may be looking to co-operate on lots of the systems inside, which is pretty much what Tempest is about. https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-japan-defence-fighter-exclusive/exclusive-japan-favours-home-grown-design-for-nex...