Search found 271 matches
- 05 Jun 2018, 11:36
- Forum: Joint Service
- Topic: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)
- Replies: 6097
- Views: 1764840
Re: F-35B Lightning II (RN & RAF)
Quoting more from Think Defence January 2013 "It was planned to introduce a transonic and low signature optimised 426 gallon in block 4 although the U.K has not indicated if it will obtain these and the development seems uncertain in any case." "The Israelis have even proposed a larg...
- 05 Jun 2018, 07:24
- Forum: Joint Service
- Topic: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)
- Replies: 6097
- Views: 1764840
Re: F-35B Lightning II (RN & RAF)
source wiki empty weight 13154 kg loaded weight 22426 kg max take off weight 31800 kg this seems to indicate there is the ability to carry 8000kg of fuel plus other mission needs 8000lbs or kg? You’ve used both in your last two posts. That’s before US/Imperial Gallons get mixed up...... 8000lb of e...
- 30 May 2018, 18:51
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
- Replies: 15455
- Views: 4457581
Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
Shocking, the RAF must be to blame.......SKB wrote:How are they going to land F-35B on her? They took the temporary helideck off her swimming pool after the Falklands War was over in 1982.Tempest414 wrote:when QE2 goes to the US
- 27 May 2018, 15:49
- Forum: British Army
- Topic: Ground Based Air Defence
- Replies: 743
- Views: 201083
Re: Ground Based Air Defence
So why would they be testing a configuration the customer is not getting? Why not have it there? If it wasn’t used for targeting it’s presence has no effect on a firing System Test, even if it was for acceptance. MBDA could have requested to bolt it on either to gain data for future use, to showcas...
- 26 May 2018, 23:28
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
- Replies: 15455
- Views: 4457581
Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
Might need to put a bit more research in to that statement.CameronPerson wrote: But then again we’re the only country whose Chinook force isn’t operated by the Army as well as our MPAs (past and future) not being flown by the navy; again a concept that everyone else seems to grasp.
- 26 May 2018, 21:20
- Forum: British Army
- Topic: Ground Based Air Defence
- Replies: 743
- Views: 201083
Re: Ground Based Air Defence
WE actually might do as it allows the launcher to act autonomously if needed. For the cost, which for optics are far less than they used to be, it would be a no brainer. I didn't say we shouldn't get it..... The initial buy is one thing, including the support, maintaining and training will, I fear,...
- 26 May 2018, 16:23
- Forum: British Army
- Topic: Ground Based Air Defence
- Replies: 743
- Views: 201083
Re: Ground Based Air Defence
I’d guess the EO/IR sensor.Ron5 wrote:Both masts extended. One with datalink but what's on the other?
It’s an optional extra, which no doubt means we won’t be getting it.
- 25 May 2018, 20:12
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Mid-term review for the Strategic review?
- Replies: 703
- Views: 28156
Re: Mid-term review for the Strategic review?
Might end up with shiny kit but no one to operate it.
“The beatings will continue until morale improves.....”
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.u ... _FINAL.pdf
“The beatings will continue until morale improves.....”
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.u ... _FINAL.pdf
- 22 May 2018, 09:55
- Forum: Royal Air Force
- Topic: Boeing E-3D Sentry AEW.1 (AWACS) (RAF)
- Replies: 409
- Views: 184033
Re: Boeing E-3D Sentry AEW.1 (AWACS) (RAF)
It's ridiculous to use such a huge platform for that role, you've just doubled the procurement and operational costs for little benefit that is usable. How often do we expect our crews to be flying 13 hour patrols? In reality that rarely happens. If long endurance is such a big deal, try one of the...
- 21 May 2018, 17:17
- Forum: Royal Air Force
- Topic: Boeing E-3D Sentry AEW.1 (AWACS) (RAF)
- Replies: 409
- Views: 184033
Re: Boeing E-3D Sentry AEW.1 (AWACS) (RAF)
Japan missed out on a 707 platform (ours were the last made) so they got the same radar and similar mission system on a different aircraft. Doubt it’s even an option. Why the doubt? It has the same radar and mission kit on as the E-3 series. If we could upgrade our current mission kit to Block 40/4...
- 21 May 2018, 11:32
- Forum: Royal Air Force
- Topic: Boeing E-3D Sentry AEW.1 (AWACS) (RAF)
- Replies: 409
- Views: 184033
Re: Boeing E-3D Sentry AEW.1 (AWACS) (RAF)
Given the number of 737 based AEW&C platforms this would probably be the front runner. The latest offering from Sweden would also be on the list with Israel a possible dark horse. What the US chooses to do for its next platform could also have a say, but they will probably go down the Boeing ro...
- 21 May 2018, 06:22
- Forum: Royal Air Force
- Topic: Boeing E-3D Sentry AEW.1 (AWACS) (RAF)
- Replies: 409
- Views: 184033
Re: Boeing E-3D Sentry AEW.1 (AWACS) (RAF)
The E-3D are also a formal component of the NAEW&C, so there will be an agreement somewhere on tasking share over and above National needs.Lord Jim wrote:6-7 is the bare minimum the RAF need to be sure to provide the coverage needed.
- 20 May 2018, 21:32
- Forum: Royal Air Force
- Topic: Boeing E-3D Sentry AEW.1 (AWACS) (RAF)
- Replies: 409
- Views: 184033
Re: Boeing E-3D Sentry AEW.1 (AWACS) (RAF)
Considering its service a rather inglouious end as an AAPL, 'so others may live'.benny14 wrote: What was the story again behind that?
- 20 May 2018, 20:27
- Forum: Royal Air Force
- Topic: Boeing E-3D Sentry AEW.1 (AWACS) (RAF)
- Replies: 409
- Views: 184033
Re: Boeing E-3D Sentry AEW.1 (AWACS) (RAF)
Forgot about that. The forward fleet is 3, with 3 in the sustainment fleet. 6 still generates 3. Those figures are on a set date, and will yo-yo as frames move in and out of depth maintenance. I have seen the forward fleet higher than 3, and also lower...... Also being in the forward fleet doesn't ...
- 20 May 2018, 19:02
- Forum: Royal Air Force
- Topic: Boeing E-3D Sentry AEW.1 (AWACS) (RAF)
- Replies: 409
- Views: 184033
Re: Boeing E-3D Sentry AEW.1 (AWACS) (RAF)
We have 6, Sneezy didn’t make it.......benny14 wrote:The 7 we have only generate 3 for active use. Two for the UK, one overseas. Going lower than 6-7 would be incredibly silly.
- 20 May 2018, 14:09
- Forum: Royal Air Force
- Topic: Boeing E-3D Sentry AEW.1 (AWACS) (RAF)
- Replies: 409
- Views: 184033
Re: Boeing E-3D Sentry AEW.1 (AWACS) (RAF)
That is not the discussion at hand, that is appeal to extremes. You don't see the difference between going "we had thousands a hundred years ago!" and the point that cutting a fleet that only ever had 6-7 planes in recent history by yet more aircraft is a straight up cut? Feels a little l...
- 19 May 2018, 07:07
- Forum: Royal Air Force
- Topic: Boeing E-3D Sentry AEW.1 (AWACS) (RAF)
- Replies: 409
- Views: 184033
Re: Boeing E-3D Sentry AEW.1 (AWACS) (RAF)
5 new aircraft could not do as much as 6 E-3s that had been properly restored and upgraded to gain new flight hours. 5 down from 6 is a cut, there is no twist around that, and I will be surprised if they go for 6-7. Even if a ‘zero hours’ upgrade is on the table some parts will still be from the 70...
- 13 May 2018, 19:51
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
- Replies: 15455
- Views: 4457581
Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
I am not saying that CASD should be abandoned but what ever happens if HMG want it they needed to pay for it by upping the budget or moving the program out of the Budget as for it not being moved there is more pressure to do so. also lets remember that the cost was moved over to the MOD in 2010 and...
- 08 May 2018, 15:29
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19402
- Views: 9733783
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
I never said it wouldn’t fit, I was saying you were wrong.......shark bait wrote:a server and an antenna, how on earth are they going to fit that on a 7,000 tonne ship?
- 08 May 2018, 12:39
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19402
- Views: 9733783
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
Cooperative engagement is software, no in depth platform modifications needed. Bolting on some torpedo's is a trivial change too, they seem happy to bolt some harpoon launchers on the roof for the Canadian bid, torpedo should be no different. If the platform is right, adding these payloads is easy....
- 07 May 2018, 11:49
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Albion Class Amphibious Assault Ships (LPD) (RN)
- Replies: 568
- Views: 204966
Re: Albion Class Amphibious Assault Ships (LPD) (RN)
I've burnt dead cattle and put out fires while in uniform, sounds like an improvement.Ron5 wrote:He's even suggested publicly that the military should be used to fight crime. Not even in the fun way like the Philippines.
I don't see the issue with the CV of Sir Mark as NSA?
- 29 Apr 2018, 07:33
- Forum: Royal Air Force
- Topic: Eurofighter Typhoon (RAF)
- Replies: 2837
- Views: 778636
Re: Eurofighter Typhoon (RAF)
I find it remarkable that a bit of inter-force banter about a name gets taken so seriously by some. Chill out, poking fun is a forces tradition, after all. Only one person is taking it seriously! Apparently even daring to utter the word ‘Pathfinder’ (ssssh) is enough to be on the receiving end of a...
- 26 Apr 2018, 09:24
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19402
- Views: 9733783
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
I was trying to demonstrate how low the threshold is (not recommending contracting practices). Out of interest, why do you think the Head of the said office recently resigned? - the proportion of single sourcing, of the total, is so high that the use of the office had turned into rubber stamping - ...
- 26 Apr 2018, 07:56
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19402
- Views: 9733783
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
The idea is to sell them off early to support more building. If they can make that work its a nice idea. There are tonnes of years willing to sell cheap gun boats filled with government subsidies. The UK will not compete on that ground, but maybe it could by selling quality used commissioned RN ves...
- 25 Apr 2018, 18:55
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19402
- Views: 9733783
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
Now that thru-life costs are the mandatory yard stick, the above is less than what it sounds. - e.g. Ron just informed us that it stands for 1/11th of the (10 yr, rather than thru-life) cost for 500 MIVs - so you can, as a grown up, go and buy 500/11 armoured vehicles; a quantity that would only co...