Search found 290 matches

by Tinman
01 Sep 2016, 21:37
Forum: British Army
Topic: Section Infantry Weapons
Replies: 1492
Views: 461073
United Kingdom

Re: Section infantry weapons

Barrel length possibly? With out have a dig about that's the first thing that comes to mind.
by Tinman
27 Aug 2016, 06:40
Forum: Royal Air Force
Topic: Eurofighter Typhoon (RAF)
Replies: 2842
Views: 789845
United Kingdom

Re: Typhoon

downsizer wrote:Airshows..... ;)
Plus documentaries about "our skies".
by Tinman
07 Aug 2016, 12:50
Forum: British Army
Topic: Section Infantry Weapons
Replies: 1492
Views: 461073
United Kingdom

Re: Section infantry weapons

I will stick too the issued 5.56mm, it's plenty of kinetic energy too reach out and touch.
by Tinman
31 Jul 2016, 07:33
Forum: Royal Navy
Topic: Type 45 Destroyer (Daring Class) (RN) [News Only]
Replies: 1996
Views: 573395
United Kingdom

Re: Type 45 Destroyer (Daring Class) (RN)

All T45's are at their home port. http://news.sky.com/story/all-royal-navys-advanced-destroyers-in-port-10516991 Reasons why. https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/despite-issues-majority-of-type-45-destroyer-fleet-remains-operational/ The Type 45 is the most advanced BMD platform in the world ?????? Giv...
by Tinman
06 Jun 2016, 14:58
Forum: Royal Navy
Topic: Astute Class Attack Submarine (SSN) (RN)
Replies: 856
Views: 312150
United Kingdom

Re: Astute Class Attack Submarine (SSN) (RN)

About CoE, I think that in most of countries finance/treasury departments have a very important role in running the government. But I have a question about Astute class subs. I wonder, if we compare them with say, Virginia class- Astutes have much more peculiar form of hull. While Virginia has clas...
by Tinman
29 May 2016, 18:08
Forum: Joint Service
Topic: British Forces Personal Issue Kit Thread
Replies: 102
Views: 71521
United Kingdom

Re: British Forces Personal Issue Kit Thread

Army Recognition realises that project Virtus has commenced initial issue to some UK Troops http://www.armyrecognition.com/weapons_defence_industry_military_technology_uk/the_new_virtus_body_armour_system_is_now_issued_to_the_british_infantry_troops_32005163.html The opinions I've heard are that it...
by Tinman
24 May 2016, 12:18
Forum: British Army
Topic: Ajax Armoured Vehicles (British Army)
Replies: 2434
Views: 544143
United Kingdom

Re: Ajax Armoured Vehicle Variants (Army)

Just a shame we didn't follow the commonwealth in the 90's and buy of the shelf the Piranah Having attended a repatriation parade for five Canadian soldiers killed by an IED in a Piranha in 2007. No. Having spent a tour as force protection on MERT, I would say that the vehicles bought on UOR saved ...
by Tinman
24 May 2016, 06:19
Forum: British Army
Topic: Ajax Armoured Vehicles (British Army)
Replies: 2434
Views: 544143
United Kingdom

Re: Ajax Armoured Vehicle Variants (Army)

Have you been in, on or used any of those "shit UOR" vehicles? No, I understand they had there value, they we're available, and they saved lives, but I don't believe they are valuable beyond fighting in the desert. We should realize we we're unprepared, and should plan so we are properly ...
by Tinman
23 May 2016, 12:50
Forum: British Army
Topic: Ajax Armoured Vehicles (British Army)
Replies: 2434
Views: 544143
United Kingdom

Re: Ajax Armoured Vehicle Variants (Army)

shark bait wrote:it sure does! If they had followed through on boxer there wouldn't be the shit UOR fleet the British army is left with now.

On top of the cancellation of boxer there's the cancellation of Piranha too. Third time lucky?
Have you been in, on or used any of those "shit UOR" vehicles?
by Tinman
18 May 2016, 18:09
Forum: British Army
Topic: Section Infantry Weapons
Replies: 1492
Views: 461073
United Kingdom

Re: Section infantry weapons

Then what happens to manoeuvre, close with?

Fast aggressive movement with weight of fire wins.

Not static.
by Tinman
17 May 2016, 06:29
Forum: British Army
Topic: Section Infantry Weapons
Replies: 1492
Views: 461073
United Kingdom

Re: Section infantry weapons

The BA's preferences keep shifting. They acquired the short-barrelled Minimi in Iraq as a short-range bullet-sprayer; close in, volume of fire matters. In the much longer ranges typical of Afghanistan, it was of little use and the L86A2 came back into favour as its long barrel squeezed the most out...
by Tinman
16 May 2016, 03:58
Forum: Royal Air Force
Topic: Boeing P-8A Poseidon (MRA Mk.1) (RAF)
Replies: 1271
Views: 471265
United Kingdom

Re: Boeing P-8A Poseidon (Future Maritime Patrol Aircraft) (RAF)

pretty much zilch on the UK jobs from this one. Has to be expected with an american aircraft. Why should there? Capability lost due to X promising Y, forgetting about A. Lessons learned, the army is about to go through the same for MBT after the AJAX dealings. Have little idea what this means but i...
by Tinman
13 May 2016, 19:37
Forum: Royal Air Force
Topic: Boeing P-8A Poseidon (MRA Mk.1) (RAF)
Replies: 1271
Views: 471265
United Kingdom

Re: Boeing P-8A Poseidon (Future Maritime Patrol Aircraft) (RAF)

shark bait wrote:pretty much zilch on the UK jobs from this one. Has to be expected with an american aircraft.
Why should there?

Capability lost due to X promising Y, forgetting about A.

Lessons learned, the army is about to go through the same for MBT after the AJAX dealings.
by Tinman
13 May 2016, 19:34
Forum: Royal Air Force
Topic: Airbus A400M Atlas (RAF)
Replies: 394
Views: 163048
United Kingdom

Re: Airbus A400M Atlas (RAF)

Have I mentioned that the RAF have recently conducted free fall trials from the C17?
by Tinman
08 May 2016, 12:58
Forum: Royal Air Force
Topic: General Atomics MQ-9 Reaper/Protector (UCAV) (RAF)
Replies: 289
Views: 143772
United Kingdom

Re: General Atomics MQ-9 Reaper (UCAV) (RAF)

downsizer wrote:
Tinman wrote:But you don't need to make it easier for people that don't have the "need" to know. Do you?
Come on mate, it's the interwebz. Spotters are more important than OpSec. Basics, FFS.... ;)
Indeed, I shall punish myself by doing the 5 miles of death twice.
by Tinman
07 May 2016, 09:51
Forum: Royal Air Force
Topic: General Atomics MQ-9 Reaper/Protector (UCAV) (RAF)
Replies: 289
Views: 143772
United Kingdom

Re: General Atomics MQ-9 Reaper (UCAV) (RAF)

shark bait wrote:Pfffftt, once it's in the public domain you can't take it back.
But you don't need to make it easier for people that don't have the "need" to know. Do you?
by Tinman
05 May 2016, 10:56
Forum: British Army
Topic: FV4034 Challenger 2 Main Battle Tank (British Army)
Replies: 2323
Views: 1056329
United Kingdom

Re: Challenger 2 Main Battle Tank (Army)

@Armchaircivvy the Armata, don't believe the hype.
by Tinman
04 May 2016, 12:04
Forum: Royal Air Force
Topic: Royal Air Force fantasy fleet builder
Replies: 37
Views: 22163
United Kingdom

Re: Royal Air Force fantasy fleet builder

We had Tornado F3 trailed as a WW option, very successful IIRC.
by Tinman
01 May 2016, 19:56
Forum: British Army
Topic: FV4034 Challenger 2 Main Battle Tank (British Army)
Replies: 2323
Views: 1056329
United Kingdom

Re: Challenger 2 Main Battle Tank (Army)

Yeah, bringing in Streetfighter kits. All 22 of them... Thing is, the Leclerc already has one of the best FCS around and C4I systems to match, it's been kept up to date. It's exceptionally good inside, probably only bested by the Leopard 2A7 and M1A2 SEPv2. Challenger is still using the same stuff ...
by Tinman
29 Apr 2016, 18:39
Forum: UK Defence Forum
Topic: UK Defence Forum - A Year On
Replies: 21
Views: 2232
United Kingdom

Re: UK Defence Forum - A Year On

Congratulations on your first year, well done! What would I like? I would like to see a wider international base of contributors discussing current events and tech procedures. I can be patient, though. Generally, a bit more humour and light heartedness please. Less Fanboi wishes and wet dreams. Reg...
by Tinman
16 Apr 2016, 19:11
Forum: Royal Navy
Topic: River Class (OPV) (RN)
Replies: 5492
Views: 1568917
United Kingdom

Re: river I/I.5 and II patrol vessels

The French can't sustain Carrier Ops, as they only have one. We will have two in a couple of years. True, and that puts them in the number two spot. We will replace them in that spot in a few years time. well it appears to have worked very well for the last 30-40 years with a variety of classes of ...
by Tinman
15 Apr 2016, 16:46
Forum: Royal Navy
Topic: River Class (OPV) (RN)
Replies: 5492
Views: 1568917
United Kingdom

Re: river I/I.5 and II patrol vessels

BTW who is the other one? China? India? because the french haven't rushed head long into single role support vessels and have a more balanced fleet. Only the French and the Americans can sustain high tempo carrier operations. The Brits will join the club soon, as may china. As for single role suppo...
by Tinman
15 Apr 2016, 16:44
Forum: Joint Service
Topic: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)
Replies: 6102
Views: 1780335
United Kingdom

Re: F-35B Lightning II (RN & RAF)

It's about making the most efficient use of what you have. There simply isn't the money to keep every piece of kit ready for day 1 of the war. And frankly it would be wasteful to do so. The problem is that the kit is not even stored away this day. Not in numbers / conditions sufficient to have them...
by Tinman
13 Apr 2016, 19:40
Forum: Royal Navy
Topic: River Class (OPV) (RN)
Replies: 5492
Views: 1568917
United Kingdom

Re: river I/I.5 and II patrol vessels

Donald are you really suggesting that a T42 circa 2010 would be malted by the Argentinian Airforce? May be... What I "thought" is, 12x A4, and a few SuperEtendar can beat a single T42. They will lose 4-8 aircrafts, but they can sink T42, I guess. What I am not sure is, if Argentine can pr...
by Tinman
12 Apr 2016, 11:33
Forum: Royal Navy
Topic: River Class (OPV) (RN)
Replies: 5492
Views: 1568917
United Kingdom

Re: river I/I.5 and II patrol vessels

Ministers do stupid things and overrule the military all the time. Often they think they know best when they simply don't. One grey hull doesn't look all that different from another to the average politician and all of them believe the RN to be some sort of ultimate unbeatable force. No. Stupid min...