Search found 177 matches
- 29 Jan 2017, 22:01
- Forum: Royal Air Force
- Topic: BAE Replica (Future Offensive Air System) (Cancelled Project)
- Replies: 48
- Views: 24211
Re: BAE Replica (Cancelled Project)
Ron, I accept my post was badly written. FOAS was to look at tornado replacement and replica was to gain exprience in stealth. Though replica is similar to the jsf proposal I think there are differences in the wing in particular, though it seems clear the designs are related, whilst the main result ...
- 28 Jan 2017, 23:32
- Forum: UK Defence & Aerospace Industry
- Topic: BAE Systems plc
- Replies: 191
- Views: 16614
Re: BAE Systems plc
Personally I'd be dubious about letting the Turks build ej220s on license. I don't trust erdogan at all. Despite a well structured and thought out development program I doubt they could design their own Mach 2 engine so they're definitely gonna need help on that front. Perhaps something like a cross...
- 28 Jan 2017, 21:05
- Forum: Royal Air Force
- Topic: BAE Replica (Future Offensive Air System) (Cancelled Project)
- Replies: 48
- Views: 24211
Re: BAE Replica (Cancelled Project)
Didn't some photos appear a year or so ago showing Bae had got the model back up at their radar return testing pole, anyone ever hear what that was all about? Funny to think not that long ago the raf planned this as it's tornado replacement (f35 performance wasn't good enough for the role they claim...
- 28 Jan 2017, 21:00
- Forum: Deployments
- Topic: Red Flag
- Replies: 3
- Views: 731
Re: Red Flag
Prepare for an explosion of Internet forum flame wars as the first leaked 'results' appear from DACT exercises involving f22/35 and typhoon and f18!
- 28 Jan 2017, 20:57
- Forum: UK Defence & Aerospace Industry
- Topic: BAE Systems plc
- Replies: 191
- Views: 16614
Re: BAE Systems plc
IIRC they had ej220s in mind for the engine from the beginning so I'd be fairly certain that's what the Turks are after. They said at the start they were confident with most aspects of producing their indigenous fighter but not the engine and some of the higher tech electronics. Would imagine they'l...
- 28 Jan 2017, 19:38
- Forum: Joint Service
- Topic: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)
- Replies: 6097
- Views: 1759425
Re: F-35B Lightning II (RN & RAF)
Mr Fred, Ron has given you a couple of nice pics above but there's a nice gallery of pictures here - http://www.jsf.mil/gallery/gal_photo_cddr_mda-ngc-bae.htm and also a little bit of info on the design too. The secret projects forum also has a really long thread with just about everything that's ev...
- 27 Jan 2017, 20:28
- Forum: Joint Service
- Topic: F-35B Lightning (RAF & RN)
- Replies: 6097
- Views: 1759425
Re: F-35B Lightning II (RN & RAF)
There are two versions of that documentary, watched them both a while ago. The content is virtually identical but one had an American presenter and the other a British one that obviously looks at it very slightly more from a uk PoV. Personally I loved the NG/MDD/BAE JSF proposal that was eliminated ...
- 22 Jan 2017, 23:00
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: General UK Defence Discussion
- Replies: 1933
- Views: 253985
Re: General UK Defence Discussion
Following their revelations about the trident test failure the times also had an article about a paper that's just been published by the centre for historical analysis and conflict research that was backed by rusi (i think) that Russia could destroy the army in an afternoon and that defence cuts hav...
- 07 Jan 2017, 20:09
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19399
- Views: 9723823
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
It mostly is bullshit, 2 carriers was a manifesto promise, it was planned in the SDSR, and 2 confirmed again today. The idea of a large LPH and maintaining one task group at sea contentiously is a nice one. Would love to think youre right but I don't trust the govt one bit. They may have promised 2...
- 06 Jan 2017, 14:52
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Royal Navy General News
- Replies: 82
- Views: 8052
Re: Royal Navy General News
Continuing from the carrier thread also. Absolutely disgusting. As I said I'd mothball POW then shout it from the rooftops in the hope of embarrassing them. Our only hope is for the forces leaders to start standing up to the govt and not toe the line. Otherwise I agree funding won't be increased and...
- 06 Jan 2017, 14:40
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
- Replies: 15455
- Views: 4451521
Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
Hence why I reckon they ought to shout mothball POW from the rooftops cos cutting anything else makes it a paper tiger any how. Level of political embarrassment for the govt would at least give some hope of things being sorted out. Guess that depends what foreign aid or diversity projects urgently n...
- 06 Jan 2017, 13:52
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
- Replies: 15455
- Views: 4451521
Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
Armchair soldier, Beat me to it! Was just about to post that one - depressing start to my day as I read that this morning :( Having had time to digest the article, if the forces higher ups had any balls I'd go for mothballing the POW then trumpet it all over the place and humiliate the govt. in the ...
- 05 Jan 2017, 00:49
- Forum: British Army
- Topic: FV4034 Challenger 2 Main Battle Tank (British Army)
- Replies: 2323
- Views: 1044703
Re: Challenger 2 Main Battle Tank (Army)
Mr. Fred - I agree it seems cheap and am only quoting what the article says. All - Though I don't know much about tanks I Would trust you guys ahead of newspaper journalists when I consider the shocking levels ignorance I've seen from defence correspondents on subjects I do know more a little more a...
- 04 Jan 2017, 21:22
- Forum: British Army
- Topic: FV4034 Challenger 2 Main Battle Tank (British Army)
- Replies: 2323
- Views: 1044703
Re: Challenger 2 Main Battle Tank (Army)
Article In Today's times claiming army considered replacing chally 2s with latest leopard as it could have worked out better value for money than the current upgrade but the mod backed out cos they were scared of bad PR. if they ever felt it wouldn't be too bad the option would still be on the table...
- 04 Jan 2017, 21:10
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Type 23 Frigate (Duke Class) (RN) [News Only]
- Replies: 1013
- Views: 435558
Re: Type 23 Frigate (Duke Class) (RN) [News Only]
Retrosicotte & ACC, Many thanks. Hopefully I'll live long enough to find out about artisan and its competitors! Interesting that some sources seem to indicate it's in some superior to herakles, I've also seen other people compare it less flatteringly to herakles too though. To be fair though the...
- 03 Jan 2017, 13:12
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Type 23 Frigate (Duke Class) (RN) [News Only]
- Replies: 1013
- Views: 435558
Re: Type 23 Frigate (Duke Class) (RN) [News Only]
Not arguing, just asking, but how is artisan as or ore capable then? I often hear that you can't just go with the top trumps (which make sense) but haven't seen any solid information to counter. Most of the hard stats I see seem to indicate artisan is behind most modern 3 and 4d AESA radars most of ...
- 16 Dec 2016, 20:14
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19399
- Views: 9723823
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
T31 bottom line: T23 capability on a Venator displacement is fantasy. A noisy, slow, OPV with hangar and bigger pop gun is the best we can hope for. Actually cancellation of t31 to be replaced with more lower spec t26's i.e. the original plan, is the best but given the dimwits making the decisions,...
- 14 Dec 2016, 22:25
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
- Replies: 15455
- Views: 4451521
Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
Aren't cat/trap operations weather/condition restrained so how in that regard is f35b any different to sharkey's beloved hornets? Sure I remember reading a large percentage of the Falklands war flying couldn't have been done with cats and traps due to appalling visibility and sea states...
- 13 Dec 2016, 20:17
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19399
- Views: 9723823
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
ACC/sharkbait, As far as I know there's no real substantial info available so I've no idea which option would be best for the RN. From the tiny amount I have seen tern gives the impression of being furthest along and most closely matching what I think we need (not that that means much!). A 900NM ran...
- 13 Dec 2016, 00:52
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19399
- Views: 9723823
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
Another "tail-sitter" in the works: http://breakingdefense.com/2016/12/marines-want-drone-mux-faster-for-v-22-escort/?utm_source=hs_email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=39066313&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-8MWrNm9Zzu_i1XeKyQ5RuszkB0uUdUZv--Rvgf8x0fkK5VQDamPl3AvCBsF-BRgtM1vBAVRL8HNJno1_hFy5nt...
- 05 Dec 2016, 20:07
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]
- Replies: 8490
- Views: 2195144
Re: Type 31 General Purpose Frigate [News Only]
Even though ACC overstated Crowsnest's abilities, in a sense, the Marines have benefited already. The USN & Marines were very impressed with the Sea King's baggers over land capabilities over Iraq. Very helpful to said Marines. So they spent a bunch of money in upgrading their E-2's to have com...
- 03 Dec 2016, 21:19
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]
- Replies: 8490
- Views: 2195144
Re: Type 31 General Purpose Frigate [News Only]
- do you understand that Crowsnest is an off-board sensor, and available to anyone that can connect with a supported protocol? - there are plenty of those (Link-16, TARAS, TIDLS, STRIL, MADL, IFDL...) - if you know anything about the topic area, you will recognise what these protocols are mainly us...
- 29 Nov 2016, 21:42
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]
- Replies: 8490
- Views: 2195144
Re: Type 31 General Purpose Frigate [News Only]
I need to read the report properly and in detail again but am actually a little concerned after a quick first read. Whilst there were some sensible suggestions there was noting that wasn't really common sense or not been suggested here/elsewhere before. My main concern though was the report seemed t...
- 29 Nov 2016, 18:48
- Forum: British Army
- Topic: FV4034 Challenger 2 Main Battle Tank (British Army)
- Replies: 2323
- Views: 1044703
Re: Challenger 2 Main Battle Tank (Army)
Even though I have got ( too early to say) the same impression on the RN side of things as you, lets remember that Carter has been in charge ever since Gen. Wall asked him to produce an alternative plan to the MRBs (to kill them). I really hope you're right and I have been known to be overly parano...
- 27 Nov 2016, 22:29
- Forum: British Army
- Topic: FV4034 Challenger 2 Main Battle Tank (British Army)
- Replies: 2323
- Views: 1044703
Re: Challenger 2 Main Battle Tank (Army)
Gabrielle, funny the first thing I thought when I read the times article was that you've been saying this is a danger and a crazy (fully agree with your Twitter comments today I saw through your blog too) decision. I share your concerns about Carter too. We're gonna end up with the worst of both wor...