Search found 775 matches
- 03 Mar 2017, 21:57
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19404
- Views: 9742948
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
So I've recently been modelling various different build schedules and escort fleet compositions for the RN. Yielded some interesting results imo. Firstly, the original 13 Type 26 at a 1.5 yr build interval winds up producing a ~15 year decline in escort numbers, down to 15 at the lowest point before...
- 16 Feb 2017, 17:16
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Trafalgar Class Attack Submarine (SSN) (RN)
- Replies: 81
- Views: 52214
Re: Trafalgar Class Attack Submarine (SSN) (RN)
SSN Availability has been too low for a while now, this sounds like its only going to make things worse, RN do appear to be in a bad situation with their boats. Trenchant is an old boat, pushed beyond the original design specification, so it's not surprising to see issues like this arise. A fractur...
- 14 Feb 2017, 19:12
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Rest in peace RN :-(
- Replies: 142
- Views: 6497
Re: Rest in peace RN :-(
So, for the people interested in the broad strokes of what I envision for an "austere" T-31 you'll remember my list of things on the T-26 that I consider unnecessary/to be more modest on T-31: -Accommodation for a large EMF. -Chinook capable flight deck. -Mission bay in the superstructure....
- 13 Feb 2017, 19:34
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Rest in peace RN :-(
- Replies: 142
- Views: 6497
Re: Rest in peace RN :-(
hanger for 2 helicopters thats 2 Wildcat helicopters or 1 merlin I believe it needs to be bigger than a simple Merlin-sized hangar in order to fit two Wildcats. Either way a hangar sized for two Wildcats is, frankly, excessive when we only have 28 of them in total. Type 26 is the ASW specialist, it...
- 13 Feb 2017, 16:40
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Rest in peace RN :-(
- Replies: 142
- Views: 6497
Re: Rest in peace RN :-(
Well yes, 14 sounds ridiculously low to me, but what do I know - that's why I ask. It is ridiculously low. Zero chance of sustaining a carrier group, protecting CASD and doing other key tasks concurrently. Could you flesh out what you mean by "half way credible"? The trick will be buildin...
- 13 Feb 2017, 08:49
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Rest in peace RN :-(
- Replies: 142
- Views: 6497
Re: Rest in peace RN :-(
1) is 14 high end escorts sufficient for the RN's commitments, and possible future war scenarios? If you want only 14 proper FF/DD you have to ask, can the RN do what's required of them with 13? How about 10? I ask, because during peacetime things like this happen: http://news.bbc.co.uk/media/image...
- 12 Feb 2017, 19:16
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Astute Class Attack Submarine (SSN) (RN)
- Replies: 856
- Views: 309412
Re: Astute Class Attack Submarine (SSN) (RN)
I'm not trolling anyone. A few brave Times journalists and people like myself want answers, as to why taxpayers are constantly being asked to pour unbelievably humungous sums of money into the bottomless pit that is MoD/BAe... So why exactly do you want this gigantic cock-up covered up? Who's payin...
- 12 Feb 2017, 18:52
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19404
- Views: 9742948
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
We can compare them with the US kit if you like them more? US kit is more capable in many respects, it is also significantly more expensive and requires a lot more manpower. 40% more for a flight II Burke compared to a Type 45. They have the money and the manpower to buy and operate ships like that...
- 12 Feb 2017, 16:29
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Astute Class Attack Submarine (SSN) (RN)
- Replies: 856
- Views: 309412
Re: Astute Class Attack Submarine (SSN) (RN)
Its all true, information that is in the public domain - Daily Telegraph, Guardian, Devenport News, Washington Post, Pravda and other RN forums. Because it's written in the papers and on internet forums it's all true . Your naievity is astounding. I dont need to have security clearance to complain ...
- 12 Feb 2017, 11:31
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Astute Class Attack Submarine (SSN) (RN)
- Replies: 856
- Views: 309412
Re: Astute Class Attack Submarine (SSN) (RN)
None of the Astute class boats are currently available. This does not tally with information I have from sources I trust absolutely. The Navy has confined them to port awaiting a decision on the best way forward to fix severe quality related corrosion issues in reactor coolant pumps and pipework. T...
- 12 Feb 2017, 00:53
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19404
- Views: 9742948
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
If you don't see that say, Mistral class has both hangers and dock, Juan Carlos/Canberra too, Trieste will too, that Rotterdam/Galicia/Foudre class have both hangers and docks, What you're missing is that all of those ships needed hangars because their respective navies had different requirements. ...
- 11 Feb 2017, 14:33
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19404
- Views: 9742948
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
There was apparently a Babcock proposal that everyone presumed was a stretched Samuel Beckett OPV. From the looks of it the Spartan is new on the scene.~UNiOnJaCk~ wrote:Wasn't there meant to be a fourth, previously undisclosed design submitted for the T31 proposal? If so, then maybe this was it?
- 11 Feb 2017, 14:22
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19404
- Views: 9742948
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
Considering what the RN has got during last 2 decades LPDs without hanger for helicopters Designed to fit within a coherent force structure that put the hangar off-board in order to maximise space on the LPD for troops and equipment. helicopter carriers without dock Why would Ocean need a well dock...
- 11 Feb 2017, 07:52
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19404
- Views: 9742948
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
This is likely to be about double the price of the BAE options(?), and this concept in particular would carry more risk, presumably. At least with the Venator the design work would be a bit more mature, but even then, if the aim is to 1) export (to the types of countries Donald listed previously), ...
- 10 Feb 2017, 19:22
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19404
- Views: 9742948
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
Looking over that: 1x 127mm MK45 Mod4 16x Mk41 8x CAMM silos (Possibly quad silos? Picture is unclear.) 8x ASMs 1x Phalanx CIWS 2x 30mm DS30 Plus: - Artisan 3D - Towed Sonar space - Well deck area - Helo facilities Venator just got its first real competitor on the high end. That looks delicious . A...
- 10 Feb 2017, 17:03
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19404
- Views: 9742948
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
Interesting. A new design concept for GPFF enters the fray from the Gloucestershire based naval architecture consultancy "Stellar Systems". Named "Project Spartan".
- 26 Jan 2017, 18:15
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19404
- Views: 9742948
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
I think he means a ship close by to act as a "goalkeeper" for any leakers.Ron5 wrote:"Plane guard" ??
Not these days. The RN will have a helo on standby for any splashes.
- 22 Jan 2017, 09:49
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19404
- Views: 9742948
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
I agree, the Carrier Task Farce IS going to be the force the UK generates, the only one, assuming a carrier is actually available when needed and that is not a certainty yet. Any amphibious shipping is going to have to tag along using the same escort group. This is only the case if you think that w...
- 30 Dec 2016, 15:58
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19404
- Views: 9742948
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
Hanger is actually quite cheap and the Type 22 missile only armed frigate was discredited in 82. The gun isn't actually that expensive. The hangar structure is, but the length overall that it adds isn't. 25 meters of modern warship ain't cheap. The gun takes up a space that you can't put something ...
- 30 Dec 2016, 10:25
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19404
- Views: 9742948
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
That the crux of your argument right there. A platform similar to that description would be perfect for a focused towed array ship to listen for subs far away, and then cue a merlin from the carrier to go and investigate. The question being is it reasonable to have a platform with such a narrow ban...
- 30 Dec 2016, 09:51
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19404
- Views: 9742948
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
I know it sounds slightly mad, but what do you make of a Type 31 with a flight deck but without a hangar? A concept carried over from the Type 82, one of the last ships we designed whose sole role was to be a carrier escort. The idea being why bother with a small hangar when you've got an enormous f...
- 23 Dec 2016, 01:54
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
- Replies: 15455
- Views: 4463856
Re: Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers - News and Discussion
Wouldn't it make more sense to compare to the bad guy's carriers? Not really, seeing as none are anywhere near a Nimitz in terms of theoretical maximum and actual realised capability. Frankly neither Kuznetsov nor Liaoning is a Patch on Charles De Gaulle in practice. For all intents and purposes Ru...
- 06 Dec 2016, 20:50
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19404
- Views: 9742948
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
What are the classic attributes that define a cruiser? -long range. -ability to operate independently for extended periods. -capable of independent self defence. -command and control facilities. I'd argue that the Type 26 with a containerised command facility embarked ticks all those boxes. While th...
- 03 Dec 2016, 21:31
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]
- Replies: 8497
- Views: 2200922
Re: Type 31 General Purpose Frigate [News Only]
*Cough* USMC *Cough*cky7 wrote:Surely there are a lot of allied nations out there that could really benefit from such a flexible and capable set up?
- 01 Dec 2016, 18:48
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Type 31 Frigate (Inspiration Class) [News Only]
- Replies: 8497
- Views: 2200922
Re: Type 31 General Purpose Frigate [News Only]
Why would we not include provisions for T31 to mount the most popular VLS system in the world? If the idea is to be modular and adaptable to the customer's needs the ability to fit Mk.41 cells, maybe not full length strike cells, but certainly the shorter cells for ESSM, would seem pretty important....