No flapping here, just a simple extrapolation of your position points to the gravy train..... You've tried to pin multiple different things on me so far, and failed in every one. Pretty obvious you're flapping. Even Labour estimate that the NHS is waisting 10 billion a year.... Not quite. £2Bn of t...

You don't see that there's an obvious issue with promoting people simply based on the length of time they have on the payroll????!!! I see no evidence that it's happening. No one I speak to that works in the NHS says that's the case. The NHS just haemorrhages money, billions upon billions every sin...

Have you looked at the rest of the Shrewsbury and Telford Trust its a dumpster fire and it isn't the only trust like it either in NHS England as for Scotland and Wales, well. You are in complete denial. Denial of what exactly? Because I'm all for pointing out the failings of the NHS, fire away by a...

You are having a laugh, aren't you? No, but obviously you are. Why is it people roll our the personal (no, second hand) anecdotes when shown the facts. And yet they are complicit in the alleged wrong doing, or it's clearly a pile of nonsense. The NHS is one of the most highly audited organisations ...

One of the reasons NHS admin and management perform so very poorly is because people get promoted purely based on length of service, no matter how bloody useless they might be, what could possibly go wrong with that business model? And yet the evidence is entirely to the contrary on NHS performance...

So I take it you work for NHS Wales then? With this link and your previous about health records. You're definitely not MI, maybe you were MPGS with skills like that? Well you seemed to have great knowledge of the file sizes of diagnostic imaging. I have knowledge of imaging in general, and it's a s...

You are having a laugh, aren't you? No, but obviously you are. Why is it people roll our the personal (no, second hand) anecdotes when shown the facts. And yet they are complicit in the alleged wrong doing, or it's clearly a pile of nonsense. The NHS is one of the most highly audited organisations ...

tomuk wrote: ↑17 Apr 2024, 18:46 So I take it you work for NHS Wales then? With this link and your previous about health records.

You're definitely not MI, maybe you were MPGS with skills like that?

Now you are just being ridiculous. Since it seems to miss so much, it can't be that good. Do you have an issue with facts? As for the substance of what I said, how do you think these cases were known? People in a position to know did blow the whistle. People did get caught. People did get sanctione...

You are having a laugh, aren't you? No, but obviously you are. Why is it people roll our the personal (no, second hand) anecdotes when shown the facts. And yet they are complicit in the alleged wrong doing, or it's clearly a pile of nonsense. The NHS is one of the most highly audited organisations ...

If it so efficient to do it the NHS way why aren't the required level of diagnostics being carried out such that cancer and other outcomes aren't as poor as they are? Germany has 70 scanners per m pop, to our 16, their towns and cities aren't spread over an outback wilderness. Because pre-pandemic ...

Not at all, the government hold 'plenty' of such digital information on you already, believe me.... They literally don't. Because aside from your image held on your passport and driving license, unless you're a naughty sod and they have your prints and DNA, everything they have is text or numerical...

The whole thing is structured incorrectly. Look at the link you posted, take Australia and UK, looking at OECD figures Aus is spending 16% more on healthcare per head than we are. So more but not an unreasonable difference, about $879 per head. They have 424% more MRIs and CT machines than the NHS,...

I can look out of my living room window and see on my phone why my neighbours car failed it's MOT in 2016, yet my surgeon has to get his secretary to write to another hospital to get my records!!! We've had computer linked banking since the 1970's for Christ's sake... It's absolutely pathetic quite...

The whole thing is structured incorrectly. Look at the link you posted, take Australia and UK, looking at OECD figures Aus is spending 16% more on healthcare per head than we are. So more but not an unreasonable difference, about $879 per head. They have 424% more MRIs and CT machines than the NHS,...

The whole thing is structured incorrectly. Look at the link you posted, take Australia and UK, looking at OECD figures Aus is spending 16% more on healthcare per head than we are. So more but not an unreasonable difference, about $879 per head. They have 424% more MRIs and CT machines than the NHS,...

tomuk wrote: ↑16 Apr 2024, 18:29 Yes the NHS needs reform before anymore cash.

That's not how reform works.

"The NHS is internationally recognised as being one of the most cost efficient health care systems in the world." Noone can say you don't have a sense of humour.... It's just reality. Perhaps you could join us here sometime? https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/insight-and-analysis/blogs/comparin...

You think 182 billion is affordable in the long term and apparently it's 'critically' underfunded! ... We are currently spending more than we earn as a country every year and going deeper and deeper into debt, just how long can we afford to keep pouring hundreds of billions into a broken health car...

Ok lets go with your view that the NHS is the best thing since sliced bread and can do no wrong and any issues it does have would magically disappear with a bit more cash. How much more money does it need? £5bn\year, £10bn\year, £100bn\year? I've said nothing of the sort. You clearly believe that t...

mrclark303 wrote: ↑16 Apr 2024, 14:44 And you don't seem to understand the difference an additional 7/8 billion would mean...

To social housing? To energy infrastructure? To policing?

Oh dear, I'll take a wild guess that you work in the NHS in an administrative capacity, as viewing that slow motion car crash from inside out, is the only possible way you could consider it well run...... Nope, try again. You've in total denial if you think it's just dandy, I've claimed nothing of ...

I have but you clearly don't understand it. The link you posted shows the spending in 'real terms' i.e. inflation is accounted for. It confirms on average NHS spending has increased 3.6% a year after inflation. That's after economic inflation (as basket of goods), that's not the inflation that the ...

2.5% is a relitivly low level, it's only returning us to 2010 % levels. That makes zero sense. Relative to what? If in 2010 we paid 2.47% of GDPR, and less since, then that makes 2.5% relatively high. As high as 2000, too. 2.5% would make us 6th highest in NATO. So relative to what is 2.5% low? It'...

NHS funding had gone up by 50% since 2010! Err yeah, that's not surprising when you consider heslthcare inflation and population health. The NHS is poorly run, it's vast administrative arm is something akin to the Soviet Union, where different General hospitals have a small army of administrators, ...