Search found 53 matches

by military
07 May 2021, 23:40
Forum: British Army
Topic: FV4034 Challenger 2 Main Battle Tank (British Army)
Replies: 2323
Views: 1038306
United States of America

Re: FV4034 Challenger 2 Main Battle Tank (British Army)

[quote="mr.fred"148 for £800m. At about £5.5m each that seems cheap.[/quote]

That is without the APS (60 of them, apparently) and probably without changes to the engines.
by military
14 Mar 2021, 15:36
Forum: British Army
Topic: Obsolescent and outgunned
Replies: 30
Views: 7889
United States of America

Re: Obsolescent and outgunned

Too bad there is not a separate report on the deplorable state of the artillery!
by military
12 Mar 2021, 14:54
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Army Command to 2030
Replies: 51
Views: 3713
United States of America

Re: Army Command to 2030

The Boxer contract, with production stretching to say 2032, for 500 vehicles has already been signed with KMW and Rheinmetall and there are no CRV and IFV versions. At this point we need to work with the Ajax and Boxer variants that are under contract.
by military
28 Nov 2020, 23:12
Forum: Conflicts
Topic: Tigray conflict
Replies: 8
Views: 795
United States of America

Re: Tigray conflict

It seems like the national government forces have taken the Tigray capital. Are there any good sources reporting on the battles on the ground?
by military
21 Oct 2020, 14:39
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Integrated Review (previously SDSR 2020)
Replies: 1307
Views: 60989
United States of America

Re: Integrated Review (previously SDSR 2020)

I am not sure if the non-budget part of the integrated review has been delayed for a year yet. They could just release a short document, without a budget component, titled "Integrated Review" and be done with that term. Didn't they do the same with the Modernising Defence Review two years ...
by military
20 Oct 2020, 18:09
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Integrated Review (previously SDSR 2020)
Replies: 1307
Views: 60989
United States of America

Re: Integrated Review (previously SDSR 2020)

For a depressing time, you can watch MoD officials refuse to answer any question asked by MPs about the British Army's armoured infantry brigades and armoured fighting vehicles program. The committee hearing mainly covers Ajax, Boxer, Challenger 2 and Warrior, although Bulldog also gets mentioned. h...
by military
16 Oct 2020, 13:39
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Integrated Review (previously SDSR 2020)
Replies: 1307
Views: 60989
United States of America

Re: Integrated Review (previously SDSR 2020)

The Army is to be cut from 82,000 positions to 75,000 positions according to the Daily Mail. Not all the positions are filled now, so there would be few redundancies. I would personally prioritize the armoured fighting vehicle fleet over saving these unfilled positions, so I am fine with this given ...
by military
16 Oct 2020, 13:37
Forum: British Army
Topic: Warrior Armoured Vehicles (British Army)
Replies: 1041
Views: 324944
United States of America

Re: Warrior Armoured Vehicle Variants (British Army)

Lord Jim: 1. As a minor point, there are two Nexter turrets for the CT40 gun: the one on Jaguar and a second one that has been photographed or at least photoshopped onto a Boxer hull. 2. I don't know whether these Nexter turrets support the Generic Vehicle Architecture, which actually formed the bas...
by military
15 Oct 2020, 02:19
Forum: British Army
Topic: Warrior Armoured Vehicles (British Army)
Replies: 1041
Views: 324944
United States of America

Re: Warrior Armoured Vehicle Variants (British Army)

Here is an article by Harry Lye on the gun with a different take than the Twitter thread / Janes article mentioned above.

https://www.army-technology.com/feature ... of-delays/

I do think the export potential of the CTA gun is limited.
by military
13 Oct 2020, 18:25
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Integrated Review (previously SDSR 2020)
Replies: 1307
Views: 60989
United States of America

Re: Integrated Review (previously SDSR 2020)

A full strike Brigade will be achieved in the early 2030s.” I must have missed that in the original (Army) source? - and the second one then? The quote from the MoD submission to the Defence Committee is Boxer will be at full operating capability in the early 2030s allowing the remaining protected ...
by military
12 Oct 2020, 22:44
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Integrated Review (previously SDSR 2020)
Replies: 1307
Views: 60989
United States of America

Re: Integrated Review (previously SDSR 2020)

Here is an article from The Telegraph highlighting that by 2025 the British Army will be able to field only two brigades in 3rd Division and one will be presumably an armoured infantry brigade with one Challenger regiment and two Warrior battalions and the other will be some sort of light formation ...
by military
03 Oct 2020, 21:59
Forum: Royal Air Force
Topic: Future UK Combat Aircraft (Project Tempest)
Replies: 4067
Views: 975771
United States of America

Re: Future UK Combat Aircraft (Project Tempest)

For a basic comparison, I quickly found the total development budget for the US Small Diameter Bomb Increment II / StormBreaker. It is $2.1 billion in US dollars. In addition, the procurement cost is $3.3 billion. By comparison, $11 million for JNAAM seems like a trivial investment. I am not sure wh...
by military
03 Oct 2020, 21:44
Forum: British Army
Topic: Warrior Armoured Vehicles (British Army)
Replies: 1041
Views: 324944
United States of America

Re: Warrior Armoured Vehicle Variants (British Army)

The separate speeches this week by CDS and CGS were all about being light and deployable, which sounds bad for 1) casualties if there is a war and 2) AFV programmes. CDS is the inventor of strike brigades, from an earlier posting, and there are probably more jobs associated with Ajax than Warrior. A...
by military
01 Oct 2020, 00:18
Forum: British Army
Topic: Warrior Armoured Vehicles (British Army)
Replies: 1041
Views: 324944
United States of America

Re: Warrior Armoured Vehicle Variants (British Army)

I should put this in one of the threads on armoured vehicles, and this thread is the most active currently. There is new submissions to the Defence Committee from General Dynamics UK (Ajax), Rheinmetall BAE Systems (Boxer, Challenger 2 LEP), and KMW/Nexter (Boxer, Leopard 2, French CT40 turret). Thi...
by military
26 Sep 2020, 23:31
Forum: British Army
Topic: Boxer / Mechanised Infantry Vehicle (MIV)
Replies: 2809
Views: 734759
United States of America

Re: Boxer / Mechanised Infantry Vehicle (MIV)

Think Defence has expanded a lengthy article on the UK's history with the Boxer programme and added an article on Boxer variants. They are worth reading if you have a few hours! https://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/boxer-armoured-vehicle-british-army/ https://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/boxer-armoured-vehicle-...
by military
26 Sep 2020, 23:27
Forum: British Army
Topic: Warrior Armoured Vehicles (British Army)
Replies: 1041
Views: 324944
United States of America

Re: Warrior Armoured Vehicle Variants (British Army)

The CT40 while compact has a very unique setup, the idea you could quickly shoe-horn it into an existing turret architecture, that isn't designed to accept it, is day dreaming. Makes sense. We'll see if Warrior CSP gets cancelled and replaced by a Boxer IFV variant. At that point, it is probably be...
by military
26 Sep 2020, 18:13
Forum: British Army
Topic: Warrior Armoured Vehicles (British Army)
Replies: 1041
Views: 324944
United States of America

Re: Warrior Armoured Vehicle Variants (British Army)

Julian Nettlefold has claimed "WCSP would be replaced by another variant of Boxer with a Rafael CT40 or 30mm customised turret as chosen by Lithuania." This Israeli turret is unmanned so it wouldn't impact the number of dismounts in the Boxer infantry version. See the brochure below. https...
by military
26 Sep 2020, 17:59
Forum: British Army
Topic: FV4034 Challenger 2 Main Battle Tank (British Army)
Replies: 2323
Views: 1038306
United States of America

Re: FV4034 Challenger 2 Main Battle Tank (British Army)

Is point 5 referring to new modular armour for the front of the Hull? Or could it be an add on armour package for both the hull and the "New" turret, basically a TES set for use when deployed operationally. I presume the turrets get new armour as the turrets will be newly manufactured by ...
by military
26 Sep 2020, 03:30
Forum: British Army
Topic: FV4034 Challenger 2 Main Battle Tank (British Army)
Replies: 2323
Views: 1038306
United States of America

Re: FV4034 Challenger 2 Main Battle Tank (British Army)

As a guess about NMA, I believe the kits of appliqué armour used in Iraq in 2003 for Challenger 2 were the same kits used for Challenger 1 in Iraq in 1991. Some of the appliqué armour goes on the front hull, so maybe they are replacing that? The original website posting with this info seems rather s...
by military
25 Sep 2020, 21:16
Forum: British Army
Topic: Ajax Armoured Vehicles (British Army)
Replies: 2432
Views: 535351
United States of America

Re: Ajax Armoured Vehicle Variants (British Army)

He’s very forthright with his statements. I wonder how he knows these things. It’s certainly the first I’ve heard about the Pizzaro and Ulan being rejected by Spain and Austria respectively. The spanish cut their second batch short, according to Wiki, perhaps that’s what he means? That is one inter...
by military
25 Sep 2020, 18:51
Forum: British Army
Topic: Ajax Armoured Vehicles (British Army)
Replies: 2432
Views: 535351
United States of America

Re: Ajax Armoured Vehicle Variants (British Army)

Julian Nettlefold, the editor of Battlespace magazine, has gone on the record with some of the problems with Ajax and Warrior. I placed the Warrior quotes in the Warrior thread here on the site. Yes and no. The choice of the CT40 canon as GFE equipment on both vehicles is the major cause of problems...
by military
25 Sep 2020, 18:47
Forum: British Army
Topic: Warrior Armoured Vehicles (British Army)
Replies: 1041
Views: 324944
United States of America

Re: Warrior Armoured Vehicle Variants (British Army)

Julian Nettlefold has some inside information on very serious issues with the Warrior CSP programme (and Ajax, which has its own thread). This is in a submission to the parliamentary Defence Committee for its inquiry into AFVs. Warrior CSP looks to be unaffordable and looks to be the sacrificial lam...
by military
21 Sep 2020, 23:25
Forum: British Army
Topic: FV4034 Challenger 2 Main Battle Tank (British Army)
Replies: 2323
Views: 1038306
United States of America

Re: FV4034 Challenger 2 Main Battle Tank (British Army)

Because I brought up Leopard 2's armour before, this thread on another discussion forum is a long and detailed discussion of Leopard 2's armour. I would say 2/3s of the discussion is about Cold War era tanks. There are few comparisons to other modern tanks. It does seem like the new German 2A7v mode...
by military
19 Sep 2020, 20:59
Forum: British Army
Topic: FV4034 Challenger 2 Main Battle Tank (British Army)
Replies: 2323
Views: 1038306
United States of America

Re: FV4034 Challenger 2 Main Battle Tank (British Army)

RetroSicotte wrote:That youtuber is notoriously inaccurate with their data and has been called out several times in the past. No better than Matsimus.
I am sure every source has been wrong before. What specifically was the YouTuber RedAlert wrong about?
by military
18 Sep 2020, 01:14
Forum: Royal Air Force
Topic: Eurofighter Typhoon (RAF)
Replies: 2828
Views: 769097
United States of America

Re: Eurofighter Typhoon (RAF)

Here is RUSI analyst Justin Bronk giving a detailed comparison of the Typhoon and Rafale. The two aircraft are similar overall but there are many subtle differences.

https://hushkit.net/2020/09/17/eurofigh ... omparison/