Search found 5583 matches
- 23 Apr 2024, 01:41
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Astute Class Attack Submarine (SSN) (RN)
- Replies: 852
- Views: 305513
- 22 Apr 2024, 16:27
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Multi-Role Support Ships (MRSS)
- Replies: 108
- Views: 13999
Re: Multi-Role Support Ships (MRSS)
Man power issue is essential. RFA cannot man any FSSS now. To man (even only) 2 of the 3 FSSS, RFA needs 202 crew. Giving away all 3 Bays will release 210 RFA crew. Done. Tides are not fully manned, and there is no redundant crew. If MROSS-2 and MHC-LSV's core crew is to come from RFA, crew of RFA A...
- 22 Apr 2024, 15:18
- Forum: Joint Service
- Topic: AW159 Wildcat Helicopter (RN & AAC)
- Replies: 489
- Views: 213714
- 21 Apr 2024, 23:29
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19387
- Views: 9716847
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
1) CAMM systems are said to be similar to PAMS. If so, and CAMM can be integrated into TACTICOS with no issue, could we not reverse it? Doable. And it will cost as much as T45, of course? This is the whole point I’m stating. I can see no reason an AAW ship with SeaViper on TACTICOS can be cheaper t...
- 21 Apr 2024, 16:29
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19387
- Views: 9716847
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
1) CAMM systems are said to be similar to PAMS. If so, and CAMM can be integrated into TACTICOS with no issue, could we not reverse it? Doable. And it will cost as much as T45, of course? This is the whole point I’m stating. I can see no reason an AAW ship with SeaViper on TACTICOS can be cheaper t...
- 21 Apr 2024, 14:01
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19387
- Views: 9716847
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
...Thanks, so your proposal is to make an expensive AAW version of T31. Integrating SeaViper system into TACTICOS CMS will cost a lot. Adding the required CMS analyses power will cost a lot. And, integrating Aster-30 missile into Mk41 VLS will cost (or your proposal is to locate Sylver A50 VLS in p...
- 20 Apr 2024, 15:16
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19387
- Views: 9716847
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
On T13GP. I will address my view.., 1: Armament level of a GP frigate shall be "aligned" to the threat level. In pre-Red Sea Houthi conflict era, GP-frigate must be aligned to KIPION. The "as-is" armament level of, 1x 57mm gun, 2x 40mm guns, 12 CAMM, with up to 2x Wildcat, is ver...
- 20 Apr 2024, 14:50
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19387
- Views: 9716847
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
T31 "as is" is cheap because it is simple. Just it. It’s also worth remembering that for every system added the crew allocation rises. It won’t stay at 105 for long if capabilities keep getting bolted on. Agreed. My main point remains that the U.K. must return to a balanced fleet because ...
- 20 Apr 2024, 14:01
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19387
- Views: 9716847
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
As an amateur just trying to explore the surface level costs, it is clear that military spending is confusing at best, misleading even. Babcock apparently has variants of the Type 31 for proposal purposes, and I would be interested in knowing what a Type 31+ or Type 31++ will cost and if it compare...
- 20 Apr 2024, 13:53
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: River Class (OPV) (RN)
- Replies: 5492
- Views: 1548588
Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)
But, HMS Endurance was not hit. Task for River B2 there is to be an OPV, not as an escort. Contribute to day-by-day presence. More similar to River B1/B2 "escorting" Russian cruisers in the Channel. Of course, even if it is T23 frigate escorting the Russian cruiser, T23 will NOT survive th...
- 20 Apr 2024, 13:37
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19387
- Views: 9716847
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
I guess you are proposing to use CEC to control SM-6? In other words, using T31 only as a Mk41 arsenal and SMART-L radar picket? In that case, there is a US destroyer there. In a theater as small as Red Sea, why not the US Destroyer just do the job? "The Americans will do it" is an old mi...
- 20 Apr 2024, 13:34
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19387
- Views: 9716847
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
To be clearer I meant the new long ranged SMART-L-EWC (Early Warning Capability) Radar in addition to Artisan. Adding Sampson is an option I guess but suspect the addition of the two will increase top weight too much, plus the fact it will not be able to be positioned high like the T45 means it’s n...
- 20 Apr 2024, 12:17
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19387
- Views: 9716847
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
How easy would it be to add SMART-L to the last three T31s? Where it is situated on the Iver Huitfeldt-class looks little changed. Cost wise it looks in the £10mns per unit so with maybe a £100mn upgrade overall. No chance to add Sampson due to the top weight. I understand Sampson is lighter than S...
- 19 Apr 2024, 00:10
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19387
- Views: 9716847
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
Two or three T31 for the same £1bn depending on how they are configured would add a lot more. Such a cheap T31, 330 GBP a pop, cannot do any good AAW. I am half a way between you two. I agree there is a clear need for 5 cheap GP frigates. But do not think 10 will be needed. If such money is there f...
- 18 Apr 2024, 22:21
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Type 26 Frigate (City Class) (RN) [News Only]
- Replies: 5669
- Views: 1485775
Re: Type 26 Frigate (City Class) (RN) [News Only]
Let’s not forget the inflation. Significant it is, especially from late 2022. If comparing cost figures, we need to “correct” them.
- 18 Apr 2024, 15:52
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19387
- Views: 9716847
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
Two or three T31 for the same £1bn depending on how they are configured would add a lot more. Such a cheap T31, 330 GBP a pop, cannot do any good AAW. I am half a way between you two. I agree there is a clear need for 5 cheap GP frigates. But do not think 10 will be needed. If such money is there f...
- 17 Apr 2024, 15:42
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19387
- Views: 9716847
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
The Iranians have a significant fleet of mini-subs which have really tested the Royal Navy. Agreed the threat is clear. Also UUVs will proliferate further and become a growing threat. What is needed to counter that? Is it a T26 or more likely something deployed from a T31 or T32. A Captas 2 or 4 in...
- 17 Apr 2024, 14:03
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Type 26 Frigate (City Class) (RN) [News Only]
- Replies: 5669
- Views: 1485775
Re: Type 26 Frigate (City Class) (RN) [News Only]
"T26 for export by even postponing RN hulls" is no problem. - Look at this build chart. Commissioning is early 2027, mid-2028, early 2030, 31, 32, 33, 34 and T26-hull8 commissioning is on early 2035. https://www.navylookout.com/type-26-frigate-construction-and-shipyard-investment-progress-...
- 16 Apr 2024, 16:05
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: River Class (OPV) (RN)
- Replies: 5492
- Views: 1548588
Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)
Another hull in Tonga. Yet another in Caribbean. And one in Falkland Island.
Not an asset to fight, but showing UK flag world wide. I think River B2 was a great buy, at last.
Not an asset to fight, but showing UK flag world wide. I think River B2 was a great buy, at last.
- 15 Apr 2024, 15:53
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: River Class (OPV) (RN)
- Replies: 5492
- Views: 1548588
Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)
Beautiful
- 15 Apr 2024, 13:06
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: River Class (OPV) (RN)
- Replies: 5492
- Views: 1548588
- 15 Apr 2024, 11:24
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: River Class (OPV) (RN)
- Replies: 5492
- Views: 1548588
Re: River Class (OPV) (RN)
Deployment continues.
- 12 Apr 2024, 17:16
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Type 23 Frigate (Duke Class) (RN) [News Only]
- Replies: 1013
- Views: 434986
Re: Type 23 Frigate (Duke Class) (RN) [News Only]
I have no idea on her fate. Artisan 3D it not there, but it can be craned easily. SeaCeptor datalink antenna has a cover, or non existing? The starboard 30mm guns is not there? Any thoughts?
- 12 Apr 2024, 16:57
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Type 26 Frigate (City Class) (RN) [News Only]
- Replies: 5669
- Views: 1485775
Re: Type 26 Frigate (City Class) (RN) [News Only]
https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/bae-target-dramatic-reduction-in-frigate-build-time/ We aim to reduce the build duration from the first of class being 96 months to the eighth being 60 months. More than that, we intend to compress the interval between ships from 18 months to 12 Now that’s an opportu...
- 11 Apr 2024, 15:01
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Multi-Role Support Ships (MRSS)
- Replies: 108
- Views: 13999
Re: Multi-Role Support Ships (MRSS)
Latest article on Navylookout discusses the armament of the two ships deployed to the Indo-Pacific; Which raises the question, to what extent do we want to arm their future replacements? The US Navy is phasing out Phalanx, which is what the LPDs have now. The answer seems to depend on how available...