Search found 5612 matches
- 23 Apr 2024, 16:15
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
- Replies: 6142
- Views: 1863623
Re: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
Really? I see future on it. 100 nm in 30 knots means a bit more than 3 hours on ride. It is a ship to shore connector very different from an LCVP. Speed and sea worthiness are very important and cargo carriage is not a priority. LCVP is more near the mexefloat than this CIC. Any cargo can be carrie...
- 23 Apr 2024, 11:42
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19390
- Views: 9719837
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
Agree 100% with both posts with the exception of last part re FFBNW. FFBNW was acceptable during period of peace. But with Global tensions rising thanks to Russia, China, Iran and North Korea, together with proxy states, we can no longer risk it to the previous extent. Building one additional of bo...
- 23 Apr 2024, 09:54
- Forum: British Army
- Topic: Ground Based Air Defence
- Replies: 743
- Views: 198054
Re: Ground Based Air Defence
I am not saying any of this will happen the main thing for me is a long range radar on Mount Adam as in today battles any first wave attack will be drones and BM's to degrade defences What we have seen twice now in Israel is high volume low tec attacks to deplete missile defences followed by slight...
- 23 Apr 2024, 08:54
- Forum: British Army
- Topic: Ground Based Air Defence
- Replies: 743
- Views: 198054
Re: Ground Based Air Defence
For me if we can take the Falklands as a case I would like to see a CAMM battery on MP airfield and a land based Type 45 system with Aster 30 on Mount Adam West Falklands we also need to be thinking hard about the low end and for me we need to be looking a 6 round rapid ranger system with a 25 or 3...
- 22 Apr 2024, 17:25
- Forum: British Army
- Topic: Ground Based Air Defence
- Replies: 743
- Views: 198054
Re: Ground Based Air Defence
For me if we can take the Falklands as a case I would like to see a CAMM battery on MP airfield and a land based Type 45 system with Aster 30 on Mount Adam West Falklands we also need to be thinking hard about the low end and for me we need to be looking a 6 round rapid ranger system with a 25 or 3...
- 22 Apr 2024, 11:08
- Forum: British Army
- Topic: Ground Based Air Defence
- Replies: 743
- Views: 198054
Re: Ground Based Air Defence
For me if we can take the Falklands as a case I would like to see a CAMM battery on MP airfield and a land based Type 45 system with Aster 30 on Mount Adam West Falklands we also need to be thinking hard about the low end and for me we need to be looking a 6 round rapid ranger system with a 25 or 30...
- 22 Apr 2024, 08:42
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: General UK Defence Discussion
- Replies: 1923
- Views: 253665
Re: General UK Defence Discussion
A strategy to woo Guyana into using some of their oil money to contribute towards UK forces protecting them against Venezuela as they get stinking rich from the oil in peace would go a long way. Build up a local naval and air base in one of the dependencies or even Guyana itself. UK is not is posit...
- 21 Apr 2024, 16:41
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
- Replies: 6142
- Views: 1863623
Re: Current & Future Amphibious Capability - General Discussion
For me as said Army can have 3 Divisions with 9 Brigades 1st Division with 3 Light Mech brigades 3rd Division with 2 x Combined armed brigades 6th Division with 16AA , Rangers , 11th SFA , SF brigade The key will be the 3 Light Mech Brigades and what vehicles they have for me one of them should be ...
- 20 Apr 2024, 10:21
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19390
- Views: 9719837
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
In an effort to move the discussion along a bit. I am pleased you have conceded that at least in the short term RN must make the most of the T31. That’s progress . Thanks - but be under no illusion it’s fucking stupid how we got where we are. Edit: and if anyone even indirectly suggests we buy more...
- 20 Apr 2024, 10:00
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
- Replies: 19390
- Views: 9719837
Re: Current & Future Escorts - General Discussion
• Captas 4 for T31s and Captas 2 for the RB2s. What would the point of a towed array on the RB2s be? T31 can either carry weapons it self or an armed helicopter to prosecute the sub, what is a River meant to do? Scare it way just by pinging away on its sonar? A valid tactic I suppose. If they were ...
- 19 Apr 2024, 17:04
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Labour's likely defence policy
- Replies: 97
- Views: 990
Re: Labour's likely defence policy
NHS funding isn't in disarray it is higher than it has ever been, and that includes billions added by the Tories. Most cuts in government spending in the 14 years have been LAs, who are responsible for social care and the roads. That's such a false representation. The NHS is under increasing pressu...
- 19 Apr 2024, 12:33
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Labour's likely defence policy
- Replies: 97
- Views: 990
Re: Labour's likely defence policy
NHS funding isn't in disarray it is higher than it has ever been, and that includes billions added by the Tories. Most cuts in government spending in the 14 years have been LAs, who are responsible for social care and the roads. That's such a false representation. The NHS is under increasing pressu...
- 19 Apr 2024, 08:47
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Type 26 Frigate (City Class) (RN) [News Only]
- Replies: 5669
- Views: 1486841
Re: Type 26 Frigate (City Class) (RN) [News Only]
Remember that the Batch 2 order was signed in Nov 22 also I am not comparing costs just laying out what was said and what has happeneddonald_of_tokyo wrote: ↑18 Apr 2024, 22:21 Let’s not forget the inflation. Significant it is, especially from late 2022. If comparing cost figures, we need to “correct” them.
- 18 Apr 2024, 18:10
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Type 26 Frigate (City Class) (RN) [News Only]
- Replies: 5669
- Views: 1486841
Re: Type 26 Frigate (City Class) (RN) [News Only]
History 101 So you can't tell me how so? The RN clearly wanted all 13, and there were rumours of a £11bn price tag, the Treasury said no. Yes but it was the navy who messed up the procurement as such that the price rose to that, out of the RN's budget, so if they did ask the treasury for more then ...
- 15 Apr 2024, 10:51
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Labour's likely defence policy
- Replies: 97
- Views: 990
Re: Labour's likely defence policy
Anyone here follow this podcast? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1adaPHQLc5w Listening to the Shadow Defense minister this morning on the news and he had a lot of nothing to say, no commitments to anything sadly. A few takeaway points of Labours plan. Building a strong UK Home defence, whatever tha...
- 14 Apr 2024, 11:28
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Type 26 Frigate (City Class) (RN) [News Only]
- Replies: 5669
- Views: 1486841
Re: Type 26 Frigate (City Class) (RN) [News Only]
A GP frigate for at least half the price or more can provide a good level of ASW with a TAS and it doesn't need to be modularised. But would your GP frigate actually catch any submarines? If the chances of that are tiny, it's wasted money. There a lots of frigates and destroyers around the world fi...
- 12 Apr 2024, 10:06
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Type 26 Frigate (City Class) (RN) [News Only]
- Replies: 5669
- Views: 1486841
Re: Type 26 Frigate (City Class) (RN) [News Only]
As the cost of type 26 B2's carries on climbing if we want ASW hunter killers then maybe more SSN's would be better The cost isn’t climbing - but yes a few (2-3) more T26s and a few more SSNs would be ideal - however believe it or not the crewing issues are easier to solve above water currently. OK...
- 11 Apr 2024, 09:45
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Type 26 Frigate (City Class) (RN) [News Only]
- Replies: 5669
- Views: 1486841
Re: Type 26 Frigate (City Class) (RN) [News Only]
Any illusion that build a new “cheaper” (read compromised) class in a multi-national program and it will be a success is just that, an illusion - albeit sadly one that the Treasury will believe. Are you suggesting the Australians have got it completely wrong with their smaller, more numerous ASW ve...
- 11 Apr 2024, 09:23
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Type 26 Frigate (City Class) (RN) [News Only]
- Replies: 5669
- Views: 1486841
Re: Type 26 Frigate (City Class) (RN) [News Only]
It’s a fair point, but the last thing we need is another class of ASW frigate I’m not suggesting it’s the best direction of travel but the benefits are clear. • A joint £5bn program with a NATO member to produce 10x next-gen GP Frigates optimised for off-board systems including ASW. • Rosyth is sec...
- 10 Apr 2024, 20:29
- Forum: Royal Navy
- Topic: Type 26 Frigate (City Class) (RN) [News Only]
- Replies: 5669
- Views: 1486841
Re: Type 26 Frigate (City Class) (RN) [News Only]
Even with the substantial hike in defence spending, is the Royal Norwegian Navy realistically going to be able to afford 5 x T26? It seems to me that it might be worth them considering either a 2 + 3 or a 3 + 2 mix with T31. Alternatively, 5 x FREMM or similar. 5 FDI or joining the new danish navy ...
- 09 Apr 2024, 19:16
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: The future form of the Army
- Replies: 665
- Views: 153386
Re: The future form of the Army
“What will win any war in the the high North will Logistics and we know that is a big failing in the Russian army 2 years into a major land war and there still not on top of it” If this is the lesson we need to heed then surely we should be significantly expanding our current supporting arms just t...
- 09 Apr 2024, 12:04
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: The future form of the Army
- Replies: 665
- Views: 153386
Re: The future form of the Army
“What will win any war in the the high North will Logistics and we know that is a big failing in the Russian army 2 years into a major land war and there still not on top of it” If this is the lesson we need to heed then surely we should be significantly expanding our current supporting arms just t...
- 08 Apr 2024, 10:12
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: The future form of the Army
- Replies: 665
- Views: 153386
Re: The future form of the Army
“What will win any war in the the high North will Logistics and we know that is a big failing in the Russian army 2 years into a major land war and there still not on top of it” If this is the lesson we need to heed then surely we should be significantly expanding our current supporting arms just t...
- 07 Apr 2024, 23:15
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: The future form of the Army
- Replies: 665
- Views: 153386
Re: The future form of the Army
“What will win any war in the the high North will Logistics and we know that is a big failing in the Russian army 2 years into a major land war and there still not on top of it” If this is the lesson we need to heed then surely we should be significantly expanding our current supporting arms just t...
- 07 Apr 2024, 18:59
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: The future form of the Army
- Replies: 665
- Views: 153386
Re: The future form of the Army
Moved across. For me as said Army can have 3 Divisions with 9 Brigades 1st Division with 3 Light Mech brigades 3rd Division with 2 x Combined armed brigades 6th Division with 16AA , Rangers , 11th SFA , SF brigade The key will be the 3 Light Mech Brigades and what vehicles they have for me one of t...