UK Defence Forum

IX(B) and 12 are the Sqns in question. 12 working with the Qataris.

They’ll be used for that as well. [emoji849]

Are you forgetting the ones from 17?

All good historical (and up to date) logged evidence of the RAF withholding Fast Jet assets from Carrier Strike. It should make the eventual transfer of the F35Bs to the RN far easier to justify. Not a good start for (RAF) "F35B Operational Squadron" qualification & training from the ...

By trailing them out there its a good way to keep up some training. Putting in a long distance trail isn't something that you want put together by people that have no experience or haven't done so in some time. That goes for the voyager crews as well. This way you get more training out of one exerc...

I’ve had another post removed, because I’ve criticised somebody’s post. 1. I’m putting it on here because this is the thread we all flock to. 2. Mods if you’re going to remove posts, at least have the courtesy to explain why, even by PM. 3. It is now blatantly obvious we need more moderators, I pro...

Qwerty wrote:The aircraft in the image is marked up for 617...

Wrong. All the Lightnings will have that marking and NO Sqn markings will be applied.

207 probably sending some jets back to Marhell later....

shotleylad wrote:The harbour boat tour is a complete joke the person giving the information is totally clueless.

Like 90% of this forum then!

Boom, boom. I am here all week.

Potential hypoxia?

Or you could just try making sense!

617 is already at Marhell.
207 is going to Marhell this summer from MCAS Beuafort.
17 is staying at Edwards AFB in California.

No way an innocent mistake. Spent three years with a personally allocated MT Car. Absolutely zero personal use allowed and they are all tracked by GPS. CSs combed the paperwork for inaccuracies. I don't know the guy, and have no bone in the fight, but it smacks to me of he thought he was above the r...

It already exists. 207.

Badge is irrelevant. All aircrew and Sqns train to the same standard and same competencies and will deploy the same.

But lets not let facts or reality get in the way of the internet experts.

Ron5 wrote:What the RAF bods here are missing is the genuine concern that RAF standards will be applied to F-35B deployments and not RN.

What standards mate? Genuinely interested in what you mean, or is it just more spineless sniping?

Dahedd wrote:With the announcement today of the purchase of 5 E7 Wedgetail is it not about time to look again at booms on the Voyagers? That's now C17, P8 & E7s that require a boom to refuel.

Discuss!

There is no fucking money, discuss.

RetroSicotte wrote:One way or another. This is a cut, and it should always be referred to as such.

I get your point, but gayways availability was so shit that this might see an improvement in some respects.

Good......

Cottesmore is fully army-fied.

There are no plans to base Typhoons anywhere else than Con/Lossie. End of.

Ok mate, you clearly know more than me about how RAF FJ Sqns work!

Crack on.

This shit makes me laugh.

Pure fantasy, there aren’t enough maintenance staff nor pilots for this pipe dream. Can barely find manning for 12 Sqn as it is.

Jokers.

Thirded.

What does the thread starter think tho?

Good for you. Remind us again what percentage of threads across the forum were started by you? You had the stat a while ago.....

I would remind people that this thread is only for the UK's F-35B aircraft. This thread is in the UK Equipment section. If you have international news of the F-35A/B/C, please use the international threads. Thankyou. I would remind you that you are not a mod. But that would be pointless because you...